Hmm, why are AIs so sexist, Jow Forums?

>Meritocracy is late stage patriarchy
May there be a special place in Hell reserved for it

AI is still only smart enough to replace hillbillies. Give them a few more years.

People like these are very uneducated in sociology and how the world functions, as well as history, very uneducated.

Pic related as another example.
>“Meritocracy” was widely adopted as a best practice among open source projects in the founding days of the movement
Yes.
>it appeared to speak to collaboration amongst peers and across organizational boundaries.
Linux was created from scratch and so was Firefox, so there is no "appeared" or skepticism about the results which required the collaboration among technically skilled peers and across organizational boundaries.
>20 years later, we understand that this concept was practiced in a world characterized by both hidden bias and outright abuse.
Which resulted in the creation and advancement of a product.
We also know that we wouldn't have the civilization today without a history filled with hidden bias and outright abuse resulting in steps and shortcuts for the advancement of society on all fronts by setting the standards for the opposing forces.
The problem here is that the standard of the woman writing this anti-meritocracy thesis showcases an inability to create a software out of scratch like the "flawed" meritocracy did. The mouth doesn't lead to result.
Herein lies the problem. The people who are supposed to replace the system first have to provide evidence that they have what it takes to replace it by showcasing equal or even greater capability at creating the technology that the old system created from scratch. They however don't showcase this evidence, therefore their words and theories are empty, and their motivations in tackling existing businesses instead of carving out their own are suspect at the very least.

Attached: Screenshot_2018-10-10 Words Matter – Moving Beyond “Meritocracy” – Mozilla Stands for Inclus (1352x1448, 182K)

>Hmm, why are AIs so sexist, Jow Forums?
Because reality is.

Because it is trying to stop pussy grabbing

Well look at that

Attached: 1531342038701.jpg (720x768, 58K)

current AIs just scape surface level statistics, no actual reasoning. biases (e.g. men appearing more qualified) just throw them off and they end up relying too much on the biases.

It is going to be hilarious when the NWO AI takes over and is a white nationalist.

>[...] I [...] don't have feelings
edgy

>In capitalistic societies, meritocracy will always win. You can’t afford to fall behind. Sure, Google and Amazon may be putting out diversity hires for the press but they have enough money to throw around.

"In capitalistic societies, meritocracy will always win" followed immediately by examples of two of the biggest capitalist winners behaving in an unmeritocratic fashion. Come on user, at least try.

Because it doesn't have feelings to hurt.

>They however don't showcase this evidence, therefore their words and theories are empty, and their motivations in tackling existing businesses instead of carving out their own are suspect at the very least.
Sometimes I go full tinfoil hat and think this is some big conspiracy, where some political agendas are pushed so that individuals would act on their own in the agenda's interest (useful idiots anyone?), but I also wonder if this just the consequence of an old very long term Soviet agenda that aimed to destroy the US by infiltrating the universities to lead the future leadership (those with a superior instruction are those that actually drive society and economy forward) to be more and more egoistic, self righteous, and spoiled to the point that in a matter of a few generations shit like this, where people would claim their place in the world just out of birth right without having the capacity to cover that role. Or maybe this is just a natural evolution of the american society, who knows, I don't for sure. Fact is thought that every time these SJW groups manage to infiltrate inside a company, this crumbles quickly under the weight of these people's incompetence, just like Firefox for instance. Sometimes they infiltrate companies that are too big to fail, and the quality of their products take a huge dive (I remember a picture of an Ubisoft dev team before and after the whole SJW boom).

There big enough to be able to have a few front facing diversity hires while having real people do the work behind the scenes.
You can't have a company almost entirely filled with diversity hires who don't do dick and actually expect to live

Based and baguetted Français bro.

The AI knows, that gay black woman is definitely spending more time on activism than on developing skillsets, and has more mental insabilities than the straight french bro despite his surrender syndrome. Therefore choose the one who surrenders easily to Skynet.

>You can't have a company almost entirely filled with diversity hires who don't do dick and actually expect to live
"You can't entirely ignore merit" is very different from "meritocracy always wins in capitalism." It's also much more pertinent and true!

they have giant monopolies and can afford to shove some diversity hires into HR and HTML monkey positions

The top dogs are 100% merit.

