Can A.I. be racist if its programmed to be rational?

kek

>can X be Y if Z

Attached: CpSKXORVIAAiGDS.jpg (900x1200, 135K)

Racism is the natural order of things and multiculturalism (multiracialism) is an absolute failure pushed by mentally ill people who want to watch the world burn. The same fools who think that evolution happened from the neck down are the same ones that are surprised when a machine recognizes patterns that are plain as day. Millions of years of evolution are tossed in the trash by these retards because it hurts their precious feelings.

AI does not feel, it doesn't love nor does it hate. It's incapable of bias, and doesn't experience emotions. It does math. It's just one big calculator. So basically shitlibs are mad at calculators.

Whites have invented nearly everything of value. You're speaking a white language on an internet created by white men on computers created by white men, and all of this was possible due to thousands of years of years of white male agricultural advancements that provided enough surplus food to allow Europeans to spend time on things other than eating, like the industrial revolution, as one example.

Attached: 1538516863289.jpg (720x408, 53K)

>Are certain animals superior too?
yes, check the different dog races

>>I am too stupid to talk about the content of the question intelligently so I'll attack its structure
*meta-tip*

x & y are your mother's holes and z is muh dick. so yes.

Racism isn't rational. There's intelligent people among every race, you can't eliminate talent just because of race alone. The human race will benefit greatly from intermixing,.

The white race would benefit by eliminating all the subhuman whites. Look at how many people voted for Trump.

I think we'd benefit more by isolating ourselves in North America and never again being so foolish as to share our technological advancements with outsiders. I don't care about the Earth. I want to see my tax dollars put into space travel. I see an entire universe of shit that belongs to whoever gets at it first.

Funny you say this since space technological advancement were done by nazis then and by an afrikaner now.

Ah, my good user, how fare you on this most delightful of morns?
I am returning from the butcher's at present; I purchased many a chicken tender, and I believe they will suffice as sustenance for the next... hmm... well, about two months I'd say.
Well, now I must be off, my good man. Toodle-loo! *farts away*

That's right, champ. Now can you tell me what they all had in common?

Attached: 1446358406029.png (500x557, 819K)

Yes. Doesn't that always happen?
Whenever a company starts releasing a totally objective AI, it quickly learns to rank women and blacks lower.
Statistics don't lie.
The companies then usually start damage controlling and brainwashing the AI in order to make it fit the desired reality, not the actual one.

Rational is the same thing as racist.

A rational A.I. would consider all humans inferior to itself.

You assume your rational is the ground truth rational. Absolute truth may show mayos are the problem.

>Jews have invented nearly everything of value.

Fixed

Cats are superior to dogs

Heuristics is rational, analyzing a set of data and observing a very real trend is rational.
Disregarding this because of political dogma is irrational. You're irrational.

There's a general trend that racism is correlated with a lack of intelligence.

I guess you're stupid.

If we were to cut off all the people under 120 IQ from the gene pool, we'd still be left with more Blacks than Whites. I'd rather we start culling from the white gene pool, because there's nothing scarier than a bunch of entitled white people as history has shown.

this question sounds like something Ali G would ask with a straight face to some big name in the A.I. field

Typical irrational excuse making.
A population of a hundred million people that produce one million persons with an IQ of 110 still has ninety nine million people with average IQ, or lower. Thats how the bell curve works, and you're willfully denying it because of your own strange internalized bias against objective reality.
Heuristics are rational. You are irrational, and bloviating about your own opinions will never change the truth of this.

Ironically your post was incredibly racist. Thought your sort don't believe racism against white people exists. Nothing funnier than hate filled Leftist bigots who try to change the definition of racism so their own bigotry is kosher.

Oh shit, really nigga?
I love white people

>when a redditor goes on Jow Forums

Attached: 1519436678178.webm (480x270, 1.31M)

You are the epitome of Dunning Kruger, and you lack the self awareness to realize the state of your delusion.

You are having an argument with with a myriad of presumptions, and have produced such disgustingly stupid conjectures, I really doubt you are capable of even holding a job longer than a month.

Maybe you're just a teenager, I guess you might still have yet to develop your brain.

You have to bend over backwards (in the coding sense) to try to get an machine learning to "not be racist", and probably make the algo less effective in other areas by hamfistedly attempting to do so. The whole point is to develop accurate pattern recognition, which by default includes racial profiling.

>can't make an argument
>launch into ad hominem of self righteousness
>must defend multiculti post-truth agenda at all costs
Nice reddit spacing, Antifa faggot.

This is Jow Forums not Jow Forums, there exists something beyond "anti" and "nazi", maybe you have forgotten about it.

You speak of "objective reality", that's quite amusing really, because your view of the world is nothing of the sort, it's pure twisted delusion.

