Now that the Firefox project is dying, the forks will end up being insufficient, do we end up with just Chrome-based as a viable browser platform?
Do you see another open-source project taking form?
Browser thread
Aiden Watson
Other urls found in this thread:
Chase Cruz
Wtf, how can someone sane can be against meritocracy
Jackson Brown
Exactly.
Kayden Perez
Jose Roberts
Leftshits came to the realization that most of their pet constituencies garner no merit.
Nicholas Ross
>Wtf, how can someone sane can be against meritocracy
When you can't compete.
The thing is, anyone that studies the subject for one day realize that if you enable a meritocracy... let's say that "some groups" end up at the top, and "some other groups" stay at the bottom.
And, well, when you're a marxist, it's not acceptable.
Dominic Perez
>postmeritocracy.org
>It is time that we as an industry abandon the notion that merit is something that can be measured
Levi Brooks
Chrome and the Chromium project have been into the post-meritoctacy nonsence for longer, stop astroturfing and shilling for Google
Caleb Long
I've been using a Firefox-fork for a while, but when Firefox will die, I don't know what I will use.
Maybe Ungoogled-Chromium.
Ayden Sullivan
>do we end up with just Chrome-based as a viable browser platform
except they are not. it's a choice of the less evil less garbage less SJW infected crap. Google is a lot worse than Mozilla in many ways.
When you say "chrome-based", that doesn't really matter. If some viable fork were made of any of them it would be preferable. If someone donated a billion dollars to the FSF with the task of forking a browser and making it privacy oriented then it wouldn't really matter if they forked firefox or chrome
Parker Phillips
ungoogled-chromium it's still Chromium, by using Chrom* you further support Google entrenching itself as the sole browser vendor who dictates opaque web standards
You also support leftism, cultural Marxism and post-meritocracy nonsense
By using Firefox at least you support open standards, so sane people can implement browsers that aren't pushing a cultural Marxist agenda
In the future people will make supported and actively developed Firefox forks, if Mozilla does kill itself
Grayson Robinson
It just leads to arguments about if Stallman or Torvalds is better.
Stallman is.
Isaac Scott
Two tasks confront those who hate the servitude to which the industrial system is reducing the human race. First, we must work to heighten the social stresses within the system so as to increase the likelihood that it will break down or be weakened sufficiently so that a revolution against it becomes possible.
Isaiah Lee
Not reading the pictured article.
Jaxson Sullivan
>DiVERSiTY
Fucking leftists.
Liam Smith
You know what's even better?
Guess who wrote that manifesto?
Elijah Lee
If you're really so much for meritocracy, why do you care that SJW's make Firefox? The end product is great. Shouldn't you judge it by its merits, according to your own standards?
Thomas Cook
>You know what's even better?
That it's coming to a Linux distribution near you? :^)
Joseph White
>why do you care that SJW's make Firefox? The end product is great.
It is because those that made this great product aren't the SJW that are there today.
It's the men that were there before.
Now SJW are in charge and fucking things up.
It'll die soon, unfortunately.
Grayson Wright
why is less diversity a problem?
Camden Lee
No no, they've been at Mozilla for a long time enough to make Quantum, which is better than any version made by the "men that were there before".
Brody Garcia
At least, there is a 50% chance that this particular individual will kill itself soon.
Nathan Williams
OP predicts Firefox will go downhill.
That's entirely different from saying it sucks right now.
Bentley Sanders
Like in genetics, same-alike people get same-alike ideas and end up producing retarded stuff.
Joseph Lopez
>bowser thread
>not a single bowser posted
Parker Rivera
Because marxism.
Kevin Reed
Basically none of them are in actual engineering positions at Mozilla
Asher Long
Yes, and that's exactly why nothing was ever created before the 1900's.
Ryder Myers
the stuff was just more retarded
Connor Perry
Irrelevant when he already did plenty of damage.
Mason Wright
"We believe that interpersonal skills are at least as important as technical skills" so no more autism? Sounds very prejudiced.
Nathaniel Sullivan
>so no more autism? Sounds very prejudiced.
You sound very insecure.
Isaiah Wright
They're going to make it so it matters not who's able to keep a project alive, they'll place two monkeys in there and hope to allah that it will work somehow.
Is. Is. Currently. At the present moment. If you personally were given responsibility over something, but you spent your entire life being irresponsible and trying to find ways to force others to adapt to you being irresponsible, you wouldn't be able to handle it.
It's not a matter of "SJWs are working on this project". It's a matter of them taking decisions based upon their own ideology and not putting politics aside. At that point they're going to stop caring about whether an individual can actually do the job or not. At that point it's all a matter of pure luck. Any perfectly good software can be destroyed and remodeled into an absolute piece of garbage and this has happened before.
Dylan Young
Everything is politics. Arguing in favor of bringing back meritocracy or whatever it is you're more comfortable with, is politics.
Adrian Gonzalez
reminder that this moz://a web design is cancer and has marked the death of mozilla