CoC #realnews

>gpl 2 is cucked
>why?
>because it allows anyone to pull their code
>no matter how central their code is to the project
>so far only republicans have pulled code
>the sjws can pull code too
>this puts power in the control of the individual and not the comunity
>it also puts the power in the hands of any company who submitted code to linux
>This goes against open source.
>the proper way to solve controversey is by forking the code
>gpl 2 is thus cucked
>alternatives?
>A. Stallman makes a GPL 2 revised edition saying you can not pull your code because this interferes with the four freedoms
>B. BSD license
>inb4 GPL 3
>in theory this would work but traditionally hardware manufacturers have refused it because it makes them open source their drivers
>that is an issue for hardware manufacturers because they want to protect their hardware patents
>in theory it could work but it would require alot more manpower in the linux kernel
>inb4 hurd
>anyone who says hurd is a newFRIEND who doesnt understand code
>hurd is not ready at all.
>it has not been proven to work and is very slow

Attached: 1537401203619.png (427x576, 310K)

Other urls found in this thread:

openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#softraid
ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.3/packages/amd64/
lulz.com/linux-devs-threaten-killswitch-coc-controversy-1252/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Linux is on its fucking deathbed. Just let it go. I've already migrated most of my shit to OpenBSD (servers) and Haiku (desktop).

Attached: 1d4f2d518a6e3c1ce8946326fd66b3c0d7f4a0ca70a8251ffc4ae87567aea23e.gif (600x375, 205K)

I fail to see the problem. People shouldn't be required to make the source code available indefinitely. They should, however, be required to provide it as long as they're providing binaries. Nothing will happen if the Linux source code is taken down from main site because they are thousands of people who have the source code and can reupload it.

How can we let go of something that has been a part of us for years?

GNU/Hurd
I can invest 1$ into development. But manufacturers have to write free drivers

install OpenBSD.

This whole ""kill switch" meme is bullshit. You can't remove any code already published under the GPL.

yes you can

you can't force people to delete already distributed code. Means you can't disable running systems.
Fedora, Debian, all distros will be fine and will be able to continue distributing their software.
However the Linux Kernel will not be updated anytime soon.
Gentoo and other similar "compile from source" distros are dead in the water for new installs.

Because it's over

Attached: haveibeenpwned2.png (1394x906, 355K)

Because it has contracted AIDS.

How do you setup full disk encryption on OpenBSD?

>so far only republicans have pulled code
link?

Of all the things to kill off Loonix, trannies would have been the last thing i expected

no you can not
you already distributed that code under the license so anybody that has it can redistribute it under the same license indefinitely

FOR FUCKS SAKE PEOPLE, WAKE THE FUCK UP.

LINUX AND FREE SOFTWARE IS BEING SABOTAGED. SJW NONSENSE IS JUST THE WEAPON.

REFUSE/RESIST.

read the documentation on their official website, it's very complete :
openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#softraid

is there LUKS? Can you get the tool post installation?

It's an ugly, but necessary step to make SJWs mass-selfdestruct. This has gone too far, and goes beyond Jow Forums

i don't know, check their mirrors for binary package installs to see if you can see LUKS

gentoomen rise up xd

All part of the plan.

Canada mirror here :
ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.3/packages/amd64/

>some of the biggest contributors pull their code
>either 4.19 causes mass shutdown of services as result of code pulling
>or 4.19 is never finished as even sjw:s realise it's over when core parts of code are taken away
>someone powerful enought pleas linus to come back
>linus gives strict conditions, starting with removal of CoC
>as his conditions are accepted he reveals he already had contacted everyone who had pulled their code and briefed them, the code is licensed again and world order is restored.

what are the odds?

Too idealistic. It is time to jump onto the OpenBSD ship.

