Why is certain pixel combinations unlegal?
Why is certain pixel combinations unlegal?
Chase Morales
Other urls found in this thread:
congress.gov
twitter.com
Jaxson Butler
it's all just atoms and waves and shit lmao officer her body is physically 99.9999% identical to before i broke her neck haha are you a brainlet officer?
Isaac Hill
she's more than legal now
Nathaniel Peterson
Why are certain numbers illegal?
Luis Ross
Do you have any reason to not change your atoms into a form others would call "dead", OP?
Jacob Lee
Who is this?
Matthew Rodriguez
why do roasties argue that sex with children is harmful while taking fifty eight miles of nigger dick a day themselves seems hypocritical
Elijah Stewart
Why certain atoms combinations are illegal?
Aiden Scott
1488?
Parker Cruz
Why is a certain arrangement of protons, neutrons, and electrons illegal?
Jordan Johnson
The reductionist argument may be retarded but riddle me this.
Why is information of any nature illegal?
Leo Hall
>Why is certain pixel combinations unlegal?
Shift from feudalism to centralised govt. and subsequent law making.
A better question would have been -
>Why is looking at images of paid underage models morally objectionable.
And the answer would be - it isn't really until it involves someone you care about.
Seconded.
Julian Hernandez
>$1 bill
Enjoy your pink-eye from the bill being lodged in a stripers ass
Gabriel Butler
>Why is information of any nature illegal?
Information is power.
Thomas Green
>paid underage models
You may mean "children with desperate single moms".
Evan Peterson
So long as it's pure fiction, its fine, i think.
Daniel Hughes
>You may mean "children with desperate single moms".
You may mean "lazy moms who want to make a quick buck"
Very few white people are too poor to survive.
Owen Thomas
So - since the child cannot fully consent, does the lack of moral fortitude reside with the parents for being prepared use their children for questionable financial gain or the photographer for taking exploitative photos or you the viewer for paying for/downloading and looking at the pics?
Easton Peterson
because it took exploitation to make the images happen retard. that's why you can't get in trouble for your stupid gross anime loli shit, because those are "pixel combinations" that didn't actually potentially fuck up a real human
Joseph Lopez
all of the above, because they wouldn't exist without each other. if disgusting people weren't looking at the pictures then disgusting parents and photographers wouldn't have a reason to distribute them
Dylan Bennett
Why are you people so insistent on roping more and more people into your pedophile cult?
You are trying to infect the brains of everyone here and I'm sick of it.
Dylan Nelson
I agree. But... the buck has to stop somewhere. Using the
>muh supply and demand
paradigm has some validity here but ultimately I'd go with the parents.
The photographer would still be taking pictures (questionable of not) and the lecherous paedos would still be wanking furiously to pics of prepubescent show queens but if the parents had any moral fibre they'd find a less questionable way of making money off their children.
>inb4 we haven't even looked at homeless/stateless kids whose guardians are doing the same thing.
Easton Rodriguez
>to survive
Well, most people in America arn't poor enough to die because of social safety nets like food stamps.
You can't be poor enough to die in America arguably unless you neglect yourself
Julian Brooks
>Under the Protect Act, it is illegal to create, possess, or distribute, "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting", that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is ‘obscene' or ‘depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in...sexual intercourse...and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.”
congress.gov