Enlighten me

Enlighten me

Will the 9900K be able to run alongside RAM speeds higher then 2666MHz, lets say 4000MHz?

Attached: https_%2F%2Fblogs-images.forbes.com%2Fjasonevangelho%2Ffiles%2F2018%2F10%2Fcore-i9-9900K.jpg (1280x868, 95K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/NGHiRrQ2AAo
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Depends on how good your water chiller is. I recommend at least a 1 1/2 one like in pic related.

Attached: 1539965136296.png (1000x746, 235K)

>9900K
Either go to the Extreme platform of Intel or buy a Ryzen CPU. The consumer Intels are not worth these days.

Attached: System.png (1631x931, 181K)

Pointless since it's bottlenecked by dogshit ihs solder and a Thicc ass die
Even running liquid metal and delapping it barely gets you below 85c at 5hgz on extreme water cooling
Just wait for Zen 2 and ddr5
Ddr4 is dogshit

I'm concidering:
ASUS ROG Maximus IX Hero
Corsair Vengeance PRO 16GB 4000MHz
9900K

CPU cooled by
NZXT Kraken X42


But I'm not sure if the CPU can handle the 4kMHz

Since when does the spec sheet ever matter to RAM speeds?
2666mhz is just the officially supported RAM speed you can go higher but anything higher is considered an overclock

>dogshit ihs solder
its an improvement over TIM

I literally wasn't joking lad.

Attached: amd_unboxed.png (1261x709, 484K)

It's actually side step ironically
youtu.be/NGHiRrQ2AAo
Don't bother
Zen 2 7nm and ddr5 is dropping 2020 or earlier double the memory speed.
Just get a 2700x or used 8700k

so THIS is the future of intel.....

>failed

Attached: 1433447699367.png (301x300, 57K)

Attached: 1539106434232434554300533.png (910x547, 211K)

Intel did solder because it did allow them to get a little bit more out of the CPU.
and the temperatures are not as bad as everyone thinks

put your trip back on beawesome

Lol sure it did
200 watts at 4.9ghz or less
Post temps and cooler or fuck off

>t. mong

Attached: jesus_christ.png (2001x1051, 189K)

Unused power is wasted power.

Run the chip within specifications the temps are fine its even in the video in this post Lots of motherboards decide to just say hell with power limits and just let the chip run wild.
Everyone also seems to have this expectation of 5ghz on all cores and get mad when it runs hot

Shit damage control it won't even bench at 5.1ghz without dying
Cant wait to see how shit the longevity of this chip is my bet they won't last until next year and mobo dying all around

Attached: file_8.png (1384x725, 138K)

You do realize this will cause massive frame stuttering, right? The whole point of an unlocked chip is to run at the max turbo frequency or higher 24/7. If the i9-9900K can't even run at the max turbo frequency 24/7 then why get it at all?

Attached: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS9YL0wvNzc0OTIxL29yaWdpbmFsL0Zhci1DcnktUHJpbWFsLUZyYW1lVGltZW9C (711x445, 90K)

That's missing a temp bar.

Literally posted here and here
The 2700x is nowhere near as bad and comes with a decent cooler and it's cheaper more plentiful and doesn't have bullshit issues like this shit ihs solder crap temp tall die insanity

based

>Shit damage control it won't even bench at 5.1ghz without dying
What the hell did you expect?
Did someone tell you it would do 5.1ghz?
You can't be mad at intel went something doesn't to your preconceived expectations which are outside what the processor says it can do

Why hasn't anybody turned these chips into literal space heaters? It could probably chew through 300W if you OC a little

Attached: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS9DLzkvODA1MjU3L29yaWdpbmFsL2ltYWdlMDA3LnBuZw==(1).jpg (755x561, 88K)

>unlocked chip
>you can't OC it tho
nice

If you clock all the cores to 5GHz that is an technically an overclock outside of what the spec sheet says

Attached: image.png (797x108, 6K)

No, it isn't. The chip has been binned to AT MINIMUM be able to hit 5GHz albeit at a very high 1.5v voltage. All 2700X chips have also been binned to at minimum hit 4.3GHz albeit at a very high 1.5v voltage.

