MM/DD/YYYY

> MM/DD/YYYY

Attached: TSTBaQ7.jpg (1462x2046, 98K)

>A/M/D

D/M/Y is autism.

Is there any reason to ever deviate from the ISO date standard? YYYY-MM-AA

Do you also use mm:ss:hh on your clock?

>AM/PM

This

>YYYY-MM-AA
Fastest changing variable should be first. Makes it easier to read.

>Fastest changing variable should be first. Makes it easier to read.
But harder to sort and search.

>12-hour clock

>still basing dates on archaic mythical figures and roman emperors and gods
Stardates when?

Very opinabile

Do you set you clock SS:MM:HH?

This.
>well on the 1st day of any given month, here is what I did, then on the second day of any given month...

date -u +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S

>Fastest changing variable should be first.
according to who

#rekt

HH:MM:SS, hour is the most important. Same with date DD.MM.YYYY, the day is the most important part. You don't put the year first which only changes once a year and it's not that important.

DD/MM/YYYY
HH:MM:SS

beat it. protip: you can't

>YY/MM/DD/HH/MM/SS

Attached: 1540059059433.png (360x690, 202K)

Our number system is big-endian, ffs.

YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS

Your move.

>having a space

YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS

YY.MM.DD or MMM-YY

Debate me

>no time zone

YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ

Get on my level.

I'm an americlap, and even I hate that shit. I get the logic, in that it's left to right starting with the smallest number range to the largest, but to me it just makes more sense to arrange left to right smallest amount chronologically to largest. Or better yet, reverse it so it's YYYY--DD-MM since clocks are HH-MM-SS

i want to nakadashi akari

Surely bait

>poo
>loo

Attached: loo wid a view.jpg (1023x1183, 217K)

That's stupid.

Should always be YYYY.MM.DD-HH:MM:SS [TZ].

Drop values from the start and end of it based on supporting context.

How is that b8, m8?

This is exactly how it ought to be. Arrange from largest to smallest chronological value.

YYYY/MM/DD is the only sane alternative.

DD/YYYY/M

>any reason to ever deviate from the ISO date standard?
if it's in some casual text in my local language then I'll happily use DD/MM/YYYY. I'll use iso's YYYY/MM/DD if it's in English as everyone seems to understand what's what when the date comes first. Type 05-02-2019 and half the world will think it's one date and half the world will think it's another..

DD/MM/YYYY
HH:MM:SS

ITT las creaturas

Attached: 1518608423848.jpg (1024x1559, 177K)

Year, day, month. Because of hour, minute, second.

What kind of fucking logic is that you fucking moron. If that wasn't fucking bait you need to fucking top yourself because you're a fucking piece of drift wood, cunt

Typo. Meant YYYY-MM-DD HH-MM-SS

Only if you're a turbonerd. Otherwise it's just idiotic.

Good Slavbro.

>naidne elttil nigriv eht
>the chad big endian

Double numeric even if it's from 1 to 9 (hence - if it's 5-th, then it's 05, not 5)/Full literal name of the Month (NOT numbers, but letters)/YYYY.

Attached: 1539725443625.gif (500x341, 428K)

That's still retarded.

It's written the way it's said
>It's the 25th of October, 2018
> It's the DD of the MM, YYYY
>DD/MM/YYYY

Who the fuck talks like that.

People say "It's October 25th". No one says what year it is either, fyi, because we're not waking from comas.

>not using UTC on all timestamps so that they all sort properly when put in a list with each other

>tfw you will never be that bike seat

People who use proper fucking English talk like that.

And of course nobody says the year but if they did it'd be in that order.

>at UK uni
>got locked out of my student account on the first day because I kept putting my DoB temp password in mm/dd/yyyy
>also couldn't find the backslash and octothorpe on the keyboard for a solid minute

Attached: 1539260519533.jpg (1300x924, 988K)

>Pardon me, my fine fellow, could I trouble you for the time, wot wot?

I do, say, chap, it is "18 minutes past 3". I know I used three extra syllables there instead of saying "3:18", but it's proper Queen's English!

>Quite right!

Jolly good!

>18 minutes to 3 is the same as 3:18
Is this why you have to talk in as few syllables as possible?