There is no reason to use Windows in the current aeon. (((video games))) are not an excuse...

>GNU/Linux
That's a funny way of spelling OpenBSD

Attached: Harry.gif (227x343, 23K)

(1/3)
OpenBSD is a meme
>Filesystem
SSD TRIM is vital to supporting SSDs, as without it, they degrade quickly due to unnecessary reads and writes. Sadly, OpenBSD has decided not to support this.
OpenBSD also does not offer a modern filesystem option. You simply get the very old BSD "Fast File System" or FFS.
Why is this important? Because when most people think of a secure system, they think of being resistant to evil hackers breaking into it. But that's only one part of security. InfoSec can be generally split up into three components: Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.
In this triad, availability seems to be the one that's lacking here. Who cares how hack-resistant your system is if the data you're protecting is corrupted?
That's not even getting into the volume management stuff that's missing, and the snapshots, and the everything.
"b-b-but MUH BACKUPS!!"
What are you even saying? That bitrot all of a sudden doesn't exist anymore? That backups are the one and only thing you should do and should not be supplemented by a more stable filesystem?
You do realize that if the filesystem is not secure and does not protect against bitrot and corruption, your precious backups are going to be fucked, because you'll be backing up corrupted data. Who even knows how far you'll have to roll back in order to get to a clean state?
"ZFS is one big thing! Very not-Unix! Just combine tools, bro"
OpenBSD doesn't have logical volume management either. Even if it did, FFS doesn't have the checksumming, bitrot protection, etc. Even if it did, OpenBSD softraid doesn't support as many RAID levels as other operating systems' solutions. It's just a worse deal all around.

Attached: puf800X689.gif (800x689, 69K)

(2/3)
>Security
"Only two remote holes in the default install!!!!!!!"
Yay!
I hope you realize that this literally only applies to a base system install with absolutely no packages added. In other words, not exactly representative or meaningful towards... anything really.
OpenBSD also does not have NFSv4 support even 18 years after its standardization. This is an issue security-wise because version 4 is the only one to offer authentication with Kerberos plus encryption with the krb5p option.
A common retort to this argument is that the NFSv4 protocol is "bloated", and that's why OpenBSD doesn't support it. Going off this, the OpenBSD project seems to think that authentication and encryption are bloat. Take a moment to consider that. It's certainly a very strange stance indeed, for such a "security-focused" operating system.
Let's of course not forget that OpenBSD lacks a Mandatory Access Control solution such as SELinux, AppArmor, or TrustedBSD, which provide benefits that are relevant to companies, organizations, and governments looking to better secure their systems and classified data.

Attached: no-sign-hi.png (600x600, 20K)

Attached: NOpenBSD.png (1000x1000, 168K)

forgot the third part, fug
(3/3)
>Sustainability
A few years ago, OpenBSD was actually in danger of shutting down because they couldn't keep the fucking lights on. How could anyone see this as a system they could rely on, when it could be in danger of ending at any time?
"but it's open source! Someone could just fork it"
Oh yeah because surely they'll be able to maintain the entire OS
Actually now that I think about it, that really depends on the person/organization that does it. And they might actually have some sense and be able to fix some of the issues listed here.
It's official. OpenBSD would be better off if it shut down and was restarted.
>C Standards-compliance
"B-But OpenBSD is written in strictly standards-compliant C! Clearly that's better than muh GNU virus!"
So you're not allowed to create extensions to the standard? You should only implement the standard and nothing more? Keep in mind that this is nothing like EEE, as the GNU C extensions are Free Software, with freely available source code, as opposed to proprietary shite. People should be allowed to innovate and improve things.
If you're gonna be anal about standards-compliance, then why let people make their own implementations anyway? Why not have the standards organizations make one C implementation and force everyone to use it?
>Miscellaneous
OpenBSD's pf has inferior performance, as it only utilizes one core of one processor. GNU/Linux's netfilter firewall does not have this problem. Neither does pfsense.
OpenBSD does not support any 802.11 Wi-Fi standard newer than 'n'. It also lacks Bluetooth.
WINE doesn't exist on OpenBSD.