Ruh-roh this means there's a huge chance most i9-9900K won't even be able to do 5GHz at 1.35v and you'll need dual water chillers to maintain 5GHz.

Attached: 1529447991874.gif (190x190, 1.98M)

Yes a good motherboard will easily run 4000MHz ram

>just wait 2 years for ddr5 bro ;)

Look at these pathetic AMD pajeets. They're seething because they can't afford Intel. It's a housefire alright, but it still beats your poorfag 2700X.

Doesnt even get the font right and the AMDtards still fall for it.

>Ruh-roh this means there's a huge chance most i9-9900K won't even be able to do 5GHz at 1.35v and you'll need dual water chillers to maintain 5GHz.
You'll get 5ghz on atleast 2 cores on any 9900k anything after that is not guaranteed but for some reason people have this expectation of 8 cores at 5ghz but at the same time get mad when it consumes alot of power at the same time

Right but by how much? 2700X gets close enough to the 8700K for it to not matter anymore. Yeah you could blow $500 more on intel trash OR you could blow it on a better GPU.

Attached: Comb10102018092249.jpg (641x2895, 365K)

No, you'll get 5GHz on all core but on the maximum stock voltage. The 2-core lock is set in stock settings because of temps and power consumption.

>ASUS ROG Maximus IX Hero
you gonna use a z270 mobo with a 9900k?

in the rare event that you arent trolling (which ofc you are)
you gonna burn your house down

with the amount of money you wanna throw just buy a 2700x a top notch x470 mobo some air cooler and get a good gpu

Holy shit, I just noticed that too.

Attached: vrm_death.jpg (2560x1440, 251K)

>No, you'll get 5GHz on all core but on the maximum stock voltage
Where does it say that?

>intard seething

Be sure to buy the chiller, too :)

Because that's how the chips are binned, they're tested at max stock voltage at a certain frequency. If all cores pass at said voltage and frequency at certain OEM tests they get shipped as a certain chip.

t. I work with OEMs.

>1.5v voltage
>1.5voltage voltage

>Reviewers leaving MCE on again

As ahows if you actually run these chips within spec they are nowhere near as fast as people think because they can't maintain TDP/power draw limits when you load the cores so clocks drop really fucking low. The 9900K is the first consumer chip in a low time to exhibit this (see also: why server chips from both AMD and Intel are clocked so low to stop nuclear explosions).

Attached: inteli9hardboiledeggmaker.jpg (3840x2160, 796K)

>bUt bY hOw MuCh
>mUh PeRf/WaTt/$$
It beats it, end of story.

>Yeah you could blow $500 more on intel trash OR you could blow it on a better GPU.
OR you could stop being so poor you have to price balance your build and buy an inferior CPU to afford a better GPU.

Attached: HardAbandonedChinesecrocodilelizard-size_restricted.gif (435x250, 3.25M)

>Haven't been to G in forever, because building computers isn't fun because they all run so well now
>start using a laptop only so I can be a normal person who does a workstuff
>Suddenly get the urge to look at sweet gpu and battlestation pics
>mfw processors suck again and need my talents to get them to run correctly

Attached: Deverstated.jpg (1154x800, 138K)

Was that OEM Intel then?

Even if you had the money why would you blow $500 more for 5% better FPS?

Why do you want more and more speed? To shitpost in Jow Forums, browse the internet in general, watch videos in YouTube and watch tv series/movies?

To play gaymes at 9001 FPS at 480p on a 120/144Hz monitor of course. Gotta stat competitive haha.

Attached: 1492016705583.png (622x336, 14K)

That's GPU bottlenecked. I personally play at 240p and the lowest settings on my i9-9900K OC'd to 5.1 GHz and OC'd 2080ti.

>240p with 5.1 GHz i9-9900K & OC'd 2080ti
>not gpu bottlenecked
pick one

Attached: Tastes_like_freedom_it_s_bbq__2e10332f48097a22c83c858bb291d09e.png (323x326, 155K)

For real though OP, IF the VRMs don't violently detonate your CPU will burst into a fire. Just get an 8700K or 2700X like a normal human bring.