>he still uses for-loops
He still uses for-loops
Other urls found in this thread:
channel9.msdn.com
twitter.com
Not me, I use for-comprehensions.
Jokes on you I only use lookup tables
care to explain what's wrong with them?
Iterators and sequences are better. You should use more functional means to evaluate a set.
>Iterators and sequences are better.
show me some assembly (no opti and -O2) and benchmarks.
Link me papers on the subject.
>You should use more functional means to evaluate a set.
again, why?
You're spouting opinions like they're facts but nothing to back them up.
Because I said so. Now get back to your cubicle.
>He's still doing OOP
It's not about benchmarks. It's about immutability.
I only use if loops.