IPFS

Reminder that we need a /IPFS/ general

Jow Forums has to create an easy to understand guide to get people into IPFS so we can redpill the rest of this site to at least use it for file sharing.

Attached: 1511978333916.png (379x335, 17K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ipfs.io/
medium.com/coinmonks/how-to-add-site-to-ipfs-and-ipns-f121b4cfc8ee
github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/5383
github.com/libp2p/go-floodsub/pull/97
github.com/ipfs/archives/issues
pastebin.com/4eu4QdAN
pastebin.com/raw/d7knhF0W
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_(web_decentralization_project)
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

note that the official site: ipfs.io/ already has many great guides to check out. Another one to check out: medium.com/coinmonks/how-to-add-site-to-ipfs-and-ipns-f121b4cfc8ee

IPFS on its own is not enough. You need distributed applications. Maybe Urbit will deliver them.

>>coinmonks
opt in cryptominer botnet confirmed

zeronet?

So advanced it's naming less bit types by bigger real objects...

Can't they call it 16byte word instead of ship? Why everybody got to reinvent whole wording about how computation is done?

This, plus filecoin sounds like a nice way to ensure it's not just pedos hosting each other's CP like what happened with Freenet.

>inb4 "b-blockchain!! m-meme!!"
Unlike stuff like Skycoin, IPFS is conceptually completely separate from filecoin. It's just an extra incentive for normies to participate. It doesn't even need to be worth a lot on the Jow Forums tier exchanges - it could just function as a digital token much like reddit karma if IPFS ever gets big enough.

>This, plus filecoin sounds like a nice way to ensure it's not just pedos hosting each other's CP like what happened with Freenet.
I don't understand what you're trying to say here. Are you saying IPFS does not protect privacy so it makes it harder for people to host illegal stuff?

No, I'm saying the same guys are also making their own cryptocurrency that is "mined" passively using disk space ("Proof of Storage", I guess), the idea being that you'll get paid to dedicate a certain amount of storage to hosting and caching random IPFS objects. Which should in theory help increase adoption and make it spread more among normies (which is important, otherwise if you're always the only one hosting your objects because you're the only one using IPFS in the first place then that defeats the entire purpose).

In contrast, Freenet ended up being abandoned by almost everyone because nobody cared, except that pedophiles found it really convenient so they kept using it and it turned into something almost exclusively hosted by pedos for pedos.

>anonymity
IIRC ipfs has no built in anonymity, because it aims to follow UNIX philosophy. Last I checked they were working on tailored i2p support for that, but the advantage of this approach is you can just as well route it over Tor or anything else you want.

Any opinions on Tahoe-LAFS? Cursory research makes it sound pretty good too, but I almost never hear it discussed compared to IPFS.