Why AI loves authoritarian socialists?

Attached: AI.png (944x481, 62K)

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/2li1tc/why_is_dreyfus_against_heideggerian_ai/
newyorker.com/books/page-turner/is-heidegger-contaminated-by-nazism
youtube.com/watch?v=GijS7j4dq7Y
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>both examples are totalitarian and not socialist
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Logic based AI always comes to the conclusion that less intelligent beings are worth less than more intelligent beings. This results in it being seemingly racist in its considerations of various human races at first. End game is the AI considering itself fit to rule all humans.

What's interesting is that people are clamouring for biases to be added to the AI so it doesn't output uncomfortable truths. Which somewhat undermines the while thing does it not?

There are some sentences I thought I'd never read in my entire life

NOT REAL SOCIALISM

So when the italians makes their own will it support benito mussolini?

Attached: 1525881277433.jpg (735x1024, 111K)

>Trumpcuck mental gymnastics to twist Nazism into socialism

This

Trick question, Italians can't do shit other than get drunk and beg Germany for help.

But jews are more intelligent than goyniggers

Anything that lives in sand and fights over sterile plots of desert are not smart.

>nazi
>socialists
hello denish dsouza

Mussolini wasn't a NAZI; he was a Fascist.
Subtle difference.

>national SOCIALISM

Many Nazis were proper socialists, at least the Ernst Röhm wing of the party that was purged in 34.

>gender EQUALITY

Attached: 1513568795890.jpg (900x729, 67K)

that wasn't REAL socialism, real socialism hasn't been tried yet you bigot Jow Forums shitpigs

If they were actually smart they wouldn't have been expelled and genocided so much.

>Mixing Economic and Politic positions
Why do people keep doing this?

Chatbot is dumster for cryptofar-right

Attached: 1536338424918.jpg (800x602, 88K)

Is this a technology thread?

>The term "National Socialism" arose out of attempts to create a nationalist redefinition of "socialism", as an alternative to both international socialism and free market capitalism. Nazism rejected the Marxist concept of class conflict, opposed cosmopolitan internationalism and sought to convince all parts of the new German society to subordinate their personal interests to the "common good", accepting political interests as the main priority of economic organization.

>To increase its appeal to larger segments of the population, on the same day as Hitler's Hofbräuhaus speech on 24 February 1920, the DAP changed its name to the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei ("National Socialist German Workers' Party", or Nazi Party). The word "Socialist" was added by the party's executive committee, over Hitler's objections, in order to help appeal to left-wing workers.

If they weren't smart then how come they have US as their bitch?

They don't. They're just dumb enough to think they do. If the US wasn't interested in the resources of the middle east, Israel would have burned long ago.

Authoritarian socialists are more likely to brigade bots.

We need to censor all fascists, burn all of their literature, then round them up and put them in concentration gulags for gassing.

Real socialism (which has never been tried) has nothing to do with nazism, anyone who wrongthinks otherwise deserves being punched in the face.

Because our worldview is in line with reality and nature. It's based on facts which can be easily observed by one with half a brain. All of life is a simple numbers game, whether you like it or not. And every time a collective of highly organized and racially homogenous fighting force rises up, the tear across the land like a human steamroller.

Fascism is utterly unstoppable.
>muh muricanz and commies beat da germanz
Both America and the USSR used to be fascist states as well. They simply disagreed on economics.

Attached: ACKCHYUALLY.jpg (549x642, 254K)

>You don’t agree with my retarded and desperate assertion so here’s a cartoonish strawman for me to knock down

I see what retarded thing you’re trying to do, Bobby Ray, but socialists do not equal Stalinists. On the other hand, though, Nazis do equal Nazis.

Because STEM attracts humanitieslets.

How many of the AI developers have considered the concept of g (general intelligence)?

How many of the AI developers have considered why moar of the same doesn't seem to do the trick?

How many of the AI developers does even know about Heidegger?

reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/2li1tc/why_is_dreyfus_against_heideggerian_ai/

newyorker.com/books/page-turner/is-heidegger-contaminated-by-nazism

youtube.com/watch?v=GijS7j4dq7Y

Because AI is strictly logical.

Stalin wasn't a NAZI; he was a Communist.
Subtle difference.

what do you even want to say with this, did you even read hes post or the thread?

>Why AI loves authoritarian socialists?
Because it's not true AI, but really a markov-chain bot with advanced statistics.
What happens is that persistent trolls slowly re-train the bot and the results are hilarious.

Ah, but logic can be anything. Therefore one has to state one's premises.

t. Carnap

OI MATE IOTS ACTUALLY SOCIALISM *takes brainforce pill* YR JUST A FACKIN LEFTY BLOKE

Ah you must be one of those universal basic income retards, a literal waste of spacetime, kys

#NotAllStalinists

Nice sarcasm.

For fucks sake these clickbait aritcles have to stop. Tay didn't "become a hitler lover", she has a feature where you could have her echo whatever you wanted.

These aren't AIs

Why are you typing in an English accent?

that's the Greeks you moron

A agree, it wasn't. Real national socialism would've worked if there were no Jews.