>Dude 10 bit color encoding LMAO >4K UltraHD with 120Hz >That 50GB BD remux of a two hour movie >HDR >60 FPS bro >Direct sound passthrough LMAO >HDMI 2.1 >H.265 hardware acceleration >8K is already here hahaha
There is only one thing I feel worth mentioning: I have a 720p TV and I tried watching actual 720p rips of high quality and most basic 400p avis and guess what - no difference! So if I bought an 1080p device I'd be shilling for that shit all day cuz I just overpaid but in all honesty is 400p vs 4k even noticeable? I would expect people presented with video of both resolutions to fail identifying which one is higher, just like hardcore fans cannot distinguish between Pepsi and Cola IRL.
Diminishing returns. I can definitely tell 720p from 1080p but not 1080p from 2160p. Same with 30 from 60 and 60 from 120.
Michael Sullivan
>but not 1080p from 2160p. Of course you can't, there's no 2160p content atm, only upscaled from 1080p.
No doubt, but that is marketing, they'll just play worse video on 720p to trick people into buying higher end product. Honestly would do the same cuz business is about getting bucks right?
Bro I know that is 4k and also the fact: all content is upscaled. You can turn any 1080p or 720p or 400p into 4k with some ffmpeg "magic"
Jacob Nelson
(You)
Xavier Jenkins
>plenty of content 10% of shows and even fewer movies
also >watching content only because it's 4k >I don't even like snooker but it's 4K MAN! Talk about a bugman.
Josiah Bell
10bit a shit. 12bit is where it's at nigga. 10bit still exhibits banding.
Grayson Bell
>he hasn't watched emma watson aging gracefully in 4k during the Harry Potter octology
Robert Reed
>watching/reading that garbage >ever >costanza-with-a-bat.gif
Levi Lopez
What encoders to use for proper 12-bit encoding though? x265 is shit at it.
Benjamin Gomez
All i can say to you op is remux videos of japanese animation looks incredible on my 32 inch 1080p A-IPS. I sit pretty close to it so I dont need bigger but let me tell you Redline was the movie that convinced me that high rez and better color is the future. It was absolutely breathtaking.
Sebastian Sanders
>I'm poor jealous troll: the thread
Oliver Reyes
>32 inch 1080p >I sit pretty close Yeah I'm pretty sure that you can't actually tell whether something looks good or not. Sorry to hear about your blindness
Jack Roberts
actually im in japan and my place is quite small so w/e
Kevin Scott
at first I laughed and was amused at your post, thinking this is probably the best bait ever made in history, but then you wrote >but in all honesty is 400p vs 4k even noticeable and first I laughed out loud, but then I felt disgusted with how shitty this bait really is
>Harry potter >4k >A movie started in early 2000 What could it be if not the upscale?
(you)
Stop bullying little Harry please. First 3 films were actually comfy and the books weren't that bad. Most people who shit on them want to pretend they're muh adult and contrarian to the mainstream and fail to realize there are prolly very few more mainstream things than bashing harry potter.
Ethan Gutierrez
harry is a gay little, stupid faggot we all watched just because we wanted to pound hermoine into oblivion, and you know it
Andrew Morris
>What could it be if not the upscale? I was going to say a remaster but then I realized it's all CGI and green screen.
>Most people who shit on them want to pretend they're muh adult and contrarian to the mainstream and fail to realize there are prolly very few more mainstream things than bashing harry potter. I'm not trying to be edgy, I've never seen or read any of them. I just didn't see the appeal in a scrawny, beta faggot escaping into a closeted world of (((wonder))) and (((fantasy))).
Gavin Allen
>Netflix >Content Choose one
Owen Phillips
Well, technically speaking, content targeted for 14-year-old girls is still content.
Jose Jackson
>What could it be if not the upscale? They were shot on film, meaning you can just scan the orginal film with higher resolution. 35mm can have the equivalent of up to 6K resolution.
Ian Green
Anime is mastered sub 2k so who cares. It's cheap garbage that will be wholly cgi in a few more years. The history of the artform since the switch to digital has been "how do we crank out shows faster" and you're seeing the answer progressively illuminated year after year. The answer of course being "excise human hands". The problem isn't the technology per se but when the central premise driving technological adoption is speed then you reap what you sow. If the question people were asking themselves after the digital transition was "how can we create things impossible to shoot on film" we'd have a very different landscape created by the same technological transition.
Leo Bell
>I tried watching actual 720p rips of high quality and most basic 400p avis and guess what - no difference! consider having your eyesight checked
Joshua Peterson
>books weren't that bad never watched the movies, but dropped the first book after 200 pages when I was 11 because of how shitty and erratic her writing is, even the translation to french couldn't mask that Eragon is a more memorable series than those pieces of trash, and Eragon sucks cock The most memorable books from my childhood have to be the Chronicles of Narnia, those were the shit