He still uses for-loops

>he still uses for-loops

Attached: opening-pic-friends-laughing.jpg (450x300, 55K)

Other urls found in this thread:

channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/2013/Cpp-Seasoning
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Not me, I use for-comprehensions.

Jokes on you I only use lookup tables

care to explain what's wrong with them?

Iterators and sequences are better. You should use more functional means to evaluate a set.

>Iterators and sequences are better.
show me some assembly (no opti and -O2) and benchmarks.
Link me papers on the subject.
>You should use more functional means to evaluate a set.
again, why?
You're spouting opinions like they're facts but nothing to back them up.

Because I said so. Now get back to your cubicle.

>He's still doing OOP

It's not about benchmarks. It's about immutability.

I only use if loops.