People will argue about this
People will argue about this
Logan Wilson
Other urls found in this thread:
clarkvision.com
twitter.com
Eli Turner
>buy amd ram
>it crashes on boot and is slow and has SJW botnet code in it
>take it back to gamestop and buy nvidia ram instead
>it was $10 more expensive but it's so much faster, never lags or crashes, and doesn't spy on you as much
Liam Williams
(you)
Cameron Jackson
> 720p on laptop is enough
> 128kbps mp3 changes nothing
> 24 fps is enough
Are you fa/g/s just malfunctioning human beings?
Logan Kelly
other than using mp3s, i see nothing particularly wrong with that greentext. unless you're watching videos regurarly or playing vidya on your laptop.
Aiden Walker
the human ass can only take 8 cocks at once
Cameron Robinson
I see a significant difference between 24 and 30 fps. I see a huge difference between 30 and 60 fps and between 60 and 144 fps. I see a significant difference between 720p, 1080p, and 4K. but I absolutely can not tell the difference between a 4MB 64kbps mp3 file and the same song as a 100+MB lossless flac file. I have high quality headphones and turned the sound quality to maximum in the control panel. I must just have low quality ears.
Christian Perry
64kbps should be very low quality. 256kbps is enough I guess for budget headphones.
Ryan Morgan
Please tell me it's 8 GB RAM per eye I just bought 16 GB RAM
Dominic Rivera
>SJW code
>implying SJWs can program
Ryder Martinez
Wtf, im totally ignorant towards Hardware world but how is ram spying ?
David Hernandez
>he doesn't know
Julian Stewart
>nvidia ram
>not spying on you
Nathan Martin
RAM sends all data from whatever is stored in RAM to NSA and Interpol servers.
Lucas Stewart
if you didn't defrag the factory installed botnets from your ram's bios immediately after buying it then it's too late, you're already fucked.
James Baker
Human eye can't see pixels past 720p.
Human ear can't hear difference beyond 128kbps
Human eye can't see more frames than 24
Anything past human limitations is inferior. We made computers, not other way around. Therefore, human limitations are superior.
Owen Stewart
>The human eye can only see 8gb of ram
>inmediatly belive this chimp tier lie
Jordan Gutierrez
technically you can't see the ram since it's inside the computer
Thomas Bailey
People don't see in Bytes, we see in Quarks
Josiah Taylor
>inmediatly belive
what?
Cameron Evans
except our bodies don't work like that. our center of focus actually has a pixel density of 4k, but is only around a 5% radius of our vision. the human ear part is correct however. also when your brain is on sympathetic flight or fight mode you can actually see something more like 100 fps.
Ian Allen
>I have no idea what I'm talking about
Logan Clark
Well how much can you see?
Matthew Anderson
I think you're wrong.
Angel Watson
>he assumes quality response to non quality post
humans don't see in pixels or in fps
This thread is stupid if you haven't realised it yet.
Joshua White
They break that down in the article and build approximations based on the arc between dot pairs.
Connor Kelly
64kbps on opus is enough for most music, except things very bloated on different instruments like prog rock
Wyatt Ross
>muh approximations
we still don't see in pixels or fps, or hear in know, or store memory in GiBs.
Benjamin Scott
Not sure if you're lying for fun or actually believe this fantasy.
Sebastian Baker
>amd ram
>nvidia ram
>gamestop
(you)
Adam Anderson
fight or flight mode lowers the fps you can see from 144 to 100?
Jaxson Campbell
they cant, thats why the ram crashes on boot and is slow.
cant you read?
Evan Ward
with high adrenaline your vision becomes blurry and shitty but you can see much faster. you would have to be smoking meth and getting chased by a lion before you could see 100fps, though. unless somebody is sperging out like a retard while playing games they're likely seeing around 30-40 fps. they have done extensive testing and found the huge majority of people can't correctly discern 30 fps from 60 fps animations played side by side. gaymers are anti-science corporate fuckdolls who will buy anything with a bigger number tacked onto the packaging.
Xavier Jenkins
>nvidia ram
>amd ram
wtf are those
Nicholas Diaz
other two are ok but, what the fuck is the problem about resolutions? they are just relative. it's software and websites that always push viewable capacity to the limits thus people towards consumerism at the same time.