What is your Stallman Freedom Index, Jow Forums?

>Calibre - semifree -Libre alternatives - Calibre
hmmm

Did you really just run an unknown script without checking its content?

Freetards at their finest

Shit
...yeah

How do I run this on windows 10?

Attached: donny.jpg (485x422, 37K)

>calibre
>libre alternative: calibre

>licenses
>libre alternative: licenses

Attached: 1418670697394.jpg (636x574, 36K)

> assuming I use arch

Holy shit, it's fucking worthless.

by getting python
pretty sure you can

>clone
--single-branch

>not using arch

Attached: 1505123038460s.jpg (250x166, 4K)

>ITT: btw i use arch :^)

Attached: 2018-10-31-scrot-or8.png (1680x650, 33K)

> cdrtools
>hurdur loicence
> recommends
>cdrkit
might as well not use the cd

|Name|Status|Libre Alternatives|Description|
|---|---|---|---|
|blender|uses-nonfree|blender|supports nonfree cuda|
|cdrtools|semifree|cdrkit|Apple's license binding with no clarification (apple_driver utility is nonfree)|
|faac|nonfree||[FIXME:description] is a GPL'ed package, but has non free code that can't be distributed under the GPL|
|gst-plugins-bad|uses-nonfree|gst-plugins-bad|depends on nonfree package faac|
|intel-ucode|nonfree||no modification, use restrictions|
|licenses|uses-nonfree|licenses|Remove non-free CC -NC and -ND licenses (also add WTFPL)|
|linux|semifree|linux-libre
fsf
linux_linux-backports-modules.2A_linux-ubuntu-modules|nonfree blobs and firmwares|
|linux-api-headers|semifree|linux-libre-api-headers|has source containing and recommending nonfree software|
|linux-firmware|semifree|linux-libre-firmware
fsf
linux-firmware|nonfree blobs and firmwares|
|linux-headers|semifree|linux-libre-headers
fsf
linux_linux-backports-modules.2A_linux-ubuntu-modules|blobbed source|
|mc|uses-nonfree|mc|recommends nonfree unace, unrar and unarj optional installation|
|openexr|semifree|openexr|includes embedded nonfree fonts in the documentation|
|p7zip|semifree|p7zip|contains nonfree unrar|
|ruby|semifree|ruby
parabola
674|json module has nonfree CVTUTF code; replace with pure Ruby implementation|
|sdl|semifree|sdl|contains a source file that doesn't mention modification|
|ttf-aller|nonfree|||
|ttf-ubuntu-font-family|nonfree||Ubuntu font license considered non-free by DFSG and Fedora|
|unrar|nonfree|gna-unrar
fsf
unrar|[FIXME:description]|
|unzip|semifree|unzip|contains a source file that doesn't mention modification|
|winetricks|uses-nonfree|winetricks-libre
parabola
366|recommends and installs nonfree software|
|x86_energy_perf_policy|semifree|linux-libre-tools-x86_energy_perf_policy|(linux-tools) Build from the Linux-libre kernel|

+----------------------------+--------------+---------------------------+
| Name | Status | Libre Alternatives |
+----------------------------+--------------+---------------------------+
| blender | uses-nonfree | blender |
| cups-filters | uses-nonfree | cups-filters |
| epiphany | uses-nonfree | epiphany |
| file-roller | uses-nonfree | file-roller |
| gnome-boxes | uses-nonfree | gnome-boxes |
| gst-plugins-bad | uses-nonfree | gst-plugins-bad |
| libosinfo | uses-nonfree | libosinfo |
| licenses | uses-nonfree | licenses |
| linux-firmware | semifree | linux-firmware |
| mplayer | uses-nonfree | mplayer |
| openexr | semifree | openexr |
| p7zip | semifree | p7zip |
| ruby | semifree | ruby |
| sdl | semifree | sdl |
| texlive-core | semifree | texlive-core |
| texlive-latexextra | semifree | texlive-latexextra |
| thunderbird | semifree | icedove |
| unzip | semifree | unzip |
+----------------------------+--------------+---------------------------+

Ah yes interesting.

Do you have a C or Perl version?

>for arch-based distros

Attached: 1478216152117.png (804x906, 46K)

don't be salty bagggman does things your pkg manager doesn't

Nice.

>packages.debian.org/search?keywords=vrms

like spy on what I have installed? yikes

is there a windows version?

"freedom"

mostly complains about nvidia packages and intel-ucode. Stallman index was 97.73.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>using arch

Attached: 1520552439718.jpg (1920x1080, 1.48M)

There's already a program that does this called vrms; better yet it's a maintained package and in the repos already.

