Winamp

Winamp 5.8 has been released as freeware and 6.x is coming next year. What's your shitty reason not to use it?

tldr;
>not using winamp 5.8

Attached: jonnet jne.jpg.png (335x245, 15K)

Other urls found in this thread:

codeforge.com/article/20535
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>winamp

Attached: 1538984733422.jpg (480x451, 54K)

Attached: 1200px-Foobar2000_logo_2014.png (1200x1583, 107K)

>foss

Attached: 1539104096989.png (499x558, 99K)

does it work with wine ? winamp 2.9 best player

I'm not a boomer

Winamp 5.8 is botnet. Last good version is 2.9x.

Spotify

>winamp
>current year

AIMP is superior.

Foobar seems to be fine and it's open source. Why bother changing?

i don't know user, why bother changing from winamp

where foobar's source code is available?

Does the leaked version have botnet or malware ?
Can i trust a llama?

Attached: dosouthamericansbelievellamas.png (729x217, 20K)

Because its crap. Any player, such as foobar, aimp or musicbee have been better than winamp in every single regard for more than a decade. There is not a single reason to use deprecated, bloated shit like winamp other than nostalgia.

>this software is playing my music better than this other software
>this software is displaying my videos better than this other software
When did Jow Forums devolve into ... this?

Freetards ruins everything

Old winamp plays music just fine and new winamp is guaranteed to be botnet spyware that adds absolutely nothing of merit

It really whips the llama's ass.

>dont give a shit about winamp for 10 years
>suddenly new version
>must download
>must tell other people
am i cool now?

Attached: soy.png (644x800, 15K)

fpbp
/thread

It's just like /v/ a few years ago expect replace console wars/elitism with distro wars/elitism.

it's not open source.

Reverted to 5.6 because modern skin doesn't remember window position.
And that triggers me to no end.

>What's your shitty reason not to use it?
I couldn't find a changelog so i couldn't be arsed to upgrade.

>people actually use memebar
Its shit, looks like shit, behaves like shit

ive used winamp 5.6 for ther past decade or whatever, what will 5.8 give me?

the devs obssession with llamas ass is really concerning.

It really whips the llamas ass

Nothing wrong with Winamp Modern

Attached: official_anathema_design_theme_by_psytropic.jpg (355x329, 112K)

it really sucks the llamas dick

>sevendust
>192 kbps

Found it on google, I'm not at home
I laughed

>where foobar's source code is available?

codeforge.com/article/20535

Attached: Capture+_2018-10-22-12-15-24.png (720x1199, 241K)

I tried it and it doesn't support opus out of the box so uninstalled right away.

>implied f2k sourc
>10-15 year old codebase
yeaah

is this a botnet

I have never not used winamp, I'm old and change is scary.

Where's the source code? ;)

fucking redddit is all over the place

Attached: snapshot_18.02_[2016.07.29_07.44.42].png (1920x1080, 3.14M)

This will be the last good winamp. 5.8 fixes some bugs adds support for some stuff, they stripped the payware shit. It's freeware.

You can checkout full log in their forums

6 will be a phone app..... God have mercy.

>2018
>still using winamp
Zoomers can fuck off with their spotify/pandora/iheartradio streamshit, there's nothing like 5+TB of FLAC to satisfy my auditory autism any day of the week.

>not using VLC
>any year

shiggydiggy

>using a video player for music
Do you also use a meat cleaver to skin fruit?

That is in no way an apt comparison.

VLC uses the same codecs as any music player and is just as processor intensive. It has many of the same playlist features and support as well.+

Since the dawn of time.

>a few years ago
I take it you haven't been there in a while?

this x100

>all the classic skins still work
based

VLC music library management is shit

That's because support for classic skins is hardcoded into the executable. Open it with Resource Hacker and you'll see the images for the defaul skin embedded in there.

>too retarded to get into foobar
Lmao

>a player as ugly as wmp8
wew

>caring about aesthetics on a music player
Functionality-wise, it's the best there is. Learn to use it, you low IQ faggot

>not retard
>use vlc
choose only one

Attached: apu kuola.png (669x514, 25K)

I'd completely forgotten about winamp. I haven't seen that used in years, but it was all my dad used when I was a little kid. I have lots of pleasant memories sitting on his lap and listening to classic rock. That was all before I turned into a teenage piece of shit. Does it still have that skin/theme with the green lettering?

Yes

>Winamp 5.8 has been released as freeware and 6.x is coming next year. What's your shitty reason not to use it?
>tldr;
>>not using winamp 5.8
I don't support animal abuse. Too many llama's asses have been whipped over the last few decades.

Yes.

Name another player that can play SACD ISO rips

why would you need to do that

Name one

read nigga read

"lol u dont need that" is not an argument

i don't do that

Why should I update? Any new earth shattering features? They should just open the source at this point desu.

was going to agree but why should I use 5.8? I've been using 5.666 and it's the same thing, but I'm worried the newer one is botnet.

I'd still be using the version of winamp bundled with netscape if not for it couldn't play all my files and display japanese characters, what difference does 5.8 make?

Attached: MusicBee.png (256x256, 22K)

Week ago a lot of well-know journalist sites are linking to "new winamp leak" bullshit when was another generic malware.

Not him but JRiver.

i never stopped using winamp but i have no reason to update since it's still working just fine

>Winamp
oh fuck me I forgot about winamp and how good it was with all of its skins. Sadly I changed to vlc years ago and forgot how comfy Winamp was.

>winamp is so windows 98.
>I'm having flashbacks of playing shitty napster mp3s

fuck all y'all bitch ass llamas