Up to 7.8x faster than 16GB

What did they mean by that?

Attached: 2018-10-31 22_30_38-Mac mini - Apple - Firefox Nightly.jpg (1702x1322, 188K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ark.intel.com/products/134905/Intel-Core-i7-8700B-Processor-12M-Cache-up-to-4-60-GHz-
ark.intel.com/products/134892/Intel-Core-i5-8500B-Processor-9M-Cache-up-to-4-10-GHz-
ark.intel.com/products/149160/Intel-Core-i3-8100H-Processor-6M-Cache-3-00-GHz-
ark.intel.com/products/codename/97787/Coffee-Lake#@mobile
ark.intel.com/products/129939/Intel-Core-i5-8500-Processor-9M-Cache-up-to-4-10-GHz-
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

How about you read the reference that '3' is pointing to.

What would I do that?

>16GB cubed
what did they mean by that?

Testing conducted by Apple in October 2018 using preproduction 3.2GHz 6-core Intel Core i7-based Mac mini systems with 64GB of RAM and 2TB SSD, and shipping 3.0GHz dual-core Intel Core i7-based Mac mini systems with 16GB of RAM and 1TB SSD. Adobe Photoshop 19.1.6 tested using a 10GB file and rotate, unsharp mask, auto color, and scale functions. Performance tests are conducted using specific computer systems and reflect the approximate performance of Mac mini.

Its still redacted in a retarded way.
BTW, these Mac Mini finally have Desktop SKU CPU instead of laptop ones, according to Macrumors and my own Ark readings.

Dual core vs. Hexa core
fucking lol

>tested using a 10GB file

Why not use a 30 GB file and get a 100x speed difference?

Just climb in and geek out

Attached: 1539365858307.jpg (1024x1004, 60K)

No, they're still mobile SKUs and BGA soldered

ark.intel.com/products/134905/Intel-Core-i7-8700B-Processor-12M-Cache-up-to-4-60-GHz-

ark.intel.com/products/134892/Intel-Core-i5-8500B-Processor-9M-Cache-up-to-4-10-GHz-

ark.intel.com/products/149160/Intel-Core-i3-8100H-Processor-6M-Cache-3-00-GHz-

Lame. The only good thing is 10gbe in that form factor really. That and the cpu are the only almost reasonable cost upgrades. Ram and ssd are 2x more than what they should be.

You can buy your own RAM much cheaper because this uses SO-DIMM

When it comes to storage everyone is screwed, soldered and Apple's outrageous pricing for higher tier of storage

>2666mhz
>current year

Are you sure those are the SKUs in the Mac Mini?
I'm reading conflictin information.

>the absolute state of Jow Forums

Official specs only go to 2666mhz and you don't overclock on production machines.

looks like moot can finally upgrade our servers, r-right guys?

Attached: 1532933576016.gif (400x400, 784K)

wew pagefile vs memory

who?

get back to class, underage new fag

Look at the damn CPU package, it's not a socketed CPU

It's a soldered BGA CPU

Attached: Mini.png (989x796, 451K)

>implying that Apple can't buy a bga version from intel
Granted, you are probably right.

>being this new
wew

ark.intel.com/products/codename/97787/Coffee-Lake#@mobile

The only CPUs that have the same clockspeeds mentioned on Apple's page is 8700B, 8500B and 8100H

>tfw Apöl didn't use Ryzns

Attached: 1540022995936.png (297x331, 115K)

Under artificial situations like a custom made benchmark where exactly 64gb of memory is required, it'll operate up to 7.8x the speed of 16gb of memory that's forced to page to a slow ass HDD.

what an absolute letdown, prob the lightning ports from jewtel

No, in fact there's other CPU's in the desktop section that also match Apple description, like
ark.intel.com/products/129939/Intel-Core-i5-8500-Processor-9M-Cache-up-to-4-10-GHz-
It could make sense that Apple tried to redesign the airflow system for the Mac mini if they try to put a desktop part on it.
But again, you probably are right and the mac mini will have a six core laptop processor instead of a desktop one.

Apple should adopt OCUlink (and make a new mess in the process)

That's an exponent you fucking retard