retard screenshotted edited >Create a parts list pcpartpicker.com/ >Learn how to build a PC Search youtube for a guide for your socket
Want help? >State your budget & CURRENCY >List your uses; eg Gaming, Video Editing, VM Work >For monitors, include purpose and graphics pairing >NO Speccy. Use HWinfo
CPU >Athlon 200GE - Bare minimal desktop/gaming >R3 2200G - Light gaming(dGPU optional) >R5 2400G/i5-8400 - Consider IF on sale >R5 2600/X - Good gaming & multithreaded work use CPUs >i7-9700k/8700k - If you have a $2000+ budget and don't care that it'll be superseded by 7nm CPUs next year >R7 2700/X - Best value high-end CPU on a non-HEDT platform >Wait for R7 3700X - Surely the best overall and not a massive disappointment like the 9900k >Threadripper/Used Xeon - HEDT
RAM >8GB - Enough for most gaming use >16GB - Standard for heavy use >32GB - If you have to ask, you don't need this >CPUs benefit from fast RAM; 2933MHz+ is ideal
Graphics cards >RTX 2000 cards are worse performance per $ than previous gen >Avoid cheap MODELS ie MSI Armor (Mk2 is ok), Gigabyte G1/Wf, ASUS dual, and others w/ small heatsinks and low quality fans 1080p >RX 570/580 w/ Freesync or 1060 6GB - standard 1080p 60fps+ options >1050 3Gb or RX560 4Gb - lower settings and/or older games >GTX 1070Ti/Vega 56 - for higher FPS w/ a high hz monitor 1440p >Vega 56; 1070Ti/1080 if you already have Gsync >GTX 1080Ti - for higher FPS w/ a high hz monitor 4K >Upscale from 1620-1800p. Maybe 2080Ti, but awful value. OpenCL use >Vega 64
Storage >Backup before using StoreMi >Consider getting a larger SSD (better GB/$) instead of small SSD & large HDD >2TB HDDs are barely more $ than 1TB >M.2 is a form factor, NOT a performance standard >NVMe are not for gaming; See "More"
Display >Consider 75hz minimum; 60hz are mostly old models. >Always consider FreeSync w/ AMD cards >PLAN YOUR BUILD AROUND YOUR MONITOR IF GAMING
>pic shows 2700x with fast ram getting btfo by intel which doesn't even benefit from fast ram >the user calling bullshit of that pic is unironically right What did the OP shill mean by this?
Kevin Cox
Assumption on a whole new level. I wouldn't be mentioning the option to turn off notch if I was an applefag. I hate apple. But hey, no argument, only shitflinging, so I'll take the W on this one. Keep crying about people buying things you don't like for no real reason if you want to.
Ryan Young
>Even with the 8700k also having 3466 MHz B-die RAM, the 2700X often gets better 1% minimums. >intel has higher minimums >who cares it's only 20%, 20frames nobody cares now rendering videos there is an important thing >ryzen beats a stock intel at only minimums by 3 frames >INTEL IS FINISHEEEED God it feels repugnant to share hardware with these retarded fanatics
Kayden Murphy
>hur dur don't worry you'll get a 10% performance increase from a 10% clock speed increase uh huh.
I'm sure you think that's correct. I'm reading it. I get what you're trying to write. It's just not correct. Things don't scale 1:1 like that.
53.2 is higher than 50.3, mate. And that's not with "cheap RAM" on the Intel CPU where it only gets 46.3.
Alexander Myers
No one buys your bullshit. Even with fast ram 2700x is a lot worse.
>that test doesn't count >only this test with slower RAM counts >haha who would put high end RAM with a high end CPU??? get cheapest!! Who cares if you lose FPS, you got the best CPU xddddddd Can't make this shit up. Not to mention what a total outlier some of these results are. 57% faster in Total War? Yeah fucking right.
Nicholas Ward
post the 1440p chart I don't care about baby res
Henry Adams
could the following be able to play games on even low/mid settings?
