The eternal resolution

Attached: rez.png (1366x768, 33K)

It's almost 2019 and 768 vertical pixels are still a thing

Yes, they are almost not noticeable on laptops. You'd pay like 100$ more for a full hd screen which is so small you would not notice it not bieng FHD. 1366x768 is still good on them

Based.

Best resolution for laptops.

Not on my machine.

I replaced my screen with a 3k one (shade under 4k) and it's got that discolouration thing where white spots show in some areas against a pale background.

Sad!

1280x800 on 11" FTW.

cuck resolution

for me 1920x1200 @ 24" is absolute top comfy.
it saddens me that 16:10 became so rare and will probably vanish completely soon.

yep. it's great

Based, 640x480 is the only salvation

1600x900 and 1680x1050 best to ever exist

>1680x1050
For patricians only. It's a shame that getting a good panel at this res is so difficult.

>it saddens me that 16:10 became so rare and will probably vanish completely soon.

I've been looking for something higher than 1920x1200 and it's very hard to find anything that doesn't come with the huge premium over the 16:9 equivalent. I don't want to switch to 16:9 cancer since I prefer the extra vertical res in the applications I use but it looks like it's the end of the road for 16:10, gaymers and movie fags ruined it.

Attached: average_21-9_user.png (829x798, 430K)

You can have as many 16:10 screen as you want ...in VR ...in a few years

why do arcades still use this?

Daily reminder that if you buy a laptop with a screen resolution under 1080p and a mechanical drive in 2018 you're UNDENIABLY retarded.
>b-but I can just upgrade the HDD to a SSD for a few bucks
DOESN'T HINDER THE FACT THAT COMPANIES WILL SEE PEOPLE LIKE YOU BUYING THIS SHIT AND THINK "Oh we can actually get away with it haha".
Fucking dumbasses.

This

Just wait until they ruin 16:9 too. Soon every screen will have to be a 21:9 ultrawide.

this, i cannot fucking stand anything less than 1080p.

what if i need to look at documentation and my text editor at once.


is Jow Forums all CS larpers? how do you develop software with a sub 1080p screen

For me it's 4:3.

>What are virtual desktops

If you're not running 4k, you're a nigger.

Attached: sheeit.png (800x598, 130K)

I'm black and I'm running 4k dawg. It's the only way I can watch cuck porn before I spam it on /gif/.

To be fair, back then it was technically cheaper to replace the HDD with your own SSD. Now that prices have went down dramatically, there really is no excuse i guess.

Just a few options I found out.
I get it, there's people who can't dish out more than 300$ on a laptop but ffs AT LEAST wait until you have enough money or find a good deal.

Attached: 34534357.png (2109x1034, 516K)

technically 1024x768 is the eternal resolution or 800x600.

1025x768 more so because its what the internet is designed around (yes its designed around widescreen now with adds but at 1025 horizontal it just hides the adds and shows you full content.

reason for this is 1080 is most common phone horizontal (portrate) resolution space.

it will stay at like 1024-1080 pixels across for literally decades now. iphones over 1440p don't sell and all the cheap ones that's like 80% of market use 1080p

honestly getting a CRT and running it at 120hz 1024x768 is basically free AdBlock with no performance loss like real adblock its really comfy and nice to use highly recommend this or getting a 1080p screen and putting it in portrait for net viewing if you despise CRT for non logical reasons.

I use 1360x768

God said to create the operating system with 640x480, 16 colors display and a single audio voice.

If less pixels means less power usage (does it?) and significantly less cost than I'm okay with it in a

1600x900 masterrace

Attached: 1534212406661.jpg (240x320, 25K)

5:4 was disgusting

>tfw I have this exact resolution right now in front of me when I'm using my X230
The full HD mod sounds too risky, I'd rather upgrade the whole device if there's something equally good out there. My only comfort is that this is a 12" device so the pixels are pretty small even with this resolution.

Attached: 1516403128148.jpg (736x825, 66K)

>2003
>1600x1200 on a 15inch laptop display

>2018
>1366x768 on a 22inch TFT still widely available

>X230

For some reason Lenovo always picked the most DISGUSTING displays for their lineups. Even the more expensive ones was absolute shit to what you could have in some middle class consumer crap.