Nobody is using windows because of muh video games. People are using it because that's what they grew up with and they can't be bothered to learn anything new.

>muh storage filesystem
Use raid or softraid. HDDs have some protection built-in to combat bitrot.
>2 holes is nothing to brag about
There is a lot of shit in the default install. As an example, how many systems include a capable web server out of the box? There is a lot of surface area actually. Don't pretend otherwise.
>Openbsd doesn't have NFSv4
There may be very good reasons they won't even consider support. Also, a lack of a security protocol is not inherently a security issue. You look at the system as it is without the protocol as if the protocol doesn't exist and ask if the system is secure to assess that question without bias. Encryption is not some magic fairy dust that just makes things secure. Sometimes adding a new protocol that sounds to secure creates more security problems than it solves due to increased attack vectors and surface area.
This is directly from Theo
>NFSv4 is not on our roadmap. It is a ridiculous bloated protocolwhich they keep adding crap to. In about a decade the people whoactually start auditing it are going to see all the mistakes that ithides.
>SELinux, AppArmor
Look at jails, pledge, unveil, and priv sep
OpenSSH is very secure but doesn't use those bloated methods.

>A few years ago, OpenBSD was actually in danger of shutting down
Far from true now. Donations are on the rise. Corporate sponsorships as well. Don't take my word for it. Look yourself:
openbsdfoundation.org/activities.html
Funny thing is that freebsd is getting fewer donations now than openbsd.
>Rant about c standards compliance being bad
That's just personal taste. What actually matters is how high quality the openbsd codebase is and that they continually audit every piece of their source tree (everything in default install).
>It also lacks Bluetooth.
They took it out for security reasons.
>openbsd innovations openbsd.org/innovations.html

BTW I have you to thank why I use openbsd now. Thanks.

Attached: theo_de_based.jpg (200x198, 3K)

3ds Max is only supported on Windows.

>shit multidisplay support in every de
>overheating laptops with half of battery time
>still no good dlna music player
Thanks, i'll stick with windows.

Her face looks like she's made of wax. Zoomers can't into makeup to save their lifes.

>hardware audio / video equipment etc
>software, any (good) photo editing software, or any audio/video editing software, most game engines, etc
>Just works (spending countless hours debugging shit to just find out you can't do it on Linux is not fun.)
>Polish (part of it just works but Linux does not have this. EG: can't even change mouse scroll speed on Linux)
>No driver issues

These are my big ones

I actually like when I turn on the computer after an update and nothing is broken.

>GNU/Linux is the best OS for everyone.
If that were true, you wouldn't have to argue for it, people would already be using it.

explain why no linux distro can handle 4k monitors
ill wait

>giant lock
Let me know when they implement real SMP, faggot

>falling for the 4k meme

Actually getting work done.

>w-why would you even want that!
current state of linux

I am useless piece of shit who will an hero one day.
Games keeps me entertained till then. Thank you very much.

I don't want to write WINE support for every program I use, and what's the point of a VM I'm always in when I'll get way better battery life running Windows natively?

I don't use linux, dumbass.

Too little software.

then why are you posting you fucking retard

Wine probably already has support.

Because 4k is a meme.

only if you're poor

>doing what you've always wanted to do since childhood
>"cucked"

Attached: jennifer-lawrence-ok.gif (245x285, 915K)

No, it's a meme in any context.

Isn't this that dumbass of a "celebrity" which got phished, doesn't know how the internet works, and was about to sue the internet for her whorish pics getting "leaked"?

based

Why are the textures so grainy and blurry. Why can't they be simple and detailed?
I don't play many new games but I've seen this in a few videos of other games too.

d-does Mint count?

also i-is that a man?

>he fell for chromatic aberration meme

Don't games usually provide the option to turn that off in settings?

where are the install wizards?