Why arent there more females in tech?

Yo this looks comfy af. Where do I buy?

They drop comp sci after getting surrounded by thirsty incels in college

drive.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf

Women made up Computer Science just about the same as other top fields until around 1985 where it started rapidly falling.
This happened around the same time personal computers were being marketed as toys for boys, and it didn't stop when a whole culture was created of computers being seen as a thing for boys.
The real answer just isn't as autistic as Jow Forums hoped it would be unfortunately.

Attached: Untitled.png (776x448, 34K)

>Believing social studies theory
You drank the Kool-aid hard.

No, it's when secretaries who sidestepped into the field as punch card monkeys retired.

>why arent there more females in tech?
There's heaps. They're called TRAPS

>ignoring govervment statistics
gamers UNITE

There are plenty of females in tech, specially now that companies are hiring women because muh social justice. In fact they have a lot easier time getting a job in the industry than men do.
I haven't seen many traps aside from those in Jow Forums. Regular faggots are common though, specially in front end webdev.
>trusting the government

>Strawmanning this hard
I said that there is no correlation between the two, has nothing to do with the statistics.

what do you think caused that dip then fellow gamer?

Attached: 1534862070451.jpg (655x527, 36K)

The rise in women's studies. You're steering minds from the fields you're trying to infiltrate.

Because Apple computers are so expensive

> muh boy toy marketing
No, it's the other way around.
Computer users had been marketed as basement dwelling nerds by the media, and women being status obsessed hypergamous whores, dropped it en mass. That's when it started becoming a "boy" career.

It's actually because basement dwelling nerds are the ones that happen to be interested in tech in the first place. If tech was about sucking cock of a hot dude or discussing the prettiest haircuts, this field would full of women.

If you need the media to tell you want to do with your life, then the problem is with you and not the media.

This basically. The women who are complaining about lack of diversity in tech are ironically the ones not interested in tech, but only in getting attention.

Women have objectively lower IQs than men

Why not? I'd be happy if this autistic sausage fest of a company I work at got some cute girls to talk to

Because sexist AI and statistics that keep the women down.
theguardian.com/technology/2018/oct/10/amazon-hiring-ai-gender-bias-recruiting-engine

Not when they're put on your team and you have to do the work for two people because her dumb fem brain can only think of Chads cock

I can't wait for the day when companies relying on based and redpilled racist AIs start to dominate markets because white male supremacy is fact

>evolved to bear childs and take care about them.
>Work 100% on feelings.
I'm not saying they can't code. But evolution so has it that males have much more free time to think about coding.

You aren't born with an interest in computer science, it is shaped heavily by external factors such as the media. Where do you think your interest in technology came from?

Attached: 1535610271359.jpg (306x306, 16K)

Big companies will keep gimping them until others don't and they face extinction.

The rise of real programming rather than high labor low intellect grunt work in the form of punch cards

> woman child meme
that is why.

Attached: 1539801838031.png (1562x504, 732K)

Men weren't particularly interested in the field intil personal computers. The "marketed for boys" as reason is retarded but not surprising coming from the same people pushing blank state theory.

I don't agree.
If you're the least bit curious about how things work, then you're interested in computer science.
Not because it solves everything. But rather how it doesn't.

>Where do you think your interest in technology came from?

I was born before the age of the internet. My interest came from books that I've read in the library. Just like most science/tech books, there's no images of men/women in or on the book covers indicating what gender the books are appropriate for.

Lack of interest
also thirsty autists everywhere like

My dweeb coworkers are autisming all the time about Magic the Gathering and muh Zelda, that would be literally the same situation but with girls instead of fat faggots.

I'll take 1000 thots over 1 sperg who can't into teamwork.

Female programmers are usually extremely good or extremely bad.

they are called called women, incel

Why would girls want to be part of something they make fun of virgins for being? They wouldn't be making fun of it if they liked it.

Different interest between man and women.
Same reason why there are more women in the health sector than men.

The best part will be they'll have total deniability. There'll be zero way to prove muh sexism when its all in the hidden layers

Except women wilingfully opted out of it.
Tells you all you need to know, really.
The few female I know that can code say it's because they're basically disabled as women.

