Filesystem

user, whats your favorite filesystem and why?

Attached: hans.jpg (366x524, 42K)

ext4 and fat. Just werks.

ReiserFS, obviously. Or it was.

ext4. btrfs is second

ZFS, no fragmentation, check sums, fast, natural choice for RAID

Its still good in benchmarks. I hope for ReiserFS2 when hes back from prison.

unironically NTFS

If ReiserFS is murderfs, which one is lolifs? This may be relevant for a future media center project.

xfs, ext4 is mainstream and btrfs is broken

FAT12 master race

Attached: retro ballmer.jpg (228x300, 7K)

APFS

tpbp

I don't use a filesystem, i just run a modified kernel that uses the dd command to regulate processes' data input and output
2 1337 4 u

HFS

I use RAM as a swap space for the data throughput

I just hope maybe they provided him a computer in prison, maybe like they have classes for reeducation and shit. give this man a linux command line and 15 years of free uninterrupted time and you will get matrix tier fs

The sad(?) reality is that he probably has been brutally raped on multiple occasional and as a result he spends most of his days despondant in his cell.

Fragmentation

I'm confused. When you buy SSD's, you don't need to defrag them.

So in that case, how is NTFS bad if SSD's don't have to be defragged?

Never been to prison or jail but from what I heard and even from couple people who did some time that rape is not as common as it used to be. From what I understand he is a killer, a murderer, also somewhat more educated/intelligent than most inmates if he not a total g autist then he is doing just fine

Btrfs RAID56 was fixed in 4.16. There's no real reason to bother with XFS, you might as well use ext4 if you're content with a non-checksummed filesystem. Or if you're just some Arch user who wants to be different use something like JFS.

It still happens, just minor.

NTFS is bad because, unlike ZFS, it doesn't benefit from not being fragmented.