Would you now consider a Vega graphic card?

Would you now consider a Vega graphic card?

Attached: 20181021_09_08_54.jpg (360x360, 19K)

Other urls found in this thread:

eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2018-10-17-radeon-rx-vega-56-benchmarks-7001
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

For the right price sure.

For 250-300? yes.
Or atleast a refresh where they use less than 250W.

I undervolted my gtx1080 so it consumes 136W at full load, I wonder what level of performance Vega would deliver with the same power restrictions. Probably 1060-esque, lol.

at the low end, is nvidia or amd less power hungry?

No
AMD graphics cards can't compete with Nvidia in games
Other applications? Sure

What applications?

I'm not a manchild gaymer so why not.

At msrp, which you can find 56 at and 64 below, they are better value than the 2070 and are comparable to the 1080.

Like the other anons says, at the right price. I only ever saw two boxes of 56 at my local store ever since it was launched, miners eat 'em up.

Mining buttcoin

if its cheap then sure im still hoping that AMD is gonna have cards that can rival xx70s from nvidia for cheaper in next 3 years

Now, when 1080 is at 430 EUR and Vega 56 is at 380 - maybe. AFAIK OCed 56 beats 1080 a bit, however I just don't see games which will justify 56 over 480. And I don't bruteforce hashes very often.

They gotta be priced competitively, and scarce HBM2 memory doesn't help.

Ram cartel really fucked AMD on that front didn't they.

nvidia is generally less power hungry.
I live in a hot area so I had to buy a 1050ti (75W) instead of an rx 570 (120W). I kinda regret that since nvidia is trash in GNU/Linux. I should have gone with the rx 560 which performs slightly worse.

they do compete incredibly well in the mid range which is 95% of the market. RX 570/580 and Vega 56 are kings of price/perf.

for $400 tops, since it's better than a 1080 but less gay
Talking about the vega 64 though

You can't undervolt pascal cards, with undervolting it simply disables cuda cores. Your 1080 performs at 1070 level now.

yes if it's really cheap, vega 56 for $200, why not?
undervolt it and get mad temps.
otherwise i'll wait for 7nm. which is a big deal.

no fuck no

>perform worse than 1070
>consumes more power than a 1080ti
>60c on idle
>meme coins expensive tier

>comparing RX 570 to GTX 1050ti
RX570 is like 50% faster than 1050ti so more power is needed. RX 560 is about the same power consumption to that though.

wow it comes with anti-sag!!!
no more sagging!

I don't want my house to burn down.

I have a Saphyre Nitro+ Vega 64

I love having it.

stop embarrassing yourself, retard

Is this a rhetorical question? Even AMD knows it's fucking garbage

Attached: 0EbcANZ.jpg (900x960, 106K)

>have rx 560 4gb and gtx 1060 3gb
>only game i played in a long time is ffxii remaster on pc
>rx560 can't get to 60fps unless low setting 100% gpu load
>1060 on max except msaa down to 4x 75% gpu load
>watched digital foundry analysis
>rx 580 to get 60fps with AO at half resolution
>1050ti will do it at the same settings
square enix fucked my shit up.

I ended up buying a 1080ti in my pursuit for high refresh 1440p gaming. Although I would've happily bought a Vega 64 if one popped up for the right price, just to make use of the freesync function on cheaper monitors. Hoping G-sync won't really be necessary for a 1080ti anyway.

Thread seriously makes me wonder, a Vega 64 is at the same price than a gtx 1080.
Which would you take, and why?

t. brainlet

No, because I need CUDA cores for a specific application

gay anime visual novels?

Some algorithm used to work with pictures

So, gay anime visual novels. Interesting

eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2018-10-17-radeon-rx-vega-56-benchmarks-7001

OH NO NO NO

I have one of these (vega64 nitro+). No regrets.
It should last me (as in perform well) a few generations of cards.

Attached: 1524031580384.png (1920x1080, 852K)

>Vega 56 and 64 outperform 1070/1080 especially when DX12 and async shading start to kick in.

> They consume about the same power as 1080Ti with some undervolting they only eat little more power than 1080 at stock

> 60C idle = you are hopelessly retarded (HURP DERP I LIKE TO CRAM SHIT IN MY TINY CASE WITH POOR VENTILATION AND WONDER WHY IDLE TEMPERATURES ARE SO HIGH!)

> Cryptocurrency GPU mining is dead right now

I don't regret getting a Vega 64.

Only if you have a good Freesync monitor on hand.

It is still unclear if Turing has proper VESA VRR support or not.

LMAO mine barely reaches 60 maxed out, the fans rarely even kick on

lmao fuck no