>Needs a Z390 to work properly or the VRM's explode >Needs a £100+ cooler >$540+ CPU Only a few percent faster than a $390 8700K >Runs like a furnace >Requires a high end PSU to run >Barely overclocks and will brn your house down if you try >Will easily get beaten by upcoming Threadripper 2920X for a similar price in productivity workloads >'BUT ONLY GAMES MATTER!' >Barely even does that better than the 8700K >Requires a high end GPU like a RTX 2080 Ti to even show that performance difference... >and only at 1080P (who the fuck would buy a 9900K for 1080P anyhow?) >Overall cost to performance ludicrous when you can buy a 2700X or even a 8700K far cheaper. >'WHAT ARE YOU POOR?' >No. Just not stupid or a whale that does not care about money anyhow. >Availability is shit even if I wanted to buy it >Zen 2 only a few months away AMD giggling intensifies
i am new to pc building and have no clue what you just said, how can i go about learning whatever the fuck you just said? where do i begin this path?
Jaxson Bell
I wonder if the pajeet that wanted to use the 9900k on a $30 used mobo burned down his house yet
Jack Barnes
It's ok OP. even Incel shills don't have that kind of money. It's a 7820X is what it is, and nobody bought that. Pricepoint is $350 max, and intel will only sell you quad cores at this price.
Cameron Sanchez
Intel bad. twice pricier. I think that's about it.
>You can almost build two 2700X systems for the price of ONE 9900k Why would anyone want to though?
Julian King
>Zen 2 only a few months away you guys been saying this for a long time. just wait for poolaris... wait for poodozer... wait for poodriver... wait for poofury... wait for poozen.. poozen plus.... poozen 2.... POO POO PEE PEE POO POO
Thomas Cox
Why the fuck would I pay literally twice the price for a processor that offers 10% better performance?