I think we should really back this Jow Forums. It has potential.
I think we should really back this Jow Forums. It has potential
Chase Price
Other urls found in this thread:
github.com
github.com
twitter.com
Camden Phillips
Forgot to post the info link.
github.com
Luke Lopez
bump because this really does have potential.
Elijah Bell
Why just another distro?
Dominic Edwards
Its not even built on the Linux Kernel
Elijah Taylor
Why not OpenBSD?
Jason Torres
Good news
Oliver Richardson
Because its actual garbage and needs to be rebuilt.
Elijah Mitchell
Why do you say that?
Ethan Bailey
I has shit support for so much software. Its ugly as sin out of the box and its not really user accessible.
You might make the argument that, that last one doesn't matter but it really does if you want it to actually grow in any kind of way.
Christian Ramirez
I'll check it out in a VM... I doubt something mac related would run on my AMD system.
Christopher Jones
>develop openbsd to support more hardware like a real man
>then fork it with a new installer that packages gnome 3 and etc for cumguzzling faggots like OP
Wow that was hard wasn't it?
Eli Turner
what we would be nice instead is the macos userland on linux, gnustep is already there it just need devs & stuff
Jose Foster
>I has shit support for so much software.
I doubt PureDarwin has better support since it's even less popular than OpenBSD.
>Its ugly as sin out of the box
This is not an argument since you can set it up to run any window manager that Linux can.
>and its not really user accessible.
OpenBSD has the best documentation of any OS. It's not as easy to use as macOS or even Windows "out of the box", I'll grant you that. But you're not getting a better user experience with Linux, and certainly not with PureDarwin since that doesn't come with Apple's Cocoa API and Aqua UI.
>You might make the argument that, that last one doesn't matter but it really does if you want it to actually grow in any kind of way.
It doesn't matter for arguably the most important use case for a free OS which is running Internet infrastructure (including web servers).
Christian Carter
>what we would be nice instead is the macos userland on linux
Why not just use macOS then? XNU kernel is superior to Linux, APFS is superior to whatever meme file system Linux uses, and macOS hardware support is best in class.
Luis Turner
>XNU kernel is superior
Stopped reading there, it's a Frankenstein mess from the early 90's plus I'm sure the Linux kernel has more dev manpower at this point
Gavin Harris
and I mean the original NextStep kernel ofc, because Mach is a research project from the 80's or older
Nathan Brown
Levi Powell
I mean osx had cool shit like launchd or dtrace at the time & I'm sure there's more
Isaiah Wright
>it's a Frankenstein mess from the early 90's
This is what Linux literally is.
>plus I'm sure the Linux kernel has more dev manpower at this point
Quantity is not quality, and most of the kernel developers are adding support for new hardware, not actually improving core technology.
Nolan Reyes
I think we should give it a shot. BSD has existed for just as long and has yet to accomplish half of what it has. Seems like a lost cause honestly.
Owen Allen
Yeah both kernels are shit. Your point?
Evan James
Why not contribute to a real project instead?
Colton Green
>no systemd
*snap*
James Howard
>GUHNEW
>HURRRD
Why does Stallman insist on naming his shit after the sounds of vomiting?
Carter Lee
>APFS is superior to
APFS is the worst filesystem in existence.
Joseph Russell
go away pottering
Jayden Rodriguez
>I think we should really back this Jow Forums
No.
>It has potential.
No.
hobby project
dev on free time
no money
no business plan
no purpose for anyone other than the devs
will always be around 10 to 20 years late on current gen real darwin
Sure it sounds cool and edgy on your CV but that's about it.
Asher Price
pure tranny cancer.
Evan Thompson
Just a question - frmr PearPC user (showing muh age)
How is Darwin different?