/pcbg/ - PC Building General

>Create a parts list
pcpartpicker.com/
>Learn how to build a PC
Search youtube for a guide for your socket

Want help?
>State the budget & CURRENCY for your build
>List your uses; eg Gaming, Video Editing, VM Work
>For monitors, include purpose and graphics card pairing.
>Don't use Speccy. Use HWinfo, SIV, etc.
>For Win7 in Ryzen, refer to pastebin.com/TUZvnmy1

CPU
>i3 8100 - Bare minimum gaming
>R5 2400G/R5 2600/x- Consider IF on sale
>i5 8400 - Good gaming & multithreaded work use CPUs
>i7 8700k - Currently best value high-endgaming at any resolution
>i7 9900k and 9700k - Surely the best for gaming at any resolution/mixed usage on a non-HEDT platform
>Threadripper/Used Xeon - HEDT

RAM
>8GB - Enough for most gaming use
>16GB - Standard for heavy use
>32GB - If you have to ask, you don't need this
>CPUs benefit from fast RAM; 2933MHz+ is ideal

Graphics cards
>RTX 2000 cards are top of the line GPU atm but wait untill the price comes down a little
>Avoid cheap MODELS ie MSI Armor (Mk2 is ok), Gigabyte G1/Wf, ASUS dual, and others which have small heatsinks and low quality fans
>Avoid Vega they are poor values and inferior to their Pascal counterpart in every way
1080p
>1060 6GB standard 1080p 60fps+ options
>1050 3Gb or RX560 4Gb for lower settings and/or older games
>GTX 1070Ti/1080 if seeking higher FPS /w a high hz monitor
1440p
>GTX 1070Ti/1080
>GTX 1080Ti if seeking higher FPS /w a high hz monitor
4K
>Upscale from 1620-1800p. Gtx 1080ti/2080. Maybe 2080Ti, but awful value.


Storage
>StoreMi is a sure way to brick your system and lose your data
>Consider getting a larger SSD (better GB/$) instead of small SSD & large HDD
>2TB HDDs are barely more $ than 1TB
>M.2 is a form factor, NOT a performance standard
>NVMe are not for gaming; See "More"

Display
>Consider 75hz minimum; 60hz are mostly old models.
>Always consider G-Sync with nVidia cards
>PLAN YOUR BUILD AROUND YOUR MONITOR IF GAMING

Attached: untitled-22.png (711x668, 25K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/r5Doo-zgyQs
lanoc.org/review/cpus/7870-intel-i9-9900k?showall=&start=5
anandtech.com/show/13400/intel-9th-gen-core-i9-9900k-i7-9700k-i5-9600k-review/21
uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/83Tfkd
uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/DBG4GG
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>setup mb279qr144
>it goes black for a few seconds whenever i turn my ac off
Should I call an electrician or did I just get a faulty monitor?

>mainly WoW gaming
>$1700 budget

What do you recommend?

Put that list in the dumpster, famalam.
>inb4 muh low 1080p benchmarks

Attached: Power-1.png (1327x1222, 62K)

9900K looks like a fucking train wreck.

>stock temp of 80-90C with Noctua D15
>100 C temp at 5.0 Ghz
>no boot at 5.1

Not to mention it fucking throttles.

Based 8400

>Buys a $580 CPU to play at 1080p

Attached: ACO.png (1327x1446, 74K)

>everything ultra/extreme
>1080p
>RX 580 + Ryzen 2600
100+ FPS.

>1080p doesn't matter
Kek

At that budget it doesn't.

>GPU bottleneck

They used a 2080 ti

The 8400 is a surprisingly good CPU. One of the best Intel has come out with in years.

>Avoid cheap MODELS ie MSI Armor (Mk2 is ok), Gigabyte G1/Wf, ASUS dual, and others which have small heatsinks and low quality fans
So which brand/model should I choose for a GTX 1080?

>Oh it's that shill thread again
K Y S
Y
S

Attached: 1530481515569.png (800x612, 234K)

Whatever is the cheapest.

