9900k

AHAHAHAHAHAA OH NO NO NO

Attached: imgonline-com-ua-Piconpic-cmnGEovUTPCxRwPu.jpg (1327x1222, 319K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0juO5KuwBX4
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

delid dis thread now OP, it is pure anti semitic

Attached: stf,small,600x600-c,0,0,1000,1000.u1.jpg (1000x1000, 153K)

It's the fx9370 all over again

95 Watt TDP

why did they call a NH-D15 closed loop cooling?

Mistakes were made I guess

>(((((95w)))))))

>fail

Which AMD CPU performs as well as this?

None, if you really need that much performance you'll have to pay double and deal with the ridiculous amount of heat/power consumption

You are using it wrong.

Get a workstation class cpu if you need encode video, most games wont stress the CPU at 100% in the same way a stress does.

So I would arguee that 100% load is no real scenario for the intended market.

Kek

The trade off for performance is price, and heat/performance. What if I overclocked a 2700x would it get to where the 9900k is in performance?

So what you're saying is that gamers should instead buy a CPU 80% as powerful, but much cheaper

I think AMD makes some good options for that

Attached: 1522101742359.png (604x516, 88K)

For those unaware Asus multicore might be enabled without you knowing it.

You might enable it by accident when enabling XMP for your memory.

It basically forces all cores to run at the turbo
clock.

youtube.com/watch?v=0juO5KuwBX4

Attached: Untitled.jpg (1819x1085, 240K)

>higher is better

This has been known about for years and all reviewers state whether they're using it or not. Nice attempt though, Shlomo.

Now imagine next year when Apple puts these chips in their iMacs/MBPs

Are you saying that a CPU being tested at 100% load might be running at 100% speed?

I'd sure hope so, otherwise it would be throttled!

does K stand for kettle?

>and all reviewers state whether they're using it or not

You expect hardware reviewers to know what they are doing?

No, you are retarded,

If all cores/threads are heavily loaded on a 4790K the correct clock speed should be 4.0Ghz, with Asus Multicore Enhancment it is running at 4.4Ghz.

Kike’d

Attached: Untitled.jpg (603x407, 62K)

So my custom loop with a 480 and 120 rad will only keep that fucker at 80C?
Damn son.
That's why those chips are soldered.
Paste would literally make a 9900k explode

So you're saying it can't handle it's own turbo speed at low, and throttles.

With Asus multicore enhanchment enabled you are running the CPU out of spec.

I guess a heat pipe is kinda a closed loop in a weird way

OH NO NO NO NO NO NO!

Attached: screen-shot-2012-10-25-at-5.21.34pm[1].jpg (456x246, 29K)

More like 9590

Could have named it i9 9590K