Is 20 minutes to encode, and mux a bluray movie normal?

Is 20 minutes to encode, and mux a bluray movie normal?

Attached: adedq.png (451x334, 81K)

Please tell me.

I have no idea but have a bump for using a pic of Elizabeth

Thanks cultured gentleman.

Looks fast.

Did quality mode with h.265, and opus for audio.
I don't know if it's fast, slow, normal. I tried another video, and it took about 5 minutes, and aborted another one trying h265, because it was taking too long.

gpu encoding?
if gpu encoding is normal, the quality will be trash tho

Yea with nvenc. Quality seemed pretty good though.

>Quality seemed pretty good though
yify/5

Well image quality looks like this.

Attached: image.png (1920x1080, 3.15M)

Can nvenc get better quality?

so is that the encode or the source?
comparisons, mang

That was the encode. I can't get the bluray right now, because I don't want to wake room mate.

Attached: source.png (1920x1080, 3.53M)

completely different frame
also y u no crop?

Probably not. NVENC's advantage is that it is fast and it runs on a dedicated part of your GPU, but it falls short when it comes to quality and efficiency in terms of quality vs bitrate.

Maybe the same frame

Attached: source-cropped.png (1920x804, 1.96M)

Depends on your hardware. Could be just right, could be slow as fuck.

Hardware accelerated encoding is less efficient when it comes to the quality/size ratio. It either delivers worse results at the same bitrate or in your case a bigger file for the same quality.

No. You probly just muxed it, or only encoded audio.

Old wives tale

Seemed pretty accurate to me when I did some comparisons about two months ago.

>Seemed pretty accurate to me when I did some comparisons about two months ago.
Post your comparisons with source, hardware, and settings.

it shrunk the file by alot though.

Sounds like bs that you read on a forum.

name of the movie?

▶

▶Scouts Guide to the Zombie Apocalypse, or The Zombie Apocalypse: Boy Scouts Handbook

thanks user