When did you discover Stallman was a SJW?

Implying Jow Forumstards will understand this when they are as brain dead as the people they hate

B-BUT MUH DRUMPF

Probably before anyone else here. I've always known fucking disgusting commies like this human shit are always SJWs in disguise. It's why you don't give garbage like this any power or platform - that's how you end up with Stalin.

>(Satire)

Glad you let me know.

The time for compromise has long passed. The only solution is the final solution. Zero tolerance.

Fpbp

Good old commie
Love freedome,figth for minores rigths,like retoric discourses, talk about system problems, still could joke, respect leisure time,hobbies, private opinions or political choose.

SJW
Call everybody Nazi or Facist,Call people love facism is don't like communism,use minories to get attention,need control hobbies,private though and shame people didn't vote for leftists candidate, search personal info to public shame people don't like.

geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Richard_Stallman

Stop, you're embarrassing yourself. Why the fuck should I let his opinions on things that aren't tech related influence my decision on if I should use GPL licensed software? They're completely unrelated. It's like me hating you because you think coal mining is totally okay, and I'm against it. It's asinine. As long as two people are alive, they will not agree on everything. It's just a fact of life. Stop putting humans into neat little labels just so you can demonize them and claim a moral high ground

>Good old
>commie
Pick one. Otherwise free helicopter ride for both of you.

>Stallman SJW

Attached: 1j8cg2havkd01.png (645x729, 58K)

>not being an absolut reactionary Jow Forums tard that sucks Trumps cock in a daily basis makes you a SJW commie

Attached: 1540810709763.jpg (500x352, 32K)

This

you got it, fren

How's that CoC taste, SJW-kun?

Stallman's ALWAYS been a commie jew. GPL is the height of judaic legalism. Not sucking Trump's cock just makes him an SJW.

I've known he's a raging progressive leftie since I've looked into him. I wouldn't call him an SJW, though.

Who cares, my technology freedom is more important than your stormfag Jow Forumsitics. Fuck off.

His name lead me to believe this. But I don't see how that's a problem, it has nothing to do with his tech-related work.

He was captivated by Dr. Ford's girlish giggles

This.

based and redpilled

When I glanced through his RSS feed.

fpwp

>A communist jew is also an SJW
What?! No, surely not.

judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/09.26.18 BMK Interview Transcript (Redacted).pdf
>CTRL-F "tactic"
>Phrase not found

Kill yourself my guy.

Stallman is a commie, that has been known for long. He deserves nothing but a nice little ride on a helicopter.

>When did you discover Stallman was a SJW?
The better question is when are you going to discover that free software is, and always has been, a progressive "social justice" political movement?

>implying he is wrong

>I only like things that are popular on Jow Forums
>oh, but it also has to be Jow Forums approved xD!!!!
>Mind of a Sheep: The Post

(dubs)
Who are you quoting?

>nu-g doesn't know about stallman's politics page

Free software is and always has been a political movement based on freedom. It's libertarian, not communist bullshit

>ree about walled-garden platforms and censorship on social media websites
>also ree about stallman being a lefty or something
the absolute state of the american right

terrible bait. If you're going to spread bullshit like this at least learn how to write well.

Attached: 1538703989892.png (960x776, 27K)

Bases Stallone-Man.

wtf

I hate RMS now

Those bracketed numbers are not connected with the references in the footer at the bottom, if they were they would be in superscript. They are just there to itemize a list of statements.
Whatever that reference is referring to is supporting is somewhere earlier on that page.

Here is the full link to the document, literally 5 seconds in google you brainlet.
judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-11-02 CEG to DOJ FBI (Munro-Leighton Referral) with redacted enclosures.pdf

agreed 100%
except tolerating intolerance isn't okay
when people disagree with you and you're nice to them about it
and then when you disagree with them they try to hang you for being a nazi
nothing good is happening from you putting up with them

Like 12 years ago.

Politics is the cancer of this site.

LMAO @ u

judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-11-02 CEG to DOJ FBI (Munro-Leighton Referral) with redacted enclosures.pdf

>clicking on a .gov domain
nice try feds

this. OP is a retard.

there is no left in ameriturd land

Do people forget that Stallman doesn't pick or even publish these news? Someone else does it for him and it doesn't always reflect his standing on issues
Which it's shown on everything Stallman says about FOSS
You mean NPCs
/thread

even the feds aren't interested in you

>everyone who doesn't support my retarded backwards reactionary cult is a fiend

Attached: 1541235722756.png (633x729, 76K)

>mommy look I replied to everyone in the thread!!