Mine is the IPS model though, it doesn't look bad when browsing but in black screen you can notice a ton of light bleeding from the edges. It doesn't show in normal use so it doesn't bother me much but... it could be better. The rest of the device is pretty nice and I would wish Lenovo would have continued making it but with better hardware. Nobody cares that it's a little thinner if it doesn't even have removable batteries. It's a 12" device, it's already very small. If I wanted a tablet I would get a tablet.

Perfection.

What's the story behind that 768p instead of just 720p? I can't imagine the visual difference is noticeable so what's the reason?

Shhhh you might trigger MUH DPI tards

I used to have a 768p monitor for years but then I upgraded to a 1080p monitor and I was like

Attached: happy sugar laifu.gif (768x432, 2.42M)

give me back 4:3 for fucks sake

>buying new hardware for private use at all

>laptop user
>still have a slappy new monitor from my old computer
>can't hook it up because my battlestation doesn't even have space for a mouse, let alone a monitor
Just fuck my shit up

>COMPANIES WILL SEE PEOPLE LIKE YOU BUYING THIS SHIT AND THINK "Oh we can actually get away with it haha".
Yeah I'm sure they watch my buying habits closely. Companies are stepping all over themselves to sell me indestructible serviceable laptops that don't throttle for $75. I'll upgrade it to the 1080p screen for the boost in brightness eventually. I'll upgrade to a SSD when they start selling when they quit sabotaging their factories and sell a TB drive for $40. Practically speaking that means I won't ever own one. I have 8GB of RAM and my uses 500MB. I have my entire /usr/bin and /usr/lib in RAM now.

The truth is that there's nothing we as consumers can do to get companies to make better hardware. People have become so emasculated they can't even carry a laptop with a real heatsink anymore. If we want better hardware in the future, then we're going to have to make it.

1280x1024

1920x1200 for larger displays

>arcades
Eh?

I did software dev at 800x600, kiddo, and it wasn't even true oldfag shit.

Attached: delphi 3 about.png (800x600, 10K)

based boomer

1440x900 is better for 14".

I decided against doing the FHD upgrade on my X220 for now, bought a S230U IPS panel instead.

can still run 1024x768 at native resolution, more vertical is never bad

This, I'd use 4:3 for desktop and 16:10 for laptop but of course everything has to be gay TV mind control box format.

they sent you a mangled one, mine got those only after 2 years of constant beatings, which has never happened on one same model that my brother just keeps at home

1440x900 is suffering

Fucking hell

As with all other things, shitty battery tech is holding us back. : C

768 is truly a godsend. Any resolution that requires UI scaling to be usable is shit-tier

my TV has this native resolution but om any distro or windows It only appears as 1360 no matter what I do
HELP

embrace it

>130MB RAM for w95

how decadent

In awe at the buyer's remorse on these lads.

5760 x 1080 is so much better than that weak cuck shit

lol no

My Dell Inspiron 3521 from 2013 had this res. Looks just about the same as my new Inspiron 5570 I got this year with a 1080p screen.

without windows and systemdicks bloat a 1or 2 tb mechanical drive is better than a 128gb ssd

>2048x1536 crt on desktop
>1920x1200 ips lcd on laptop
get on my level

Terry would suggest otherwise

sucks, but is the only way because there's more demand on 16:9

I can't go back after using a 17 inch laptop. I don't care if I look retarded pulling it out of my backpack.

I've got a 1920x1200 on my 12" laptop. Text and graphics look so sharp and crisp.

The pixel density is nice but I will trade it for the screen real estate.

>screen real estate
So resolution. People who think a 19" 1366x768 screen is "bigger" than a 12" 1920x1200 can get out.

x768 on a 22inch TFT still widely available
Where can you by this?

Walmart

Sure, to a certain extent.

I'll take a 1600x900 17inch over a 1920x1080 14inch any day though.

I have a Dell laptop from 2011 with a 1600x900 screen.it is honestly the worst overheating, crashing POS that it colors my perception of that particular resolution. 1366 can play 720p anime scaled perfectly, but 1600 reduces it to a blocky mess that is actually worse than plain 480 (inb4 autism filters and scalers that make my laptop crash)

Get some glasses gramps.

2560x1080 reporting in fuck resolutionlets
I run 5k down sampled

Fuck you I need the storage.

>why have 500 GB of storage when you can have 128 GB of EXTREMELY FAST STORAGE which will make gaymes load at very extremely fast speed, whoa
Kill yourself. I agree with the resolution though.