Not only girls, other guys make fun of "nerds" for being into tech. It might be different now, but being nerdy back then wasn't considered a compliment. Cars, sports, drugs, ghetto culture, and guns and was considered cool. The male-focused marketing of tech is just hooey made up by disgruntled feminists. They only care about something only after it becomes popular.

picture related.

Attached: _g_-_i_want_to_fsck_that_kode._definitely_got_a_killer_-_Technology_-_4chan_-_2018-07-25_23.55.56.pn (1009x691, 1000K)

protip. being a nerd is still not cool.
Actually, it will never be, unless programmer is a job that yields you 10K+ a month.

I know plumbers that make north of 5000 a month.
They don't even have to beg for work, just because there is always work.
I should have learned plumbary.

There are programmers that make more than doctors and lawyers. Being cool has nothing to do with how much money you make. Things are only cool if they're understandable. Doctors treat people of medical problems. Lawyers defend people in court. But what a programmer does is incomprehensible to most people.

But I know about programming.
I've worked there.
You're most likely gonna get minimum salary throughout.
Also, they're very keen on shitty HR policies.
I opted out, just because it was a toxic environment.
Now, I may be doing a shit job, but at least, people are true to themselves.
Maybe I'll be a plumber instead.

Computing takes brains. Women are stupid sluts who do nothing but bitch about how wrong other people are when they didn't even do much, and then they go to teach children who they can punish and boss around to fuel their own superiority complex. Computing doesn't give them a reason to feel better than everyone else, so they avoid it.

You're wrong.
Women have plenty of brains to spend on CS.
It's just that it doesn't makes sense for them to do so.

>mfw the leftists passed laws to force fed us "social studies" in public school and yet we still rejected their brainlet tier theories

Reality: companies start relying on AIs designed to pick the cheapest pajeet for the job.

Toxic people exist everywhere. Social media gave these people more power and influence.

Regardless of how many women are (or could be) in the field, there's still a problem of lazy, incompetent workers. You have smooth talkers who manage to weasel their way into a job, but end up doing little work and having other people pick up the slack while being paid the same or better.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH

horrifying that one of the most powerful companies in the world thinks like this.
fuck.

Coincidentally the same time the problems that needed to be solved to advance the field started getting quiet difficult.

because women got small brains, but big butts made for breeding.

those are some nice shoes tho

this
programmers and nerds are actually dumb one dimensional people

Because the minute you try to explain that it is a viable opportunity given the effort all the incels come out of the fucking woodwork screaming about how they lost a job due to some women, ignoring the reality they have 0 social skills and never get past the initial phone screening.

why arent there more males in gender studies?

When it stopped being primary-school maths and punch cards, and actually became difficult, women abandoned it en masse.

Even then women contributions to the field were small

Because they are too stupid.

women are intelligent, they just aren't very interested in tech.

>women are intelligent
good one

women have pretty decent IQs on average.

Boys and girls start out with the same proficiency in math and science, but testosterone tends to delay linguistic development. Boys end up focusing more on the subjects that they are relatively better at and get better at those faster than the girls. Without prodding to keep a similar focus, girls are more likely to drift away from STEM as the gap grows and instead focus on humanities where they can get a relative advantage a lot easier.

then y no women in stem?

Attached: btfo.png (1001x1100, 1.08M)

due to their temperament, not their intelligence.

Women as a whole are not intelligent.
Women can be intelligent, just like men; none of them are intelligent by default.

i'm speaking in generalities. statistically, they tend to be. and statistically, they tend to not be interested in tech.

You said it yourself.
Women are average. They are mediocre, nothing less but also nothing more. Women aren't stupid, but they also aren't smart.

There's a reason girls struggle more when it comes to logic-based subjects. Back when you faggots were all young, you might remember that at school all the girls were teacher's pets, they studied and prepared for everything, color coded their notes, etc etc.

But the second they had to face a problem they were not prepared for, they were at loss. They were dumbfounded that this was a situation they could not prepare for.

Women might have a decent average IQ, but men are both smarter and dumber than they are. Men are a much wider plethora, with the smartest and dumbest being men and not women. Women are the epitome of mediocricy. Women are conformists.