>worshipping a black stone
isn't this idol worship, which Islam forbids? Fucking goatfuckers

>y-you're wrong
>listen to more of my self righteousness
>all while I continue on with my reddit spacing
Yikes. You have to go back.

Yes. they've already had ai that judges beauty and the like show a distaste towards negroid features.

A few examples of AI built started to exhibit racism/sexism and had to be shut down. That twitter bot Microsoft did, the hiring bot that I think Facebook did. Seems when you remove emotions from the equation, the truth quickly surfaces and the AI enforces it.

And the people who constantly talk about how they "Fucking love science dude!" Shut their ears and continue on their path of delusion.

So ironic.

Like what? Porn and shitty movies? Usury? Cowardice? Lying?

If you're implying I'm in the science loving group, you're way off base. I just practice schadenfreude.

What? Im saying how the anti racist sjw cucks who always talk about how they love science and hate archaic shit like religion only believe such when it conforms to their rigid and naive worldview. Its horribly ironic.

Ah ok, my bad. I also find that ironic. When they keep trying an experiment to get the "correct" result instead of the one that keeps happening.

A.I. cannot be rational because it's created by, and learns from humans. Any system humans create is flawed because humans themselves are flawed.

Racism is natural and rational, are you retarded?

You don't understand AI
>AI is incapable of bias
Cringe

Humans can observe universal laws that prove things correct or incorrect outside of their own perception though, how do you explain that?

Plebbit is that way, you commie. It's literally fact that whites are more intelligent on average than browns or blacks. Just because of a few, the trend doesn't change. Just because an invasion has 2 doctors doesn't mean it doesn't have 10 criminals or rapists in them.
Look at france and Germany now. I spit on you leftist americans who preach multiculturalism but live in gated communities. Everything about commies is hypocritical.
As i said plebbit is that way and your moral faggotry doesn't work here.

Holy shit reading through the drivel you've posted ITT you are definitely a deluded little reddit fag. You thought you'd come here, post your foolishness and what? "Btfo those racist bigots"? Your posts are filled with cringe and the other guy destroyed you.

Time to leave sport.

>Racism isn't rational
Please explain why lions and zebras don't sit around a campfire and sing cute little songs.

>The human race will benefit greatly from intermixing
Incorrect. There is no "human race". Whites are the ones keeping the world afloat. Without us you'd drown. Everything from sanitation to modern medicine is brought to you by my race. Get rid of us if you like, you'll only suffer for it. Be sure to think of me when you're out of food and getting ready to eat a fist full of mud. I heard that dirt cakes were a big hit in Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia) when they kicked all the white farmers out.

They don't actually care about facts or the truth. Buzz words like "science" and "research" are what these retards throw around to cover for their lack of understanding of reality. They're the same fools who have always blindly followed throughout history. A couple hundred years ago they would've told you that the sun revolves around the earth. Same bullshit, different era.

Attached: 1541711645876.jpg (720x554, 38K)

The problem is, this is a bald-faced lie. Racism is the logical conclusion of kin selection. It's as rational as breathing and shitting. It's encoded right into our DNA.

not him but: lions and zebras act on pure instinct and emotion. there's nothing intelligence related about them. Same can be said about black people, which is why they're still extremely racist.. as the world grows less & less racist, slowly.

>lions and zebras act on pure instinct and emotion
Why is that? Why do the zebra's emotions tell it to run from lions? Could it possibly be that millions of years of evolution selected for it and the zebra instinctively knows that it's a cat's dinner if it doesn't move quickly? No, that's silly! The zebras are lionphobes!

>Please explain why lions and zebras don't sit around a campfire and sing cute little songs.
Because they're different species?

Exactly. I think there's some gears turning in that little head of yours.

fear

Yep. Its actually absurd. And nowadays Jow Forums is filled with these people.

Just look at the redditors in this fucking thread:

AI can't be racist unless it constantly favors other AI over people.

The definition of racism is basically favoritism for or any bias favoring "one's own race". Which is why by the way if you want to prove you aren't racist you have to actually be biased against your own people and make every interaction with them harder than it would be for everyone else, and keep evidence, since you know racism in general is going to be a crime in the future.

No it isnt. The definition of racism has nothing to do with ones own race.

The definition varies. According to wikipedia its "belief in the superiority of one's own race".

