All 4 of my WD black i bought back in 2012 failed.
Aren't WDs supposed to be the better ones?
All 4 of my WD black i bought back in 2012 failed
Matthew Long
Other urls found in this thread:
backblaze.com
backblaze.com
twitter.com
Carson Jenkins
they started being shit somewhere around 2008.
Only hitachi was good (yes I know they got bought by WD), but maybe it changed recently.
Charles White
Hudson Flores
As it turns out, Seagate's HDDs were reliable all along and we fell for the WD shilling.
Ethan Sullivan
seagate was shit for the entire 90s and for most of the first decade of xxi century, that's why the opinion persisted for so long
Cooper Ward
No, in my experience the 1.5TB models and such were bad.
No. You are supposed to have redundancy and backups, you won't know if you made the better choice before it is too late
Angel Flores
seems like it. have been using seagate since forever until the whole 7200.11 series 100% failure rate then switched permanently to WD.
looking back, only the 7200.11 series failed and nothing else, while i had WD greens, blues, blacks all failed on me multiple times.
Noah Howard
Convert to the BBC wyboi
Jose Reyes
>No. You are supposed to have redundancy and backups
well today hdds are for backups, ssds are for actual disks in use.
Josiah Perry
all 4 of those are backups...