What's the middle ground between proprietary and open source?
What's the middle ground between proprietary and open source?
Jonathan Lee
Liam Ramirez
free for personal non comercial use
Jose Harris
Creating the code for yourself and closing it
Or auditing the open source, fork it make changes and close it for personal use
Liam Brown
Stop saying "open source", you retarded corporate whore.
Brayden King
foss proprietary
right wrong
good evil
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Ian King
Every other file being open source
John Hill
I like this
Blake Cruz
A) piracy - no cost still proprietary
B) expensive, custom support contract - you can request changes, ask the code to be customized, but it will never be yours
Carson Martin
stealing
Connor Brown
I think shared source, like Microsoft does where you can see the source but its not free to use or distribute.
Evan Diaz
Kinda what I was going for with B
Robert Bennett
There is no middle ground.
You're either in the botnet or you're not.
Carson Powell
Doesn't exist. Either use open source software or you might as well just not use a PC at all.
Logan Taylor
Open core
Zachary Perez
>foss
>not floss
Evan Peterson
I don't like it, it makes my gums bleed
Michael King
Open source that you buy
Dominic Myers
"free" software with patent bombs and binary blobs, Linux is a prime example of it.
Christian Phillips
>floss
dumb zoomer
Jaxon Sanchez
Shareware. It died.
Dominic Morales
open source software containing (((blobs)))