0 no one cares and no one will pull code like your autist fantasy

>mfw some single irrelevant shitstirrer made a shitpost that would put most of Jow Forums to shame on twitter and half of Jow Forums immediately thinks she is part of some gerilja sjw organization
stop putting people into the "sjw-box" in your head
it makes you totally blind to and carried away by trivial bullshit

After the embrace of sjw bullshit telltale has failed, as all the company like them (Google is too big to fail for now, but it will get there, Leman Brothers was too big to fail too).
Why do they keep listening this people?

Attached: telltale5.png (1087x1631, 1.82M)

Nothing will come from this "kill switch". Even if legally true it would require millions in lawyer fees that nobody's willing to spend.
This will be quickly forgotten in a couple months, just like the controversy around TheTemple and Terry's death, and the corporate shills will consolidate their control of Linux.
Screenshot this.

>binaries

You fucking transphobe cis scum.

The weak must perish so that the strong may flourish

Attached: 1537404372668.jpg (540x563, 59K)

>>yes you can
>you can't force people to delete already distributed code.
Meaning no, you cannot. You "distributed" your code as soon as you sent it to ANYBODY else, including to the kernel mainline.

>>some of the biggest contributors pull their code
Won't happen; can't happen.

Stop shilling BSD. It's garbage.

What alternatives do we have besides winshit Macuck Book Pro?

Apache 2.0

...

If Linux is a tower, then one may conclude that what we are witnessing is the unfolding of another 9/11 event. That dude is using his CoC to plant the thermite/shape charges. What we will see is a figurative controlled demolition of the Linux Kernel in slow motion, and it will be rebuilt by gov/corp (((interests))). include yourselves in the screencap.
The 'plane' is coming.

Attached: 52a2e39d-630e-4f66-a72c-d5726e08e32a..jpg (640x428, 54K)

O'Sullivan's Law is why.
>O’Sullivan’s Law states that any organization or enterprise that is not expressly right wing will become left wing over time. The law is named after British journalistJohn O’Sullivan.
>Television shows are the best examples of this. 24, House. Charitable foundations are worse but harder to see.
>One of the reasons for this is leftist intolerance versus right-wing tolerance. Rightwingersare willing to hire openly left-wing employees in the interest of fairness. Left-wingers, utterly intolerant, will not allow a non-Liberal near them, and will harass them at every opportunity. The result over time is that conservative enterprises are infiltrated by leftists but leftist enterprises remain the same or get worse.
>Also,leftismis in and of itself a form of decay. It’s what happens not just to television shows but to nations, churches and universities as the energy given off by the big bang of their inception slowlyebbsaway. Rather thanexpendvitality in originality and creation they become obsessed withintrospection, popularity and lethargy.Leftismis entropy of the spirit and intellect.
>Another reason is that the parasitic nature of Liberals/Leftists attracts them to existing money.
>An enterprise can stave offO'Sullivan'sLaw if their creators keep it in mind and remain vigilant and truthful.
>O'Sullivan'sLaw hit 24 when they finally had a Muslim villain then started running disclaimers that Muslims aren't all terrorists.
>The Annenberg Foundation was started by a Republican but it didn't take long before O'Sullivan's Law had them handing adomestic terroristmoney for educating kids.
>The ACLU, the Ford Foundation and theEpiscopal Churchall fell to O’Sullivan’s Law.

Attached: 1e9ae72d.jpg (344x342, 24K)

who are you quoting?

>this puts power in the control of the individual and not the community
Fuck off back to Jow Forums you commie piece of shit.

It's not just software my duder; It's literally everything.

Based gpl2
It will save the kernel
SJWs haven't contributed anything so there is no threat

No LUKS, softraid is the way to go.

Hacker News is censoring this despite tons of upvotes and comments.

lulz.com/linux-devs-threaten-killswitch-coc-controversy-1252/

>Not migrating to TempleOS

Attached: 1526038755091.jpg (990x682, 49K)

>whatthehellamisupposestodo.png

Is Linus still alive? Has anyone heard from him after "he" wrote his farewell with (((smart quotes)))?