Thoughts on alt-tech?

>betamax
OP anally annihilated. Unrecoverable.

>A Googlejeet would know what a betamax is.

Attached: Chuckles Mutantly.gif (320x272, 2.71M)

>free speech platform
More like Jow Forums's hugboxes

The point of social media is getting information. You need millions of users to give you the best important.

thisthisthis. every 'alternate' tech site that stylises itself as valuing freedom of speech I've seen became infested with incels and neonazis and pedophiles within a few weeks, if it didn't just flat out die because it didn't really have an audience. the "it's like facebook but for $group!" of nerds desu

The response to social media being shit should be to stop wasting your time on it, not to desperately try and build some that more specifically echo your own beliefs in hopes that that will somehow add something to your life.

Bitchute isn't bad tech wise. The rest are garbage.

Isn't minds.com owned by some shady fucks who also own porn sites

I'm not part of the alt-right so I don't need alt-tech

>More like Jow Forums's hugboxes
Jow Forums does get kicked off everywhere for their opinions.
If anything most sites are prejudiced against them.

>There are people here actually bootlicking big corporations

Attached: __original_drawn_by_40hara__81b97bbdf0d79aba25d813d84fce0e1c.jpg (854x1000, 93K)

>mfw a pajeet made gab but it's users are altright

>he unironically believes this
Lmao

>big social media sites don't ban hate speech

The real redpill is no-tech

it's good that there's alternative to stuff. keeps tech giants on their heels.

>Twitter
>Literally who website instead of RSS
The only thing Twitter is good for is following accounts for updates. Which RSS already did much better.
Want to comment? Just add mailing list integration.

`alt' just means same shit different shovel and will ultimately result in all the same terriblenesses
real freedom will only come from nonparticipation in retarded/evil things

It's a good first try, but eventually you need to aim for complete decentralization.

They are probably also linuxtards

We shouldn't have to define platforms that were not funded with CIA money as "alt-tech"

Youtube and twitter are too big to have actual competition. Also as long as those platforms are subject to laws regarding what they're allowed to host it's not actually "free" it's just a different set of moral standards.

>bitchute
Bloated website behind a fuck ton of (((Cloudflare))) JavaScript. It's not a serious alternative to YouTube, especially not a "freedom" one.

nobody besides nazis care enough about your privacy or free speech to get off of googleshit

>Why won’t this corporation let me use its free platform to harass people and promote batshit conspiracy theories among other mentally unstable losers like me? Investigate #Pizzagate, muh free speech, muh SJW, DA JOOZ !!!!!!!

gab and minds is gay, bitchute is alright

>go to any facebook/twitter/reddit alternative site
>front page is nothing but nigger nigger faggot nigger

>Youtube and twitter are too big to have actual competition.
microsoft will make a youtube clone soon.

shut up fagets

seething bug

stop spreading fake news faget

sorry man, until BSD becomes as serious a gaming platform as Linux, I will remain using Linux

sauce?

There's still the problem of trying to get people to switch and people not wanting to miss out on all the massive backlog. A MS one would likely have all the same annoyances as well like being tied into an ecosystem and needing to be advertiser/social justice friendly.

All three of those are just white supremacist echochambers

So is Jow Forums

it wasn't always this way

Jow Forums is for general contrarianism

>Microsoft
>not fucking it up
Microsoft's currently on a role where everything they do is handled like Google handled Wave.

I'm still salty.

No, Jow Forums is for NEET incel trolls and always has been. The bullshit of Gamergate turned them into an angry mob of losers willing to follow any con-man or propagandist who would tell them it’s someone else’s fault.

twatter is cancer to use desu

>nazis care [...] about your privacy or free speech
lmao

All generally good ideas but get a bad rap because they allow speech people don't like. Just look at this thread.

>muh partisan tech
Go shill somewhere else Jow Forumsso.

>partisan
>free speech
nice lol

>shitpost everywhere
>openly advocating for the extermination of minorities
>asking for SJWXYZ123 hitjobs
>BAWWW WE DINDU NUFFINS
The Jow Forums kool aid seeps and rots everything it touched.

So you don't support free speech. We get it.
Twitter's leftist hugbox should suit you just fine.

those are just poltard echo chambers.
peertube, diaspora, GNU Social/Mastadon on the other hand are pretty neat.

>so is Jow Forums
Get a load of this snowflake. Sorry palso, but a single shit board does not represent the site. Jow Forums is not your hugbox.

Attached: 1499628897125.jpg (980x1200, 306K)

You’re free to buy your own servers and bandwidth anytime pal.

>minorities
Soi doublethink

Attached: 1510080792157.jpg (1524x934, 76K)

>GNU Social/Mastadon
They have a pretty bad nazi "problem" too, friend.
>You’re free to buy your own servers and bandwidth anytime pal.
No, I'm not.
If I wanted to host a free speech platform I would get censored like everyone else is already.

gotta need a sauce on those numbers pal

>I would get censored?

