Looks good guys

Here you go buddy.

Attached: 1536933295046.png (1109x3646, 376K)

Looks like all the games are GPU limted desu

Attached: BENCHMARKS-PLACA-MADRE-AORUS-Z390-MASTER-5.jpg (1370x885, 324K)

>no 9th gen

Its tested with a single GTX 1080 non ti so yea

>implying 9th gen is anything new over 8th gen which implies 8th gen was anything new over 7th gen

Attached: BENCHMARKS-PLACA-MADRE-AORUS-Z390-MASTER-11.jpg (1370x885, 353K)

>posts a graph that shows the 9th gen intel annihilating AMD after talking shit about the 9th gen intel

>implying that optimizations don't happen, and that frequencies doesn't change anything

I wonder how he's going to respond.

Its the same exact arcitechture on the same exact manufacturing procress

Single core will be the same as the 7700k we all know this

So why does it destroy AMD so badly in this graph?

Damn, the 9th gen intel looks insane.

Maybe because its 60% more expensive?
8 FPS for 200 dollars more price?
Seems like a great bargain

Attached: BENCHMARKS-PLACA-MADRE-AORUS-Z390-MASTER-14.jpg (1370x885, 371K)

>GPU bottleneck

Can't but notice that if you actually sort it by what matters when you're doing anything that uses the CPU the 2700X scores 1778 which beats the much more expensive i7-8700k

looks like pretty worthless charts, most scores differ less than margin of error.

You talk too much shit.

The intel rapes the AMD in single core performance by something like 30%, so at equal number of cores, the intel will always win.

So? The i7-8700k is a 6 core, the 2700X is a 8 core.

The same applies to the i7-9700K it's 8C/8 and the cheaper Threadripper 1920X it competes against is a 12C/24T. There's no question which is going to finish faster rendering in blender, compiling or encoding or compressing or anything else demanding for that matter.

Single core only matters if you're a manchild playing poorly written games that can't into multicore. And perhaps other things on the Wintoddler side, I do see people here go on about single-core like it matters so perhaps it does on that platform. Linux has had proper scheduling and compilers since forever, I very rarely see anything use 100% of just one core.

You say that, but most amdfags are vidya gayman manbabbys who do not into any of the things you say ryzen is good at.

Battlefield graph starts at 120, metro starts at 0. Is this a thing that's going to happen so the latest triple a looks better on Intel?

How?

Attached: 1538664799932.png (2224x1369, 1.1M)

>Battlefield graph starts at 120
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Attached: 1536612142306.png (504x400, 91K)