Explain why this distro never comes up, especially given pic related?
Explain why this distro never comes up, especially given pic related?
Isaiah Lee
Other urls found in this thread:
news.softpedia.com
twitter.com
Ryan Sullivan
>It's a bit less convenient than Ubuntu, for example because external software manufactures don't provide packages for it as often.
>It's not inconvenient enough to compare with Arch and other such distros that people use because they want to fiddle around.
Chase Powell
no proprietary drivers in official repos.
I don't trust third party repos
Connor Davis
You shouldn't trust proprietary drivers
Andrew Thompson
You shouldn't trust a proprietary image board.
Levi Martinez
I need them for wifi
Carter Wood
I don't trust this place though.
You don't need wifi.
Jeremiah Torres
because Jow Forums is filled with arch pseudo minimalist spergs
t. fedora user. it just werks.
Justin Brown
redhat is pajeets who aren't pozzed, it's alright unusable without 3rd party repos though because they strip crypto/codecs out of everything (fedora got mp3 support in 2017)
David Cook
using fedora + kde right now
damn comfy
Jaxson Smith
RPMfusion is needed for pretty much anything multimedia but I don't think adding 1 (or 2 if you have a good reason for nonfree) is that big of a hassle. I haven't found a package manager with an as comprehensive and intuitive history feature set as dnf which is useful if you think you've messed something up.
I am kinda worried about the next couple of years now that IBM has bought RH. Not sure where I would go if they killed support for Fedora.
Nathan Lewis
because this is a neet site. Fedora is all you need by default to start doing shit. That's why neets here hate it. The installer lets you set an encrypted LVM setup exactly as you want in no time, there are groups of compilers and libraries so that you don't need to get into too much dependency hell. Also is corporate supported meaning it won't have a lot of hippie hipsters like on debian and actual good packagers, another point against neets. Also the package manager is the best, better than apt and pacman.
Isaiah Adams
Those who use it don't talk about it because if just werks.
This board is full of Arch autists and Windows normies LARPing as Linux users.
Lucas Powell
>muh meritocracy
isn't this a redhat project?
anyway
>RPM based
which implies trash. also, redhat is removing KDE from their distros...
Christopher Foster
It doesn't really have any glaring issues, so people can't meme about it. People can't meme about it, so it never comes up.
Ayden Harris
>redhat is removing KDE from their distros...
In 2024, and that doesn't mean Fedora will get rid of it. Makes sense for RedHat to consolidate into a single DE, too bad it's going to be Gnome.
Luke Allen
Asher Davis
Surely there are small USB adapters or something with open source wifi drivers, no?
Mason King
It's basically an infinitely worse Arch. Not anywhere as stable as debian, less updated than Arch and has annoying distro versions just like ubuntu that you have to upgrade all the time and it always messes everything up when you do.
I'm not kidding. I used it for years.
Landon Sanchez
i actually dont get whats funny about this
Isaac Edwards
>tunes the jvm
>can't tune her calories
Nathan Price
wifi is bad for you
Nathaniel Rivera
>installer is so great
news.softpedia.com
best distro