Idiot

I don't understand how I have both amd and intel microcode installed.
Non-free packages installed on lenovo

amd64-microcode Processor microcode firmware for AMD CPUs
intel-microcode Processor microcode firmware for Intel CPUs
libfdk-aac0 Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library - runtime files
libfdk-aac1 Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library - runtime files
steam Valve's Steam digital software delivery system

Contrib packages installed on lenovo-ideapad-320-15abr

iucode-tool Intel processor microcode tool
libdvd-pkg DVD-Video playing library - installer
ttf-mscorefonts-installer Installer for Microsoft TrueType core fonts
virtualbox x86 virtualization solution - base binaries
virtualbox-dkms x86 virtualization solution - kernel module sources fo
virtualbox-qt x86 virtualization solution - Qt based user interface
virtualbox-source x86 virtualization solution - kernel module source

5 non-free packages, 0.2% of 2835 installed packages.
7 contrib packages, 0.2% of 2835 installed packages.

can someone put the bsod behind the cages

Done m8.

Attached: bsod.jpg (1920x1080, 2.44M)

Why is qt5-webengine proprietary? I thought it was GPL

but why

it funny thanks

>my pkg mngr senpai won't notice me

i use arch btw :^)

Attached: delicious.jpg (190x265, 12K)

but why

packages.debian.org/sid/vrms
>virtual Richard M. Stallman
kek

prob because qt

But isn't Qt itself GPL?
The difference is that you can pay for a proprietary license that allows you to release proprietary programs linked/built with Qt.

I eat my foot junk. Need I say more?

Why is it a requirement of free software that it shouldn't even be able to support proprietary software? As the end user I should be able to pick and choose what software I want to use.

>want to order pizza online
>wifi module requires nonfree firmware
>twf bontet wants me to starve
vrms
Non-free packages installed on desu

firmware-iwlwifi Binary firmware for Intel Wireless cards

Contrib packages installed on desu

virtualbox x86 virtualization solution - base binaries
virtualbox-dkms x86 virtualization solution - kernel module sources fo
virtualbox-qt x86 virtualization solution - Qt based user interface

1 non-free packages, 0.0% of 3451 installed packages.
3 contrib packages, 0.1% of 3451 installed packages.

It shouldn't give you easy way or hints how to solve your issues using proprietary software. So you install proprietary software only if you know it is proprietary, and not by accident. That's the idea.

something something chrome blobs

>not already using an FSF-approved distro on a Librebooted machine

OP is a raging faggot.

Attached: 2018-11-01-203409_1600x900_scrot.png (1600x900, 119K)

>clone
>run
I don't trust you.

A great question. Because certain supposed free softwares support nonfree softwares or assets, then such softwares do not respect the user's freedom from such nonfree things. Things that hinder the freedoms of users should not be provided from libre software to it's users. Much of the free software community expects to have their freedoms respected in every aspect of their software. If exceptions are made, then that will encourage more exceptions. That can be harmful to free software in general. Further, if some "free" software were to contain things such as media or code that does not fit Stallman's definition of freely-distributable content, then the entire software becomes nonfree. It's the tiny cyanide tablet in an otherwise clean glass of water.

>program doesn't work on gentoo

Worthless

So this is the power........

>Things that hinder the freedoms of users should not be provided from libre software to it's users
There is a difference between giving you a tool and giving you the option of using that tool if you have it. Like
>(mesa) Recommends nonfree software in /etc/drirc
that file has a bunch of game/program specific tweaks, it does nothing if you don't already have such software. saying mesa is very bad because of that file is, in my opinion, taking it too far

>using arch

fuck stallman and the FSF. he consciously echoed Marx when he wrote that stuff, and the movement was going nowhere precisely because he tries to force it on everyone. he couldn't even deliver a kernel and the only reason his stupid movement still exists is because Linux came along and rescued him, and the tiny FSF from it's impending doom. Linux isn't free because they are zealots like Stallman, it's free because it's practical.

i mean you can run it but you don't have pacman so it will only make mustard gas

how did you get this nice list

>some dumb cunt is actually going to do it
ez way to start a botnet. nice job op

Attached: upvoted.png (100x26, 1K)

>if some "free" software were to contain things such as media or code that does not fit Stallman's definition of freely-distributable content
I understand and agree with this part.
>Because certain supposed free softwares support nonfree softwares or assets, then such softwares do not respect the user's freedom from such nonfree things.
This, I do not understand. "Freedom" implies a choice, and so freedom from non free software should equate to a warning that some feature/software I use is non free. Intentionally breaking compatibility with a proprietary program seems like it violates freedom 0 in that it takes the power of decision away from the end user.