I've noticed that the fans on my gtx 1070 SC2 are not spinning at equal RPM. (Pic related)
They're designed to work independently. The GPU has a lot of temperature sensors and they spin depending on what temperature a certain sensor has. The card is designed to work that way and it's been very cool and relatively silent, even at 90 to 100% load for hours on end. Should I still setup a custom fan curve for both fans, similar to a more traditional GPU cooling solution? If I choose not to, will the default (separate) fan curve reduce the lifespan of the fan that's spinning most? I've had the card for a few days and I'm very pleased with how it performs.

Attached: Capture.png (78x306, 29K)

8700k is the best value gaming cpu, and you can upgrade to an 9900k in the future for more performance
AMD shills can't use the muh upgrade path argument anymore

Daily reminder to still DELID and *new* LAP the die on new 9th gen Incel cpus

youtu.be/r5Doo-zgyQs

Attached: incel solder.jpg (1280x1440, 155K)

i'm leaning towards a 9700k build if the 9900k power usage is as bad as it seems

i'm confused though, there seems to be a lot of inconsistency in reviews. for instance, lanoc is reporting much lower power consumption and temp values than other sites:
lanoc.org/review/cpus/7870-intel-i9-9900k?showall=&start=5

Kek he think his shitty z370 board could power that montrosity that is the 9900k.

>Wants to buy the 9900K
>That price
>Those thermals
Do you think der8auer will release a direct die cooling kit?

Attached: 9900KStock1.jpg (946x629, 74K)

They really should consult him for their CPUs if they want to rescue anything

the fuck you're on about
only reason intel didn't change the socket yet again this time is because these "new" cpu are the same shit, only with more cores and somehow even worse thermals
they literally didn't make enough changes this time around, and it never really took much for them to make a new socket, so that's pretty impressive in a pretty bad way

Stop kvetching the thermals are good!

Attached: PCxRwPu.jpg (1327x1222, 319K)

Anyone?

reposting cuz apparently we're switching threads at 270 posts now

Attached: z390 rev4.png (1491x1653, 156K)

>dembt8er
Keep my business afloat guyz!
This still needs delid guyz!
you might get 100 Mhz from it!

I've seen the 9900k reviews, I want to build a 1440p rig

It looks like the 9900k runs hot even on high-end Noctuas so I'll just go with the 2700X

Can the 2700X max out the 2070 or 2080 at 1440p? I don't mind downgrading to 144hz 1080p if its slower

Anyone?

The same thing could be said about the 2xxx Ryzen

>b-but am4 support untill 2020
Yeah they never said it's for for 7nm CPU. Enjoy your dozen of ryzen refresh.

Which one of these has the bigger priority?
1. A CPU upgrade ~ 200€
2. A Monitor upgrade. ~ 300€
I can sell the monitor if I end up not needing it in a few years time. The CPU will likely be out of date or underperform in a few years time.

Attached: 61gLpm14UjL._SL1400_.jpg (1400x1400, 96K)

I'm going to buy it when it's cheaper, otherwise I can wait until the 3700x is released if it BTFOs Intel. Temps also vary from different reviewers and Tech Spot has some strange benchmarks

Attached: temperatures.png (500x370, 26K)

Torture vs more realistic load. Its normal to OC your CPU and having it crash on a torture loop. The temp is still not OK tho.

Depends on what is shittier and what you're upgrading to innit

That's old and the VRM discussion group on overclock.net didn't make any new ones as of now
He works with Caseking, what business and Intel fucked up, not his fault for pointing out.
You may loose up to 10 frames but yeah should work out. You could also get the 1080Ti if you don't care about ray tracing and the other things Nvidia has.

Man what the hell happened to the prices of components... Looking to build a new PC next month and the cheapest 8700k in my country costs €500 and gtx 1080ti costs €850... Back when I built my last pc that €1350 build a full godlike PC

Intel always has stock shortages whenever there is a new release.

Nvidia just jewed everyone by adding $100-$200 more for their GPUs for the same performance plus raytracing that doesn't exist yet.