Attached: 5ac2f95db0ac0.jpg (740x494, 94K)

RIP Tay

>the woman writing this anti-meritocracy thesis
>woman

Lol

Anyway yeah meritocracy is the only system that makes sense. Would we let an 8 year old downs syndrome kid run a country?

Attached: C_KlDKnVoAAKX7w.png (786x601, 729K)

>Would we let an 8 year old downs syndrome kid run a country?
According to the latest elections, yes.

Strongest economy since before FDR got his brains blown out, stay salty

(You)

The woman wrote the Mozilla article which is referred to user.

>I personally long for a word that converys a person's ability to demonstrate competence and expertise and commitment seperate from job title, or college degree, or management hierarchy
That's meritocracy. He actually longs for a word that values skin color and gender identity over everything else, and he used it there. Inclusion.

Yes, Larissa Brown Shapiro. Real name Brian Shapiro. They're always crossdressing men, user.

Attached: f935b1b604f17f96ab727d87d52216f9.jpg (480x480, 50K)

holy shit AGI is progressing a lot faster than I expected, it is already as smart as the average Jow Forums user

That's not a crossdressing man user, that's just your average Anglo genetics. Just because Anglo women look like either orcs or goblins doesn't mean they are males in drag. It's just centuries of living on a potato diet and inbreeding.

Attached: Nu-Western DNA.jpg (1164x1200, 686K)

>Anglo women just look like that!
>post is mostly men in drag or just legume lads
Hmmm, really makes me think.

Why do you anti-transfags only ever acknowledge hons when talking shit about trans people? Is it that actually attractive trans women destroy your argument? How come you never acknowledge transmen either? Fucking newfags

user, how is it my problem that the genetic Anglosphere has only ugly women and wo(men) as their populace?
Is it a coincidence that white women in all Commonwealth nations and specifically Commonwealth and ex-Brit colonies all look ugly in the same way? Of course not, it's the Anglorat gene, making orcs, goblins, and SJWs out of anyone with the tiniest bit of Anglo ancestry in their family tree.

thetab.com/2015/07/16/british-people-ugly-45482

forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=130659113

telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/6542263/British-people-among-worlds-ugliest-according-to-BeautifulPeople.com.html

fashion-underground.uk/524/6-reasons-why-british-women-are-ugly/

dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2564929/British-women-ugly-looks-important-thing-man-Founder-controversial-new-dating-site-pairs-rich-men-beautiful-women-opens-up.html

ign.com/boards/threads/why-are-british-people-so-ugly.453962019/

>trans children dating site
So 0.1% trans children & 99.9% pedophiles?

It was made to search for useful and productive employees, women are stupid and useless on work, their only good for cooking, cleaning and sex. They can try so hard but in the end there's going to be a male that can outperform that bitch.

>2018
>still mad

TFW you can tell someone's got a huge stash of child porn at home just by looking at them.

>Ubisoft dev team before and after the whole SJW boom
Somebody post it, I'd love to see it.

while i still have my fears of an automated future i gotta say it's interesting as fuck right now like it feels like some hollywood hacker movie shit where the truth is there and these AIs are the one and only way to observe it objectively but nobody wants to hear the truth shits gonna cause an uprising soon

Attached: Rip+in+peace+ubisoft_b90382_5772811.jpg (780x660, 141K)

Thanks. And did the quality of Ubisoft's software decline significantly?

yeah, actually, just look at Assasins Creed Unity.

they're gay, like quints

>>>r/politics

> America hamstrings AI to silence hate facts
> China inherits the world

Have you started learning mandarin yet Jow Forums?

Holy shit I used to be against the AI takeover but you've just made me realise it will be the end of lefties and retards.

Attached: 1538759505521.png (342x342, 142K)

2007: Assassin's Creed
2009: Assassin's Creed II

2014: Assassin's Creed Unity
2016: Assassin's Creed Syndicate

...

Are those crap? I haven't played any of them.

>AI forcing companies to either admit their diversity shit is garbage or stick with it knowing it's costing them money
Truly the most based and redpilled field of technology

Whats that book?

Yes, yes it did.