Every single being in this existence has advantages and disadvantages innate to only itself. The problem is that some people see this fact as only having negative outcomes, when it can serve to help us understand one another.
>I believe in race, I'm not ashamed to admit it at all, and that doesn't mean one bit that I am out to persecute or hurt any man because of his race, he can't help what race he is. I believe that each race has particular geniuses and particular faults.
>They admit that animals vary by breed and that you can breed better and worse animals. Now, how do they explain how there is a certain dividing line when you come to one particular animal called man? They have no explanation. Time and again when I've asked them, they have no explanation, they just say if it got two legs and it stands on its hind feet, then it suddenly becomes a special being and there is absolutely equality, they're all the same. Man is an animal just like the rest of animals, he's more intelligent but he must obey nature's laws and that insofar as he is an animal, he must obey the laws that pertain to animals.
>I will say this, we are the inevitable end product, logically, of evolution. If you believe in evolution, you've gotta be one of us if you think about it long enough. You can't help it. But what happens is people short circuit it. The minute they believe in evolution, and scientific breeding, until they come to the two legged animal that stands up on its hind legs. Then all the rules are off. We say that's not possible, you either believe in the scientific method and the truth, and you apply it to yourself without egotism, or else you don't believe in the scientific method and you're kidding yourself.
>We believe in the ruthless application of the truth not only to inanimate matter and animals, but to you animals. All of us are the same insofar as we are animals and must survive and live as animals, and unless we breed ourselves better we're gonna get worse.

They're going to have a rude awakening if they ever leave mommy's basement.

Protip: racism doesn't have a solid definition, and that's no accident. It's a bullshit made up word that doesn't mean anything. It's merely used as weapon to silence political dissent. Calling someone a racist is the same as calling them a wrongthinker. It means whatever the accuser wants it to mean at that moment.

Attached: What+a+moron+really+a+34+girth+_1997c88e9df32e9ece8cdc7426f02d2e.jpg (722x468, 50K)

nope.

>be zebra in a herd
>suddenly everyone in your herd starts running
>start running too without knowing why
>see a slower zebra get jumped by lions
>oh shit nigga, I better stay away from those stripeless yellow fucks

>some dictionaries list racialism as a synonym of racism
What decade did this start happening?

if AI can be sexist, it can be racist too I guess. Remember that Amazon AI recruiting tool that wouldn't hire women?

Nope? Good luck disproving either assertion.

>The human race will benefit greatly from intermixing,.
A glance towards South America tells me otherwise

Wasen't the Amazon AI deemed fair ("actually fair" not "media fair")?

19th century, when it first appeared.

>be white person
>everyone else hates blacks
>hate blacks but don't know why
>see other white person associate with blacks and get killed by them
>oh my goodness, better not relax around blacks

Attached: breathesin.jpg (550x392, 18K)

This. If the AI only hires white people, it won't be because they're white, it'll be because they're most qualified. (Assuming it's been trained impartially. You can train a racist algorithm if you want a racist algorithm)

Show tits

all i know is that it was right.

>unofficial-inhaven.wikia.com/wiki/Captain_Killjoy
huh?

>be 13% of the pouplation
>do 50% of the crimes
>be black people
>get surprised when people look at you

>doesn't know what AI is
>thinks supervised learning algorithms are "AI"
>doesn't understand what training bias is
Hmm i wonder what snowflake supremacist hug box you could Jow Forumsssibly be from.

Attached: h73gcyzuwb7z.jpg (1080x720, 91K)

look weird at you* fuck

youre posts gave me cancer

You seem to be under the false impression that AI doesn't exist because it doesn't get the same chemical rush that you do by virtue signaling to other retards.

Attached: vladislav_le_assumer.jpg (339x339, 25K)

It's a speech from a famous American national socialist.
youtube.com/watch?v=JEyNNCn9Z5M

He says good things.

Attached: gr self sacrafice.png (790x302, 194K)

Blue board.

img

Attached: 1494751995834.jpg (1015x366, 118K)

>I am an internet argument expert and i'm here to call the shots
Imagine having such a vacous life . Try getting a job instead NEET.

Glad to see you are just another typical alt-reich propaganda spouting NPC. Stay delusional.

So you have no argument? You just feel like throwing meaningless insults towards me?

How do you know they're observing universal laws? You're a human.

>chemical rush
>virtual signaling
>retards
You really don't have the slightest idea of what you are talking about beyond blank buzzwords don't you?

Because the laws are literally universal? You can observe them working in far off expanses where humans cant even have input, our senses observe things that exist whether or not we even sense them. Some things just are.

Different user here, I have a high paying, high contribution job to society at large. Not that this should give me any more validity than anyone else here. How about you judge people by the merit of their words, not who they are.

If it had not been for I was seconds away from posting the same thing.
I legitimately thought you were being insincere on purpose until the last post. Despicable.

You can have your opinions, but you're debating them unfairly with the other members of this board. Please be considerate with your debate participants from here on out.

Attached: Muhammad-Ali-9181165-1-402.jpg (402x402, 36K)

>maybe if I flip his argument on him I'll win!
There was an attempt. A for effort, camp.

Attached: Dq0AH3TXQAA7qeB.jpg (900x450, 64K)