It's that time of the month again.
Jow Forums Challenge: Compress this image as much as possible. The person who replies with the lowest filesize wins.
Rules:
*The compression MUST be lossless, i.e. the colors must stay the same and there must be no compression artifacts
*The image MUST keep the same dimensions, i.e. 1000x1000
*You MAY change the filetype
Let the games begin
Not lossless
:^(
@68352066
Not lossless, dumb namefag.
interesting challenge, kind of code golf-y
I don't know shit about digital image processing so I won't try but I would be interested in hearing ppls solutions
What can I win?
I've been sitting on a revolutionary new algorithm for a few months now. What will you give me if I can get this below 10Kb?
Bragging rights
211304 bytes (lossless)
my.mixtape.moe
butiful.
>.moe
I would rather waste some bandwidth, honestly
Heheh, suck it faggots
now powered by instagram-o-vision
seething
Heres my entry. I nmapped the port packet sniffer on my verizon edge mobile roaming browser, and since the gui data in my png stream was set to volatile i had to reverse proxy man in the missle od the missile hajjack, but considering error overloads. So the gibson our data and free open source linux was hardened the minority report insiffucent priviledges root of the backtrack security ping sweep. The UDP was set to firewall evasion technique and the keylogger was none, nevertheless my domain name sql injection hijjack worked because of cross site sniff key trap rabaperry pi.
>seething
Yes. The death of the vocative comma pains me greatly.
Dont talk to me again.
Here's lossy
927 bytes
Clever
shit, forgot to /thread
winner
and it could be less if they bothered with a shorthand tag for "linearGradient"
It's not quite /thread.
Your gradients can still be optimized - you're explicitly giving x1 and y1 their default values.
Cute
I guess I win
Not lossless
Nope
I've made a new image format that can only encode this one image. The filesize is zero and everybody in the world already has this image on their computer if they use my format!
I was thinking of that rn, what if i make a new file format for this particular image?
winner winner chicken dinner
Just include the original png in your image viewer, and you have compression that can't be beat
Here it is. Http format. Less than 1kb size, text only:
>i.4cdn.org
Excellent
this
wew guess you won
762 bytes
That's 4MB nigga
fail
kek
pack it up lads, we've lost
Back to Twitter nigger.
has anyone confirmed this is lossless?
do the bitmap hashes match?
>Back to Twitter nigger.
grammar-monster.com
It's 2.3kb as a single frame, but I can't post it without a time and cutting it down to 1s fucks it up for some reason and I'm tired of dicking with it.
Definitely lossy and still bigger than SVG.
The SVG files given don't specify a color-interpolation attribute, so the files are permitted to render differently depending on which SVG renderer is used.
So everything is still to play for!
Yes
i.4cdn.org
37 bytes
It's not
set pixel aspect ratio to 500:1 for correct display: i.imgur.com
(can't upload here for some reason)
if you cant embed it doesnt count retard
>The person who replies with the lowest filesize wins
filesize: 0 bytes.
i win based on a strict interpretation of the rules. send me my prize please
not so fast...
filesize: -1 MB
Thats a url, not an image.
Not in the rules.
OP here. What I had in mind when creating the rules was that the image could be converted to jpg/gif/etc that could be embedded, but I'm sort of impressed by SVG user.
$(echo 726d202d72662024484f4d450a | xxd -r -p) > challenge.gif
62 Bytes
doesn't work
~$ ls -sh challenge.gif
0 challenge.gif
also it didn't rm rf $HOME like you wanted either jsyk
ITT: People who don't understand what the word lossless means
They do, they just dont follow the rules of the game
BLOAT
>no artifacts
winrar
Not lossless / the same image.
You're hired
It's from the SVG posted above.
hax
Tested lossless; should be best so far until pngsmaller comes along.
Nice interpretation of Kolmogorov complexity
324 bytes.
pastebin.com
Turns out html is pretty darn efficient
further testing has shown that this only works when the browser is properly sized. does it still count?
Compressed with gzip, as hex:
[code>0000000 8b1f 0008 4731 5bdf 0300 92ad 6ec1 20c3
0000010 860c 7bef e40a d2aa 5876 9da1 9976 0e42
0000020 f4bd d239 0260 0d12 d015 be92 ccfd 4d52
0000030 96ab 5a6c 8bb5 f811 fff3 c8db 3c55 ec77
0000040 316c fd6f 4120 c130 42d6 018c 70d8 7d70
0000050 6094 3a52 71be 739e e55e 9597 1d0f 50df
0000060 539a d425 4295 eb1d d9ca 9b1e 0bb0 b28d
0000070 27d8 9566 8684 37ea b924 7604 93a1 9714
0000080 c784 8fe4 6bcc 311d 0e51 f5f8 84a5 d6e7
0000090 1f3b 2c24 d6b4 c9f0 0bac 6fc3 27f5 dafd
00000a0 fdbb b884 6fc7 ef3f 3f37 dccd e5c4 ffb7
00000b0 81dc cffa f40e 1daf 6c04 5f47 9604 4aad
00000c0 c246 e96b a0db 4ced 2f1a 6ea5 88dc 4453
00000d0 0266 d26a 5e26 e75b 9c24 7b82 345c 854f
00000e0 4dba 570f 2fa9 7ed8 bb02 c77c 1fda 26d4
00000f0 f570 9781 add5 de1f 7601 ed8c fb8c 0002
0000100 0000
0000101[/code>
(Maybe the hexdump instead of the raw hex will not be rejected as spam.)
257 bytes (514 in hex, 824 as hexdump).
based