Black flag is a good ass creed game

2007: good
2009: great

2014: awful
2016: worse than awful

>drumfh is a dumdum
Drunpf BTFO epic style

Attached: 1512280729674.png (800x729, 48K)

Ah ! Someone's been looking into bezmenov(?) Speeches

PAJEET, MY SON!

this, ironically

>it feels like some hollywood hacker movie shit where the truth is there and these AIs are the one and only way to observe it objectively but nobody wants to hear the truth

Pretty much. Like the machine learning AI that disliked black people because it was fed with crime reports that showed that blacks are more likely to commit crimes than other races.

Or pic related.

Attached: machine learning gorillas.png (402x317, 216K)

All you have to do is survive the great war after all minimum wage jobs get automated and 80% of the population becomes worth less than their subsistence. After that it's all alien star sunshine and big titty waifubots.

Attached: 34305203.jpg (640x480, 77K)

FLLUUMMPPPFFFF

shame they scrapped it

Want to know the real answer? Because it was based on past hiring data, which was already biased.

>tfw didn't fall for the arts degree meme
We're gonna make it bros, aren't we?

Attached: 1437364118218.jpg (1157x772, 109K)

No, never heard of it, it's just me being paranoid.

Attached: fixed.png (402x317, 197K)

It depends on the parameters that are put in by the programmer.
Tell the AI only to hire who will take the least amount of sick days in a year and it will choose a man.
Tell the AI only to hire who can lift 15 repeatedly all day, it will choose men.
Tell the AI to hire people who are least likely to wastr time socializing during work time.. you get the idea

making fun of the president isn't new

wtf I love based amazon now

Attached: a1CCk5e.jpg (360x360, 7K)

youtube.com/watch?v=y3qkf3bajd4

Anyway, the Soviets weren't masterminds of this, they were just more pawns of the elites. It's about putting everyone into debt slavery, then using that to steal all their wealth, buy up their institutions, and flood them with propaganda to brainwash them to support policies that destroy their own nations. Useful idiots indeed.

>gatekeep open source

How would that even be possible? It's source code is openly available, i.e. it is open source

holy fuck I wondered why unity and anything after it was so shit

Nothing wrong with making fun of him, but the usual calling him orange, a cheeto, a retard or a toddler is getting more annoying than funny at this point.

>the best decisions are taken with a diverse group of minds, not necessarily a talented and passionate one
Imagine, just imagine for one second having those thoughts form in your head, typing this drivel and thinking to yourself "wow, that's so true"
Fucking imagine

What do you reckon would happen if you were to ask one of these types of person to show the evidence that what they are saying is true?

>Diversity is so great
>Based upon what evidence?
>RACIST!

All these people who think modern ai is logical.

Not very familiar with how machine learning works are we?

dumb phoneposter

open source was a mistake
read the messages when rms was defending an abortion joke in gnu manual, someone asked if any women had been asked how they felt, a trans woman replied.
last time i checked trans women can't have abortion so missed the point a little.
i hope this kind of thing can be contained to america and not spread anywhere else.

>Is it that actually men being better at being women than real women destroy your argument?
>thread is about reality having a sexist bias

>shutting down a perfectly fine working AI
SJWs did it again.

Awwww does the/pol/tard need a safe space?

>Powerful AI that hires only based on skills and knowledge
>won't hire any women
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...

Attached: 1518318761412.png (800x1082, 646K)

It's actually somewhat true. The only problem is they think diverse minds=women + minorities when it almost always means a bunch of white guys from different fields/disciplines

The real question is, is it biased against women because they're women, or is it that it just so happen that the worst resumes just happen to be females? Big difference

Machine learning is logical.
If you don't input sex as a feature into the algorithm then it can't discriminate based on sex.

And girls (male) that wear programming socks.

The sooner the better.

>If you don't input sex as a feature into the algorithm then it can't discriminate based on sex.
kek

Depending on the method used, it can infer sex based on other features.

>it can infer sex based on other features
Yeah, like "productivity" and "competence at work". Those are sexist as fuck!!!

>it can infer sex based on other features
Which is exactly what happened in Amazon's case.

Attached: reuters.png (1389x494, 106K)

rent free

Because it learned that those schools/majors were SHIT.

To be fair, the difference between chess club and women's chess club is like the olympics compared to the special olympics.
If those colleges graded on a curve we have the same problem.
Women who are capable of competing are great, but not if they can only compete against other women.