OpenBSD 6.4 has been released!

IT'S HAPPENING

>Announcement on the mailing lists
marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=153987076201158&w=2

>What's new
openbsd.org/64.html

>New artwork with Puffy wearing a tinfoil hat
openbsd.org/

>I feel safer now
openbsd.org/images/Puffoil.jpg

Attached: ppuf800X725.gif (800x725, 293K)

Other urls found in this thread:

openbsd.org/innovations.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Ye but them drivers tho (or lack thereof)

>New artwork with Puffy wearing a tinfoil hat

Kek at the self-depreciating humor.

When I’m doubt, pledge it out

You're skipping over the important part. Did they release a new song with this release?

>can barely pay their electricity bills
>no torrent download option

>>can barely pay their electricity bills
Been a while since that.

I don't know if you have read the list of new things, but they just updated their radeondrm(4) code, which means I can now run OpenBSD in my APU based HTPC. Yay for me.

Yay! Yay!
Still no support for vega (that's only half-proper as of Linux 4.15 iirc), but it's progress.

>torrents for cd images that are a few megs

what's the newest APU that it supports? Are the drivers good enough for emulators and desktop compositing with blur effects and shit?

>needing gpu drivers on and os where you will never use them

Attached: 4d41927a78df5015b02aba908da788cc47e43f8b_full.jpg (184x184, 12K)

whats up with the hats it wearing , dont get it .

>he doesn't know

user, I am not sure how to tell you this but...

Are you feeling it now, Jow Forums?

Attached: Screenshot_20181018_095541.png (747x950, 781K)

Reminder that OpenBSD is lacking the following things:
>A robust filesystem such as ZFS, btrfs, or HAMMER2
>Any kind of journaling FS
>SSD TRIM
>NFSv4
>Support for more than one core on various parts of the OS. The firewall, pf, is confirmed to be one of these parts, although there may be more.
>802.11ac networking
>Nvidia graphics from this decade
>AMD Vega graphics
>Certain Intel graphics, at least judging from comparing the manpage to the wikipedia article
>Broadcom wireless
>Bluetooth
>WINE
>LUKS/dm-crypt
>Linux compatibility layer
>Mounting ext filesystems
>free(1)
>lsblk(8)
>and probably more

Cool, we should continue supporting them so such things can be made in the future :^)

>>Linux compatibility layer
Pointless shit

If you want the rest of those things you can always contribute.

Omg exiciting I can't wait to never waste another second of my life on the garbage that is bsd. I hope all you shills die in a fire.

He is a troll, notice how a good portion of his list is Linux-only garbage that makes zero sense to port. OpenBSD supports full disk encryption, but of course they don't do it through a Linux module like this faggot wants to.

It's like complaining about why OpenBSD is "missing" Windows Powershell while ignoring that it offers multiple shell applications.

The rest of his list are things that the devs themselves either dropped support or said that they don't care about supporting because it is unsafe garbage like Bluetooth, WINE, Linux compt layer, etc.

>implying I don't play games on OpenBSD

Does dwarf fortress run?

I dunno, probably. I mostly play dhewm3 and openmw

meh, I use gnu.linux and I'm happy

Some people on forums claim they got it to run.

What’s stopping people from deving in openbsd

Sanity.

they don't even ship gcc, why would anyone do any serious development on it?

Imagine being this salty over an OS.

Attached: 1402841014840.jpg (387x397, 22K)

how's it feel to be delusional?

I wouldnt know, I dont use Linux

again with the paranoia, get help faggot

Ladies and gentlemen your average openbsd user.

Attached: DpyxXbsXUAANYkH.jpg_large.jpg (410x337, 29K)

Fuck off with this gay ass shit

t. CIA

I'll use OpenBSD when they relicense to a non-cuck license.

...

OpenBSD being on twitter tweeting shit like that is one of the most cringe things I've ever seen. They should stick to mailing lists instead of trying to appeal to the numale onions crowd.

Attached: cringe.gif (575x420, 507K)

That's certainly one way of thinking about it. People need to get their heads out of their asses first though before we can Make BSD Great Again (MBGA)
>shit like disk encryption outside of software raid setups, NFS, filesystems, and firewalls is /v/
BSDfags still in denial confirmed

i don't understand why people come to these threads and they just lie

So does it have a modern filesystem yet?