The 9th gen does have hardware fixes against the hardware vulnerabilities and Microsoft will release patches which will make the performance impact only 1 digit heavy.
Intel is just fucked because of that Poolack Krzanich. They used the 14nm process for so long now and soldered their CPUs only because the 9900K is so hot. Otherwise they still would be using TIM I bet.

>You may loose up to 10 frames but yeah should work out
Why? Where?

2700x + 2080 @1440p or 2700x + 2070 @1080p?

2080 Ti is good but yeah the rest is utter shit. I wish AMD wouldn't supply consoles and killing PC gaming like Nvidia and Intel do with prices.

Anyone know how to get lower ram use in Windows 10? No matter what I do it gets stuck at best 2GB at idle.
I tried using black vipers windows 10 guide but it didn't really do it.

Lol as expected 9700k is better than 9900k. I was saying that for weeks.

Attached: i9-9900k Review - The Non-OCers KING That Commands a PREMIUM_20181019_170947.838.jpg (3840x2160, 662K)

Is more core counter productive at certain point? The 2700x also has subpar gaming performance compared to the 8600k.

How does that look at 1440p when you reach 5.1 or 5.2ghz on a 9700k or 9600k vs 2700X?

You will lose a bit of frames at 1440p and more at 1080p. Depending on the game but from what I saw its 10%~ on 1440p and can be around 20% in 1080p. 4k you won't lose any since it's GPU bound.

8700k went up 200eur + easy lately Intel is literally a joke right now and all components have gone up for ever it feels like

Look up some benchmarks. 1440p still is somewhat relying on the CPU and I would get the 2080. 1440 will get more demanding.

OH NO NO NO

Attached: i9-9900k Review - The Non-OCers KING That Commands a PREMIUM_20181019_171139.966.jpg (3840x2160, 717K)

Are you going for 1440p@144Hz? 1440p usually GPU bottlenecks and the Ryzen single-thread performance doesn't really matter that much.

The 10 FPS someone else mentioned usually happens at 1080p over 120 FPS or so.

Attached: 1538419587419.png (500x970, 49K)

>averages

me here

Please show actual framerates instead of some relative performance garbage. Relative performance is not actually interesting when trying to decide whether or not you can hit a target framerate at some resolution.

So 2700x + 2070 @1080p then?

Its not more cores. Its because incel's hyperthreading is shit and makes single core performance worse. I bet for gaming if you disable hyperthreading on 9900k you will gain fps, but then just buy 9700k.

>2070
>1080p
I swear people in those threads have lower iq than room temperature

ACK ACK ACK ACK

Attached: i9-9900k Review - The Non-OCers KING That Commands a PREMIUM_20181019_171938.526.jpg (3840x2160, 671K)

Why would you? Go for 1440p with that card. 2700X is a pretty good CPU.

But I looked at most benchmarks and the 2070 barely reaches 60fps on most AAA titles

It seems a little overkill for 1080p. For 1440p its just right but you won't get 144Hz. more like 60fps-100fps

a 2080 will give you 144hz in 1440p at most titles.

Do you really need to play every game on ultra?

Lmao what? My vega 56 plays 1440p. I seriously doubt 2070 would struggle, unless you mean with RTX(tm) on.

Thanks
Yes

Why the fuck would you play with rtx on? The game starts looking like a shiny turd.

I just want more frames

I meant playing everything on ultra/high-ultra

Then the 2070 would be perfectly fine for 1440p 60-100 fps depends on the games. Some goywork has no visual improvement worth the performance hit.

Fucking hell, so the 9900k runs hot as fuck right?
Money was not an issue for me, but I don't want to buy something that runs super hot that is only a small upgrade over the 8th gen i7. Should I just buy an 8086k or 8700k and maybe get it delidded?
AMD to me doesn't seem like a good choice looking to the future, 4k performance is equalized right now because of gpu bottlenecks, but that will change in a couple years.

get 9700k superior to both 8700k and 9900k.

The 8086k is a memed 8700k. Delid is also a meme because even the 8700k runs hot its still perfectly fine everyday use. Put that money on a good cooler instead.

as a current 2500k/r9 290x owner, this is the direction i'm leaning, waiting for some dedicated benchmarks, and whether air cooling is feasible.