This is why there are no female revolutionaries, this is why there are no female leaders. This is why females prefer to follow and not to lead. And this is exactly why men have historically been the dominant gender. However, now that women dominate politically and socially, men are at loss, for they, the natural leaders are now being forced to listen to the followers.

Women live on what's provided to them.Their lives are built around expectation.

It is biologically impossible for them to expect the unexpected.

Attached: 58d.gif (500x375, 2.78M)

Why aren't there more men in preschools?

Does it amaze anyone else how quick humans are to force things into their own categories? and how broadly generic vague and idiotic those can be?

We as humans are at the very end or wave of evolution, we are the most recent development. But we have been shaped by nature each step of the way. Nature creates everything over eons of fucking time in a non-random way to ensure the survival of the species, so in this way even the species itself develops qualities of its own, how fast the young develop, how long the adults live, how the males mate with females, when that mating season is, what diet they eat in the environment they want to thrive...etc etc.

We did none of the "work" ourselves in determining our individual characteristics. That was genetics over millions of years. So then in the past 50 years or so there's been this concept called "tech" that the humans created, and SUDDENLY ALL OF NATURE is fucking shoved into the box of "you will be equal in this respect". Humans literally take a human made concept (tech) and its associated talents, capabilities, mental features one would need to be good, and superimposes the nature made categories (male and female) onto them completely evenly and "without bias"....its such fucking bullshit.

Because men are pedos.

gender roles

Women are pedos too. They're just not protested.

Literally every girl I know.

The sexual thirstness difference between sexes is real. I won't deny female pedos exist, but there are not nearly as many as male pedos. Most women don't even have weird philias, while men do.

I have thoroughly enjoyed that gif.

because males are better at technology related things.

they're ugly

There are a growing trend of male teachers in pre-schools and men has increased as the demand for nurses has grown over the last several weeks. The explanation is technology is killing jobs in other fields and men are forced choose "traditional female jobs"

>Where do you think your interest in technology came from?
Because it's fairly profitable?
Because it's a highly logical field which is easier to understand?
Because it removes the limitations set upon us?
Because it's interesting to see how other people solved problems?
But no, your reasoning makes much more sense. It was the external media that made me interested!

They are busy doing more important things then tinkering with toys. They are busy raising tiny humans bro.

Maybe in the older days lmao.

Busy raising tiny chihuahuas, then.

There are, they just have finished their transition. lul

fuck, I like the idea but I would fall asleep and then wake up with back pains

they're not as autistic on average. The tail end of the distribution of males who are severe autists is much higher. but I guess saying a group is not socially retarded is an insult now 'a days?

Woman here. I have been working as a software engineer for ten years now. I have worked on game engines, machine learning, data science, pretty much anything fun.

There’s a push because it honestly is a lot harder grtting into tech as a woman. There’s all these weird hoops like I have to be “one of the guys” to fit in and any sign of femininity is taken as a weakness. For example, most women who have worked in nonfrontend programming I’ve seen over the years avoid makeup or use minimal. They also speek like an octave deeper around teammates than around me. Most women just weren’t encouraged like a lot of men are to get into tech when they do show an interest. I know like some men I had to fight tooth and nail to get where I am today—there’s a disparity here with how accessible tech is made to men vs women. Heck, even on IRC most of the women I know on freenode and the like go to great lengths to conceal the fact that they’re women because people will automatically treat them with less respect.

I have a trans woman friend who confirmed what she experienced as a male in tech and what she experiences passing as a woman in tech. Its very interesting how insecure or jusf plain shitty men get about women doing intellectual things, almost as if it threatens some of them.

All in all I’ve worked with mostly pleasant people but its stupid to pretend this reality doesnt exist and that women have less opportunity to succeed in tech than men om average.

Like my male friend who I just taught to code just got a high paying job which took me years ro get to that point when i was on my own.

Yes there are womens reachout orgs that help women get into tech, but the reason they exist is because texh is currently an extremely masculine space. I know that sounds absurd but if uve ever worked with a mostly female team vs a mostly male team ull notice differences. I wish tech to be more accessible and pleasant for all.

Trust me, they're not worth it. At all. You'll miss the autists when they're gone, they're kind of clueless but basically harmless.

women have the same experience in construction work
it's not because we're "insecure about women doing intellectual things"
it's because we want our own space