Is there any worse VCS than Git?

Is there any worse VCS than Git?

Attached: git.png (330x478, 48K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>xkcd
>computers are le complicated
>xDDDDDDDD

>im too stupid to use it therefore its shit

>hurr you just don't know it right

whats wrong with it?

Yup. Having folders names with different versions

Works on my machine

subversion

subversion, every single VCS invented by microsoft (there are too many for me to remember), cvs (yuck)

Yeah. That is a legitimate criticism.
"I can't use it correctly therefore it is bad" is an absolutely retarded argument.

>Hurr dur
>what is git-reflog?
>what is got reset?
>what is git-checkout?
>What does SHA1 used for?

Don’t be stupid. Git is the only sane VCS out there. See Torvald’s lecture about it at Google. He literally shows you the advantages it has as WHY it’s the most sane VCS.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8

>See Torvald’s lecture about it at Google.
He wrote that system, surely he will vouch for Git.
Mercurial is just for better world.

mercurial

Literally every other vcs is worse than git, so ya op.

>Inb4 much mercurial
Subversion like shitfest which depends on plugins for basic features like branching and still no coherent concept of history
>Inb4 fossil
Meme vcs with shitty tacked on web features that don't work very well for actually collaborating with outside parties like users. Less useful than git Masters like gitea or gitlab.

The rest aren't even worth calling out

How could git be a better VCS than CVS?

>Torvald’s
You mean that SJW?

Fuck off, Satan

ClearCase

>Git is made to be a decentralized system
>they use it as centralized system
ebin

This. What's so decentralized about it?

>git is made to be decentralized
what

It sounds good. Be a nice man and don't question it

Yes. Svn