Attached: A58E454F-6E74-4233-A66B-9A5EA551EECF.jpg (750x1334, 320K)

ah yes, let me just switch my OS real quick to get a 10 years old compiler!

And before some retard comments on the version. The reason is because that's the last GPLv2 release. The GPLv3 is not considered a free license by the devs.

You are always free to get the latest version with your non-free license from ports.

Talking about retards

trips of truth

I count my blessings every day knowing I wasn't born retarded enough to reject perfectly good software just because I don't like its license.

Nope. Some people have mentioned the possibility of HAMMER2 getting ported, but I have no idea of the status on that.
checked and based

openBSD is an OS advocating for truly free open source software
If you don't like it, use non-free GPLv3 shit from ports

Hammer2 isnt even finished yet
Since you're not forced to use openBSD, that's for the best

You mean truly cucked? Truly botnet?

Attached: FuckBSD.png (895x429, 326K)

you call yourselves freedom fighter yet you're shoving your arbitrary definition of freedom down people's throat, how ironic.

>my software is free
>that's why only people I like may use it
Ah yes, true freedom
Are you by any chance US/EU based?

those restrictions are made to protect your freedom, if you don't like them then you don't like freedom

>just adhere to our definition of freedom, we're forcing it upon you for your own good
The GPL is not called a commie license for nothing, you know

Thanks for convincing me to jump on openBSD

This is your average GHANOO/Lunix user.

Attached: Screenshot_20181003_022647.png (1048x791, 188K)

So you think a society in which slavery is legal is freer than one in which it isn't? If the answer is no, you are actively being a hypocrite.

you mean like how the word cuck is synonymous with bsd?

Attached: 1524673011626.png (600x536, 253K)

see you tomorrow

Only forced by GPLtards
Last time I checked all openBSD core devs are pretty based
Idk, does the software you have the freedom not to use enslave you by being proprietary?

Attached: 1526680229218.jpg (612x556, 127K)

>g-guys look at us, we wrote o-openssh y'know
yeah no, you're all a bunch of cucks

Idk, is a society with legal slavery still bad if you yourself are not a slave?

Of course not

>we wrote openSSH
*we* didn't write anything, openBSD devs did
But don't forget these too
openbsd.org/innovations.html
Ofcourse it is. Because people are forced to do things. That's why we advocate for free and open source software. And I dont mind the GPL, as I dont mind whatever proprietary license Microsoft or Apple use. And you can use any license you want, you're free to choose. I'm just saying they're not free, and free licenses are better for everyone

Try saying that in public

Well you're certainly free to have that opinion, but I have a feeling most people would see that view as incredibly self-centered, and that society as incredibly oppressive.

Attached: wtfpl-strip.jpg (1200x1500, 297K)

BSD is worst. Who smokes a cigarette backwards?
LGPL based

After all of these years of looking at that comic I was so fixed on the comments that I never noticed the cigarette was backwards

Can i play GTA5 on openbsd?

See: >no WINE

>What's new
>Cntrl+F
>Polaris
0
>Ryzen
0

:(

>GCC 4.9
JESUS

It's the last GCC version under GPL2. That's the reason they switched to Clang as their default compiler.

Does it have TRIM yet? I will unironically give it a try if it doesn't fucking destroy my SSDs.

Fuck, you got me

Upgrade your SSDs to this decade, grandpa

Elaborate

>That's the reason they switched to Clang as their default compiler.

Clang being vastly superior and having sanitizer tools would also be something to do with it.

TRIM is only of relevance for 1St gen SSDs
There's a 99.99% chance your SSDs will break for whatever reason, and a 00.01% due to wear and tear through the lack of TRIM

Why this fucker always so smug?

serious question if anyone knows the answer - why don't they use clang instead?
"We actively intend for clang (and LLVM as a whole) to be used for commercial projects, not only as a stand-alone compiler but also as a library embedded inside a proprietary application. The BSD license is the simplest way to allow this."

same fag here. after reading further down the thread I see that they do use clang. why even bother bundling gcc and making it a 'highlight'?

Because he doesn't give a flying fuck!

Attached: 1525017227205.png (796x588, 96K)

It only switched over last year, they're probably keeping it around for legacy reasons seeing as the two compilers aren't 100% guaranteed to behave identically.

Good.

GCC's available but it's no longer in the base system.

I always figured that was the cherry

>restrictions are made to protect your freedom
Yeah, that's like fucking to protect virginity.

clang doesn't target as many archs yet