>Its just Linux. GNU/Linux sounds retarded, and no one in the real world will take you or your OS seriously if you call it that.
>Package count does not matter.
>"Software Minimalism" is nothing short of thinly veiled masochism.
>Vim and Emacs are a complete waste of time, and you all make way too much fuss over your text editors. Its the artist, not the brush that counts.
>Systemd is not botnet. Prove me and wrong and audit the code. Oh wait, you aren't a programmer and don't know how an init works. You likely can't even tell me why you don't like it without copy-pasting someone elses opinion.
>Arch and Gentoo are a waste of time, and have no place in the professional world or home computer.
>Desktop/Screenfetch threads are what give Windows/Mac users the impression that our OS is a useless toy.
>Only Incels use tiling window managers. You also waste so much time ricing and customizing that you forgot the point was to make you more productive.
Linux: Post Your Unpopular Opinions
Other urls found in this thread:
infosecurity-magazine.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
This is not how you greenpost newfag.
200 iq argument
I'm quoting myself, faggot.
You can love Linux, but still be cool with using Windows/Mac/BSD.
dnfdragora is a worse gui package manager than synaptic
OMG, KYS retard.
>no one in the real world will take you or your OS seriously if you call it that.
objectively wrong stopped reading there
Btrfs is actually really cool
>>Its just Linux. GNU/Linux sounds retarded, and no one in the real world will take you or your OS seriously if you call it that.
OS/2 also sounds retarded. As does "Windows".
>>Package count does not matter.
Somewhat. More packages = higher chance of a good one.
>>"Software Minimalism" is nothing short of thinly veiled masochism.
No. Security, optimization, ease of use, etc.
>>Vim and Emacs are a complete waste of time, and you all make way too much fuss over your text editors. Its the artist, not the brush that counts.
I'm a professional writer. There is no substitute for Emacs if you're working with large (50k+ word) documents.
>>Systemd is not botnet. Prove me and wrong and audit the code. Oh wait, you aren't a programmer and don't know how an init works. You likely can't even tell me why you don't like it without copy-pasting someone elses opinion.
I've no idea about systemd. Even if it IS botnet, it's still a superior choice to Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, or any other data mining websites.
>>Arch and Gentoo are a waste of time, and have no place in the professional world or home computer.
I'd tend to agree; I've found Debian Testing to be a good middle ground.
>>Desktop/Screenfetch threads are what give Windows/Mac users the impression that our OS is a useless toy.
I switch between KDE, i3 and openbox depending on my mood. Show me how I can easily do that on Windows, or Mac, and we can have us a conversation.
>>Only Incels use tiling window managers. You also waste so much time ricing and customizing that you forgot the point was to make you more productive.
Kinda. I use i3 to help out with Emacs buffer tiling.
My workflow usually is two or three buffers (and their respective indirect buffers with outlines), an orgmode buffer for notes, TODO's, etc, and a few buffers where I've saved snippets of information that is relevant to the thing I'm writing.
But, I'm a writer; this wouldn't apply to 99% of Jow Forums.