It's been 4 years god damn it
Where is PCIe 4.0???
Brody Robinson
Jayden Fisher
you mean PCIe 5.0 right?
PCIe 4.0 might never be used
Andrew Phillips
On the Raptor Talos II, Talos II Lite and Blackbird.
x86 shitboxes are late to the party as always.
Nolan Perry
>PCIe 4.0 might never be used
well that sucks
Ethan Thomas
Wrong, PCIe 4.0 is already used by Nvidia in Xavier
developer.nvidia.com
>5x PCIe gen4 (16GT/s) controllers | 1x8, 1x4, 1x2, 2x1 Root port and endpoint
Next-gen Nvidia 7nm GPUs will most likely have PCIe 4.0 support
Lucas Garcia
>Xavier
meme crap
Thomas Jenkins
Jayden Moore
Maybe won't go PC and PC jump to PCIe5.0
Nicholas Nelson
you don't need it, you just think the higher number makes it better.
Xavier Cruz
we need it for m.2
Robert Lopez
You mean PCIe 3.1 gen 1?
Tyler Wilson
How fast, are the fastest SSDs right now. When can we finally repace RAM by SSD for memory?
Alexander Rivera
No you dont, you're just another specsheet shopping consumer whore like the other brainless warring consumer whores of this cancerous board.
A mainstream high perg ssd like the 970 barely saturates a 2x link.
William Wilson
*high perf
John Barnes
Nope NAND SSD had high latency,block adress and low random readers than RAM, PCIE is too high latency to replace RAM.
Only Optane DIMM could support RAM but still don't replace RAM memory
Charles Richardson
>BUTTMAD AYYMDPOORFAGS DETECTED
Nvidia shipped PCIe 4.0 first in 2018 beating AYYMD again which won't ship anything until 2019
Aiden Sanders
I know talos II uses it.
As for consumers we might just see an immediate jump to 5.0
Cooper Ramirez
Henry Ward
A good article showcasing why AMD's market cap is 20b, rather than, say 130b.
Grayson Nguyen
amd should sell themselves to China
Aaron Morris
>m.2
that's the connector type, which SATA can use.
you meant "NVMe".
Zachary Peterson
No. You couldn't even if you tried. NAND isn't bit-addressable and it wouldn't work.
You could do so with SCM like 3D XPoint, but it would need to A) Connect directly to the CPU like RAM, not through M.2 (not a big deal, Intel has already been sampling that), and B) Need to be a hell of a lot faster than it is today. FRAM and the other options are also unsuitable, due also to lack of commercial availability.
That is the direction computing is headed though. Super-duper long term.
Landon Thomas
Understand.
But I would still like to try it. Could I run a virtual machine on a ramdisk and try persistent data structures. Maybe it will be not as bad for certain cases, since I do not have to read the disk first, just to set up my data structures.
Jackson Sullivan
GEN-Z when?