Jow Forums I want you to understand why we hate you.
We dont hate you because what you say is "offensive". Remember where the fuck you are, we are each about one click away from watching women with 12 inch cocks fucking each other. And at one point this site even had guro and loli boards. Oh my god he said nigger! This totally shocks my unenlightened sheeple mind.

No, we hate you because you are the new furfags. You see, the problem with furfags wan't that they jerked off to furry shit. It was that they were so fucking obnoxious about it. Everything had to be made furry. Every forum avatar had to be a fursona. They had to constantly broadcast the fact that they were furfags to everyone, and when this was met with derision, they doubled down on their effort. They labeled the rational reaction to their faggotry "fursection" and actively set out to be the biggest faggots they could possibly be to combat it.

Stormniggers are exactly the same. I have yet to see a single board on this site that doesn't regularly have off topic derails about nigger, jews or trump. Always with craftyjew.jpg and A Wyatt Mann cartoons. I doesn't matter HOW off topic it is, Jow Forums users can't help but broadcast the fact that they are stormniggers.

What does the average IQ of blacks have to do with this thread? I mean, really what does it add to the conversation at all? Jack shit. All it does is send out a big loud signal to everyone in the thread that LOOK AT ME! I AM SO RACIST! YOU SHOULD BE OFFENDED!

TL;DR stormfags are just the same as furfags, only their "fursecution" is called "political correctness".

>we
Back to plebbit

>Jow Forumscancer
Back to Jow Forumsthe_donald

lmao newnigger Jow Forums has been racist since long before Jow Forums ever existed

>calling someone a newfag while replying to pasta
lol
>Jow Forums has been racist since long before Jow Forums ever existed
Sure, if by racist you mean edgy teens posting hitler pictures and trolling kids on habbo hotel. Otherwise, no it was not. Jow Forums users did not care about normalfag garbage like muh politics before the scientology crap.

Copyleft is not libertarian.

>Otherwise, no it was not.
Holy shit you are fucking new.
Before Jow Forums existed Jow Forums was literally 1/3rd nigger jokes 1/3rd loli porn and 1/3rd macfag shitposting.

based

>what was /new/

Filtered.

>reactionary
fuck off back to your containment board on 8ch and stay there, communist retard
how sad

Reactionary is what Jow Forums is.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactionary

only left-winger use that word in informal conversations, its something like the term globalism with Jow Forumsacks

you can spot commie brainlets like you easily with this simple trick

>what was /n/
>what was /b/

Not really. Wanting to incorporate aspects of past civilizations (Rome, Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, etc.) is not reactionary, saying "we need to return to 1950 American values and systems" (for example) is. Saying any movement that wants to do anything that has been done before is reactionary is retarded.

You mean you outed me as a non Jow Forumsack? Amazing
>Wanting to incorporate aspects of past civilizations (Rome, Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, etc.) is not reactionary, saying "we need to return to 1950 American values and systems" (for example) is.
The former is reactionary if it is about "restoration", the latter only neoreactionary

I'm not putting up with SJWs, I'm saying that stallman sharing SOME viewpoints with them doesn't justify not using FOSS softeare, agreeing with his stances on software, and other such things. I bet his acceptance and practice of views usually claimed as 'SJW' are quite normal an moderated, not nearly as extreme as we usually see when we think of a SJW holding said belief or doing some action

cringe and bluepilled

>You mean you outed me as a non Jow Forumsack? Amazing
no, you outed yourself as a /leftypol/ack on your own, you are fooling no one

Attached: 3cfa5fc6e663fc126beeba4d02c9c75ec90ead475807fddcf13559d484731101.jpg (850x400, 57K)

on a technical level, sure
stallman's entire crusade for free software is a matter of social justice
he also holds some mildly retarded political views

that being said, he doesn't really act like the SJW crowd and doesn't put up with their bullshit either

Cummy and pinkpilled.

shut it down

youtu.be/bEOx1Taem74

Attached: download (1).jpg (252x291, 29K)

There's literally nothing wrong with my version of communism. You'll see.

communism doesnt work

Attached: 62961992-5F80-4DA9-8B8D-A85564FEAF9D.jpg (585x482, 127K)

Based.

This, and while I might disagree with him politically, I know I can at least email him and politely make my concerns known in the spirit of gnu-kind, which isn't shoved down my throat like a coc.
Stallman looks like a big softy, it's not him that I'm worried about.

I don't think it's so much him being an sjw as it is him not giving a shit about fitting in with other people's opinions. He might occasionally say things that are too sjw-y for Jow Forums one second, but then the next second he's saying shit like "There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia harms children" and the like that would make any sjw (or most people really) cringe.