By whom?

I agree, deliberately breaking community rules, threatning others deserves and hijacking platforms to push supremacist propaganda is the purest form of freedom of speech. Too bad the jew man be keeping us revolutionary visionary incel NEETS down >:(((

Attached: IMG20160901WA0013.jpg (261x216, 10K)

>payment processors
>hosting providers
>DNS providers
>domain registrars
basically anyone who could

>people are prejudiced against my prejudice!

>The population of Europe in 2015 was estimated to be 741 million according to the United Nations, which was slightly less than 11% of the world population

the population of europe and population or european descent are two different things

>doesn't understand how percentages work
Oh watch out, the Jow Forums scholar is busting out his propagraphic.jpg master thesis.

Factor in darkies residing in the Western Europe and you'll have ~9%.

You could do all those yourself too. Are you sure you’re not just a lazy mooching loser?

If you are prejudiced you are prejudiced

Attached: cutie.jpg (600x600, 30K)

>you're counting it wrong
>California is a majority-minority state

Attached: 1525111729478.png (1291x983, 219K)

Attached: 1519196373849.jpg (480x953, 323K)

>deliberately breaking community rules
amren.com/commentary/2018/09/how-twitter-promotes-verified-hate/
> threatning others
Not allowed anywhere.
> hijacking platforms to push supremacist propaganda
Posting things that hurt your feelings isn't "hijacking" anything. Propaganda or not.
Take a look at trump's twitter, spammed with lefty propaganda. Should they all get banned for "hijacking" his twitter?
>dude, just, like, invest millions of dollars into infrastructure so you can have ur own internet lol what's so hard about that???
fuck off

That's just you making guesses now

>Private companies MUST serve me because I’m white and entitled!

Go back to bed Alex

it used to be

man that picture is depressing

Yeah, I'm definitely hiding here that whites are secretly the most dominant population-wise group on the planet, brainlet.

OK, just wait until someone decides to bust some monopolies and lay down some shall not censor law.

>leftie in charge of sucking corporate dicks
sasuga

>help me gubment

>threatning others
>Not allowed anywhere.

Right, which is why Twitter is a cesspit of alt-right trolls regularly doxxing and sending death threats to anyone who said something that hurt their fee-fees

>help me coc

>Right, which is why Twitter is a cesspit of alt-right trolls regularly doxxing and sending death threats to anyone who said something that hurt their fee-fees
Same thing with leftists on twitter. They dox and harass anyone they don't like. They send death threats.
Isn't allowed either way.

>We need a Fairness Doctrine for the internet !!!!!

lmao @ u

>muy both sides

Abuse and harassment is overwhelmingly perpetrated by the right. Trolling and doxxing are unequivocally their M.O.

Prove it. You can't.
Leftists media outlets openly dox people, and support doxing.
Leftists go on doxing campaigns to get people fired.

Not even close to the same thing. You don't have to follow anyone on social media.

Attached: TwitterData1-01.png (1920x1125, 714K)

Social media companies also don’t like it when Nazis, trolls, and conspiracy theorists shit up their site and make it look bad.

Under what law does Twitter have to give Alex Jones a platform?

You're missing the point entirely.
What does your post have to do with anything?
Censorship is OK since it's not the government? Is that what you're trying to say here?
Care to explain?
In the post chain you're replying to, I already suggested they could bust big companies up or implement some kind of law that protects speech on those platforms.

If you don't like censorship, print your own newspaper.

Suck off a shotgun bootlicker.
I hope big tech gets regulated.
Fuck you.

Edgy teenager spotted

What's the fucking point?, all they do is imitate mainstream tech while advertising less censorship, but without really addressing the reasons why regular platforms are being censored in the first place, is doomed to follow the same path just with an agenda of different color.

why the fuck are you talking about whites? That's not the point of the discussion. Nobody is talking about race here, what's your problem? welp anyway, gonna unwatch this thread since this discussion isn't getting anywhere, have a nice day

What, is there some sort of law against publishing your own website? Man, it sure would suck if there was some kind of government enforcement that would have people come round and break your legs if you said stupid things on the internet. So that would happen, right? If you made your own website?

Basically what you're complaining about is that Jimmy isn't letting you use his printing press any more, not that the government is physically stopping you from printing what you want. You're just to dumb, lazy, etc, etc, to print your own.

Why are you so averse to entrepreneurialism and boot-strapping? Surely there must be enough Nazis on which to build a successful media business. Or are you just a lazy entitled dipshit?

Back in my day it'd cost literally tens of dollars to own a printing press. Back then ten dollars was like $10,000 today, but still. Good old Ben Franklin was spinning up his printing press but he was a rich motherfucker who could afford that shit. It must have cost me at least $30 ($30 in today's money) to grab a domain and start hosting shit on it.

>nazis
>free-speech
user-kun...