Kills flash

>kills flash
>doesn't implement webm, the replacement

Attached: vp9 on 4chan.png (202x249, 41K)

Other urls found in this thread:

fsf.org/news/free-software-foundation-statement-on-webm-and-vp8
w0bm.com/980
w0bm.com/3201
twitter.com/AnonBabble

nothing can replace flash

sage retard

Win32

webm isn't a replacement for flash

HTML5 is, what if you want to utilize webm video in a HTML5 video game, hmm?

WebM isn’t a W3C web standard, it’s Google’s meme format. Literally the new RealMedia.

Webm is open sourced. There is no reason why it shouldn't be standard.

>Webm is open sourced

So is x264. What’s your point?

Apple Loss Audio Codec is Open Source and everybody raves about that. However they've got patents you've got to pay for, so their open sourcing really only made their money making meme format more widespread.

I never heard anything about this Apple Loss Audio Codec.

Apple is a pretty big deal here in the west.

This.

What's the purpose of webm? The VP8 and VP9 codecs? They are worse than h.265, they require the h.265 patents, the end.

Why do patents even exist in the year 2018?

>vpx requires h.26x patents
lmao, retard literally doesn't know what he's talking about

>invent something
>sell it
>chinks sell a rip-off that's cheaper because they didn't need to spend money for R&D
Say what you want about patents, at least they're not as egregious as copyright where Disney lobbying has extended it from 20 years to literal centuries. The real problem are the patent trolls.

>>chinks sell a rip-off that's cheaper because they didn't need to spend money for R&D
As a counterargument, the rip off will always be inferior quality to the original. A genuine product can last a lifetime while the chinese ripoff can last only a few months to at best a year or two.

>However they've got patents you've got to pay for
>After initially keeping it proprietary from its inception in 2004, in late 2011 Apple made the codec available open source and royalty-free
so, something that iturds only cared was released without royalties because noone cared about it.

>being stupid

webm is trash

>Thinking name calling is an argument

Fidget cubes

Chinks are just an example. Consider a competitor thst has the same manufacturing capacity as you. They're still going to sell it for cheaper or the same price but with higher quality because they didn't need to bear the brunt of R&D cost. Stop being stupid.

Right. That's why every single ripoff in china is always garbage because they cut corners with making it. A $100 watch that's supposed to be several thousand dollars breaks in a week? What were the odds of that.

China is just a fucking example, you absolute retard. Right now, their IP theft is agaibst the law. Obviously, chinks are going to be penny pinching fucks but I was no longer talking about china but a hypothetical competitor. The only reason why this hypothetical competitor doesn't exist is because of patent laws that are in place. Once you get rid of patent law, what's stopping anyone from selling an item of similar quality at a cheaper price?

People will still prefer to buy the cheaper product despite the quality it has. They can just buy the cheap one again if it breaks. This has been proven for a long time.
That's why patents will always be needed despite there are the patent trolls.

>They are worse than h.265, they require the h.265 patents, the end.
That's bullshit. WebM is even endorsed by FSF.
fsf.org/news/free-software-foundation-statement-on-webm-and-vp8

Attached: 1538443543815.png (263x240, 111K)

>webm

4chinz is the only site on the internet using webm, only because jewgle bribed moot

w0bm.com

kys slav whore
Back in the basement we would've doxed you and shared your russian bank number

w0bm.com/980

>Country 404
>bank number
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Are you retarded? speak english you attention whore

420 REKT

w0bm.com/3201

They should exist, but expire in a year if they haven't been used. aplel alone has thousands of unused patents that someone probably wants to use.

since when webm is a replacement for flash

>They are worse than h.265,
they're not
>they require the h.265 patents
they don't

>published 2010
vp8 is shit now.
vp9 is better and still crap compared to h.265

av1 is the actual future though, not google's meme codecs.

I thought av1 was just google rebranding their next meme codec because people were catching on to them ridiculously overpromising on every single previous one. What's changed this time?

most of the usual contributors to MPEG have joined the AOmedia train.

The AOM is made up of Google and big corporations that are not Google.

>what's the difference between a spec/standard and one implementation
go ahead, use h264 on a big website, the jews will come to get their money one way or another

>webm
>replacement of flash
What the fuck am I reading

A pleb that doesn't know the difference between an applet, a media player, a container a format and a codec.

>an applet
You're a fucking applet, you fucking microshitlet

I actually meant "web-applet" which is what Flash, ultimately, was.