>open ubuntu software program
>its on the front page
I thought you guys said this was a windows exclusive program
>open ubuntu software program
>its on the front page
I thought you guys said this was a windows exclusive program
Other urls found in this thread:
github.com
deadbeef.sourceforge.net
deadbeef.sourceforge.net
twitter.com
its an unofficial sandboxed wrapper for the windows version running in wine, packaged as a snap
Poor linux users.
Clementine is better anyways
From what I remember when I used it, no simple way to drag a folder and turn it into a playlist, and no options to fix character encoding in files. And obviously UI nowhere near as customizable as foobar.
> no simple way to drag a folder and turn it into a playlist
???
heresy
foobar isnt, hasnt, and wont be topped.
deadbeef is better
no
at least foobar doesn't corrupt your ogg files even though is proprenes tit pinne fens soften
>no tube sound vst
yikes
write it yourself, dipshit
wat
oh nvm
github.com
that's a weird issue
but i don't have much ogg files
I fucking hate this logo
Winamp is better anyways
>what is cmus
>linuxtards bringing up software that has always been shitty in some way and dragging behind nonfree counterparts
every time
haha no sir
no effin way
ok cucknet
the absolute state of loonixfags
deadbeef is fucking terrible compared to foobar
Wrong and wrong
>some guy decides to package windows only software for linux
>somehow that's bad
Sandboxed = better and also this and audacious are better.
>loonixfags still can't make something as good as foobar
we do, clementine
>x is better
nah, stop being delusional and just accept foobar's superiority.
>windows only shitware
>better
no
ok
SEETHING
Deadbeef is a shitty clone. The media keys integration is a joke and the sound output just breaks whenever it wants. Clementine is the only Linux music player worth using and vanilla Foobar2000 is still leagues ahead of that.
>foobar
Literally who?
then use the foobar2000 windows version in wine
>pretending to be retarded
you can't use fake ignorance as defense, you loonixmongoloid.
Nobody I know uses it. It's literally just a Jow Forums meme.
enjoy your botnet wintard
You don't know anybody, friend.
>I only know autistic brainlets who don't know about the best audio player
says more about you and your mongoloid surroundings
nobody but autistic people actually use the term "brainlet"
>0 arguments
>0 arguments against the actually superior products, Clementine and Audacious
I used foobar for a while, I removed that old crap from my Windows partition long ago, I'm starting to think this software is just a Jow Forums meme
>The media keys integration
What even is this?
>sound output just breaks whenever it wants
Are you sure this isn't related to your hardware?
>vanilla Foobar2000 is still leagues ahead of that.
In what way?
SEETHING damage control
Also, why would you even use it on Windows when Musicbee exists?
see thing? wat?
>tries to go "literally who" on foobar
>names off two literal whos that don't come close to it
>yeah well i don't know any one who uses foobar! it's a meme!
I don't know anyone who uses davinci resolve so i guess it's just a /p/ meme you retarded faggot
how about has ne body tried sayonara player how is it please tell us let to us no yes?
>What even is this?
Retard.
>In what way?
Have you not tried to customize deadbeef at all?
What's good about foobar2000?
>What even is this?
>Retard.
Ah, thanks for clarifying. Here's (You)r (You).
errythang
low resource usage
metadata editing
transcoding
customise ui as u is
can even rip cd if you want to
rename and move and copy your music as u like
5/5 all around
makes me want to shake it
Don't be retarded, next time, retard.
>implying Jow Forums users using foobar are less autistic than the fuckskulls on this site
user, i don't like foobar and you were pretty much right in your autistic posts until this
It really isn't. I use deadbeef because it's the best option on Linux but I don't act like it's better than foobar, that's crazy talk.
Why would I use anything else than cmus?
why do people prefer this over audacious
GNOME Music
/thread
i used it for a long time, but then i switched back to clementine
Not at all exclusive to it.
deadbeef.sourceforge.net
>ad hominem is an argument
Kys
>foofags THIS insecure about their garbage player
laughinggirls.jif
It's garbage
to play anything other than mp3/wav/opus/flac
I'm the kinda guy that definitely prefers guis but the linux music players with guis I've used are all trash
Moc and cmus are wayyy better. The others I've noticed are really fiddly with playlists, syncing music libraries, slow, playback, etc.
If you're a vimfag do cmus. Otherwise do moc. And install beets.io to make your music library super easy to browse in console
Takes a little bit more setup, yes, but after 30 minutes or so of using it, you'll wonder how you ever lived by using gui music players
>Gets some shitty, overhyped autism player without any extra work and is sandboxed
>Somehow that's a bad thing for Linux users
Absolute state of wintoddlers
Why do people use foobar? Who gives a shit about customizing a music player. I'm listening to music, not staring at the album art all day. Didn't even use foobar for that long when I was on windows and don't miss it at all on Linux
What more do you need?
Musicbee is much better
Clementine is shit and has a trash UI
Aside from organising the UI elements I don't customise it. The plugins are what makes it so good. It feels like there's a plugin for everything.
mpd + mpd client of choice > everything
I just use foobnix, I actually like it better than foobar 2000.
From their FAQ
>What is Foobnix?
>Foobnix is music player
Yeah no thanks
You're thinking of foobar
what is foobar then?
s/clementine/quodlibet/
>media keys integration
works on my machineā¢
The absolute state of Linux
>being self-sufficient
>the absolute state
What did he mean by this?
This. Poobar needs an infinite amount of hours wasted on to get it to a usable state.
>t. uses defaults
I present Neo-Jow Forums
ultra kek