Does it have the same thermal issues though as the 9900k?

>incel's hyperthreading is shit and makes single core performance worse
lolwut. That hasn't been true since Ivy Bridge, and even then it was like 2% at most.

not clear, the only stat's i've seen on it come from the anandtech review, pic related

anandtech.com/show/13400/intel-9th-gen-core-i9-9900k-i7-9700k-i5-9600k-review/21

Attached: file.png (977x638, 54K)

there are a very few benchmarks which give a slight edge to the 9700k

Attached: file.png (694x407, 72K)

why not just use the stock cooler, is it really that bad?

is it worth selling a 6600k/rx580 rig and then buying a 2200g? i only play csgo and if i need a gpu i'd get a rx 570.

None of Intel's k-skus come with stock cooler because Intel's stock coolers ARE that bad.

The stock cooler yeah. But budget like the 212 Evo should be fine stock clock.

The solder on any CPU is inherently not ideal. Even Ryzen CPUs can drop temps with a delid, which is because the solder is a thicker material than conductonaut can be.

Attached: file.png (650x337, 64K)

It's true even for 8700k check cs:go benchmarks for 8700k with hyperthreading and without.
>inb4 something something source engine is shit
That's exactly the reason why it's perfect for single core benchmarks.

I thought it was just overclocking the 9900k that was leading to thermal issues. Because a stock 9900k should be faster and "better" than an 8th gen chip and worth it if you don't care about money.
Anyone know what stock thermals are like or have I misunderstood the stuff I've read and seen? Is it just disappointment with how the solder isn't getting better results than paste?

I love gee slash gee

exdeeeeee

Helping a friend build a pc, his old one died recently but some parts are still working.
Is this build good for the budget?

uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/83Tfkd
>budget
300£, up to 330 if needed
>List your uses
gaming, currently playing maplestory2, photo editing
>Other stuff
Monitor is 720p, will upgrade in the future along with the GPU
Mini tower because he's traveling and wanted something small.

>uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/83Tfkd
I wouldnt get A320 mobo no matter what.

Get a B450 board. Otherwise looks pretty good.

Just looked around, all the big youtube reviewers don't or barely touch on thermals. GamersNexus only had thermal data under blender load, the 9900k has about equivalent thermal performance to the 8086k. both stock and overclocked. Nothing too "bad" just extremely disappointing its solder vs paste. .

You are wrong. GN temps are Delta T over Ambient, so you need to add 20-22 degrees C to their measured temperatures to get the actual chip temp.

>looking to the future
To the future, the 7nm/10nm jump will be what matters, not 14nm+++ refreshes. If you think that you'll buy new powerful 7nm GPU and will then be happy to use it with 14nm++ hot shit CPU rather than upgrading that to 7/10nm as well, then go ahead.

How the fuck can AMD even compete with Intel anymore?

i9 absolutely destroys Ryzen

With yields. Then can afford to sell their CPUs at half the price with no loss and still have decent margins, Intel can not.

can any of you anons suggest/link a good one that still falls within budget?

I know, but the data still shows 8086k and 9900k being similar thermally. ambient +32.7 vs ambient + 36.9.

>Ryzen 2700X (AUD)
$481
>USD
$304

>Google USD to AUD
>$304 -> $427

481/427 = 12%

>Australian GST is 10%

2% margin of difference, left.

>9900K (USD)
$529
>AUD
$859

>USD -> AUD conversion
>expected price after GST
$742 + 10% = $817

859/817 = 5% difference.

WEW

Why are austrailians so fucking retarded? Its always them complaining about their prices when comparing to USD.

uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/DBG4GG
What about this?

That depends, the 9900k literally reaches 85C with a NH-D15 under Blender for example.

because its a lot of money. cost of living is way more expensive here too.

That seems really bad to the point it would be widely reported given that's not even full load, do 8th gen intel chips with paste get that hot too? I'm on a 2700k so I don't know how hot the paste chips get outside of what I read.