HOW WILL SSD EVER RECOVER?

128GB of RAMdisk would be sublime man (for only $1200 kek)
With the option of having an autonomous power supply. Literally no I/O bottleneck, shit's instantaneous.

i want to marry shizuku

By being 25x-50x cheaper

>turn off
Why would you do that when you can suspend it?

>not using Kurei Kei edition

>bikini theme

This is what we need for our computers in the near future of space travel for whites only

>bikini theme
who? kurei kei or shizuku?
post it here

>kurei kei
an cute

Attached: bikini.png (1005x692, 524K)

Is there a way to use a ramdisk with its full potential these days ?
I have 64 GB of ram so I have plenty to spare

HOW??

slut

RAMdisk

I luv it

look..... I benchmarked my RAMdisk

fuck off fagget

>he doesn't ramdisk MINIX in his L3 cache
It's like you WANT a slow computer

Attached: 1495845024334.jpg (618x911, 73K)

Question here: can the CPU even follow if you use a RAMDISk or does it become a bottleneck?

Dunno, maybe someone more knowledgeable can answer your question

kurei kei based gril
i don't remember her bikini theme because i use standard theme

>L3 cache
how

Attached: Send help.jpg (394x319, 120K)

yikes

Please do not post pictures of my wife Misaka. Thank you.

Depends on the RAM speed, channels and latency from RAM to CPU.
When intel and AMD started doing multi core cpus (3-4 cores) they had to integrate RAM controller into the CPU. And then the memory sticks have become the bottleneck, most of the time due to latency. So that's why if you have a lot of cores you want to even more cache inside the CPU and crazy fast memory, preferably multi chnnel memory (for 16 core 32 thread CPU you'd want at least 8 channel memory if it's clocked at anything fater than about 2.5GHz).

So, if you have Threadripper 2 with 32 cores, or EPYC with even more cores. Then 2GB 2400MHz stick of RAM might be a bottleneck (still depends on type of calculation, maybe your data can be cached into the CPU so RAM doesnt matter, but I dont believe such case ever happening).

So, basically: you want many memory channels, really low latency, hight troughtput, and huge cache in CPU.
This way memory can't be a bottleneck (until you'll pack 8x512 MB of ram which is totally retarted because this way your memory is fragmented all of the sicks which makes cpu wait until it can hop from one stick to another asking for data, wasting this way time and inreasing latency, because its just waiting for the data).

tldr: In your PC with fast multichannel ram it's not, but if you're running amd EPYC with 32+ cores then you might want to read about it somewhere else, maybe buy yourself a book about CPU design or computer architecture.

I hope I helped you a little bit.

is this the official crystaldiskmark thread

Attached: Disk Mark 9-20-2018.png (402x367, 38K)

Not even on the same scale, at that level it starts boiling down to access times. Typical DDR4 has ~120ns access times, where the L1 cache is probably

Reporting in, here's mine

Attached: ss (2018-10-07 at 21.41.05).png (400x320, 24K)

gas the fucking weebs

Attached: 4ddcf63138202ee1887f94bf8ae805b8.jpg (640x960, 58K)

> the power of open source

>suspend it
why would you do that when you can turn off monitor?

>only 4GB

It's time to go back.

Please show me a workload where
>copy from ssd
>do work in ram
>write back to ssd
That's actually quicker than just doing the work off the ssd.
>b-but my leet cracker hashing
Doesn't have the third step of writing back to disk. Show me a productivity workload that actually benefits from ramdisk.

anime weebsite

gas the fucking normalfags.

why dont they make actual RAM drives that have cheapo backup SSD for persistence?

Crucial's Momentum Cache does something similar to this with a regular SSD.

only 1.5gig/s? i would have thought ram be faster than that

>over 2GB/s random 4k read
No no storage bottleneck ever again

shh, my origianl idea NO STEAL!

That's random 4k read/write buddy

but there's no mechanical parts in a ram to make random access slower?

so you're never seen a ramdownloader. listen there sweetie while i tell you everything about it cause i'm so cool and i happened to google wikipedia article about it before our conversation.

It's like the speed of light has its limits or something

why would you write it back to the ssd ? you can do everything on the ramdisk

Imagine 256GB of L1 cache memory

whats a good ramdisk software ?

>storing directly to core
no go away

sourceforge.net/projects/imdisk-toolkit/

He's only doing it to engineer a point. Even he won't do this himself.

I dont want a bug filled unreliable mess

that's why I recommended that. it just werks.

DOESN'T MATTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thumbnail generation on Windows 10 File Explorer will be just as slow as a mechanical hard drive

NTFS a shit

Yeah they use a small ramdisk as cache. Samsung and all the other vendors have this I believe.

But all your shit will be fucked if there's a power outage in your house because the cached files in the RAM will not be saved

Almost

Attached: turn-off-computer-19431260.png (500x1080, 246K)