Linus, the creator of Linux uses Fedora. Why don't you use Fedora Jow Forums...

Linus, the creator of Linux uses Fedora. Why don't you use Fedora Jow Forums? It is a professional enterprise grade OS for developers who want a stable OS without sacrificing cutting edge features.

Attached: lin-1024x740.jpg (1024x740, 88K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645400
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Attached: 1509877023276.jpg (749x1006, 114K)

I use dora the blue hat explorer

Attached: fedora.jpg (400x400, 26K)

Just upgraded to 29, in fact *tips hat*.
>t.the non-meme distro Jow Forums never talks about, shhhhhh.

Attached: geegraph.png (1920x1080, 120K)

This Guy is so frikin annoying
Also looks like Massagran, same chin

Attached: massagran.jpg (200x155, 21K)

>professional enterprise grade OS for developers
no, it's not. Fedora is a unstable test-bed for IBMs RHEL distribution. That's what it is.

It's a fine distro for most people but it's absolutely not "professional" and definitively not "enterprise grade".

>professional
That's not how you write "beta". Here's an example from this week,
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645400
Fedora pushed a buggy version of GCC which built broken code to stable. Then their build system started using this broken version which resulted in broken packages being built and pushed as stable. This affected a few including MESA which is essential to most graphics related things.

The above is not how you describe something that's "enterprise grade". Fedora's just a way of beta-testing for RHEL.

>absolutely not "professional" and definitively not "enterprise grade"
>RHEL
>literally have enterprise in its name

k

It may be upstream of RHEL, but it's more stable thank half of the other distros shilled daily on Jow Forums.

That's the wrong Linus mate.

Source that it's unstable? It just werks like Ubuntu if not better.

maybe the fact that its a bleeding-edge distro would tell you something
or are you completely braindead?
bleeding-edge = not good for enterprise

Arch or Debian testing are bleeding edge faggot, not fedora. Fedora is not even on kernel 4.19 yet.

>I never use the stable branch of any distro ever and don't know what life without Poettering/FreeDesktop.org-ware is
The post

fedora is just RHEL testing, now fuck off

y not CentOS tho?
Isn't it liberated Red Hat? Or unbugged Fedora?

You mean IBM Enterprise Linux

Does fedora has their font as default one?

MYTH - Fedora is unstable and unreliable, just a testbed for bleeding-edge software
FACT - This myth comes from misunderstanding two things:

>Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is derived from Fedora every few years.
>Fedora has rapid releases, a short life-cycle, and a lot of new code.

The first item means that Red Hat uses Fedora as a platform to promote the development of new technology, some of which might end up in Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and be inherited by other derivative distributions. Red Hat contributes to Fedora efforts in the same way as any other contributor can. Fedora provides a platform in which any contributor, large or small, can integrate and offer technologies for a large audience of consumers. This does not mean that Fedora is untested, it simply means that Fedora is a rapidly progressing platform.

>For the second item, this does mean that Fedora is often running in uncharted innovative territory, but not that it is using too-new code. The programs in Fedora are generally stable releases or well-tested pre-release versions. There are guidelines behind the inclusion of pre-release software, and thorough testing is always done prior to Fedora releases. Refer to QA for more information about our extensive quality testing practices, which, like all other Fedora teams, are open to community participation.

Each new Fedora release receives updates from the Fedora community for two subsequent releases, plus one month -- on average, about thirteen months. We do everything we can to make sure that the final products released to the general public are stable and reliable. Fedora has proven that it can be a stable, reliable, and secure platform, as shown by its popularity and broad usage. Additionally, our well-managed packaging and review process adds an extra layer of safety not found in some other distributions.

>You can count on Fedora.

taken from their site, to say its similar to a stable release is stupid

tried it for two years, then switched to arch
never coming back desu

Attached: IT6322A-Front.jpg (1024x768, 104K)