>he isn't studying A.I./Machine Learning/Deep-learning
>his job will be among the first to be taken by robottos
>even if he escapes to the """"arts"""" bots will do it better than him too
Face it Jow Forums, there is only one job you can be safe from being taken by automation. And by the time it's also taken, we will either be dead or living like gods
A.I. chads assemble
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
arxiv-sanity.com
twitter.com
This field is an overblown fad that will die off once the economy crashes. A.I. can only do very specific tasks when fed billions of data samples, it's not even close to biological intelligence in the ability of general problem solving and abstract thinking, which is what it would require to replace more than a fraction of current occupations, let alone programming jobs. Nu-male redditors like you will say general A.I. is right around the corner and that Moore's law is evidence of this. But faster computation cycles has nothing to do with emulating the insane complexity of the brain, and Moore's law is estimated to end within a couple decades anyway.
Moore's law is already ending, has it not? All the major chip producers are forced to prioritize lower power consumption over increasing performance
Either now or very soon. You can only fit so many transistors on a chip before it becomes nearly atomic size. And energy dissipation may be a problem already.
>he's "studying" AI/ML/DL
>his "job" will be to feed the robots data
>he still have the better/worse dichotomy for arts
>This field is an overblown fad that will die off once the economy crashes.
The field isn't anywhere near overblown, and as A.I. permeates more of the economy it will only expand and demand more professionals. Nice fear mongering though.
>A.I. can only do very specific tasks when fed billions of data samples
And only by doing that is capable of displacing hundreds of millions of jobs already
>it's not even close to biological intelligence in the ability of general problem solving and abstract thinking
And the first plane wasn't anywhere near from extraterrestrial travel. Nevertheless the burgers got to the moon 60 years after it's invention
>Nu-male redditors like you will say general A.I. is right around the corner and that Moore's law is evidence of this.
Since you are so insecure you need to resort to name calling and putting words in my mouth i can only assume you lift burgers for a living and are shitting your pants at the robots that can already do it faster, cheaper, and better then you.
>But faster computation cycles has nothing to do with emulating the insane complexity of the brain, and Moore's law is estimated to end within a couple decades anyway.
Again, retard, Moore's law isn't necessary for A.I. to advance, the current rate is already enough to predict the emergence of A.G.I. by a few decades according to most experts in the field, and it's a matter of enhancing algorithms and data far more than mere hardware by now
>he isn't studying AI/ML/DL
>he won't have a job
I've been on Jow Forums since it was a slow board. Back when /prog/ was a thing there were people who said AI will always be stuck in meme-tier capabilities
Equating a fancy application of gradient descent to AI should be a punishable offense.
>at work
>guy wants to do supervised learning but only has 50 training examples
Also any tips to "level up" my ML skills?
Looked at questionnaire for research group and questions were hard.
Any developer job is automation-proof. By the time AI can actually write code we will already be at the singularity.
Also deep learning is not nearly enough to qualify as AI. It's a fancy brute-force regression tool, nothing more. Just another tool in the toolbox.