Did he improve on C?

Did he improve on C?

Attached: holyc.png (1224x666, 297K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=7uLzaKlZSQQ
llvm.org/pubs/2007-05-31-Switch-Lowering.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Is it too much voodoo for our purposes?

Eh, not really. But his JIT compiler and filesystem are pretty impressive.

Is this personified meme still going?...

No. He contributed nothing

What is start:in this context? An initial goto label for a for loop?

Not really, but stuffing all that functionality into 2MB is impressive. Especially in this day and age where webpages can be more than that even with adblocks and script blocks.

Yes he is smarter than any programmer before him exactly because he improved it.
he improved the switch/case for example

No, he got hit by a train.

Fuck off, niggers.
He is held in prison by CIA. Don't believe any CIA made conspiracy

well isn't that the hardest question in programming to distinguish so?

I wonder, how this works? Since HolyC uses jumptables every time, does this split the tables and runs code in between like:
if i

no

The CIA niggers want you to think it's just an if/else
Unironically I didn't know there's a difference is assembly between switch and if/else before Terry told me. I miss him

youtube.com/watch?v=7uLzaKlZSQQ 8:20
nevermind, it creates subroutine for start and end block and wraps all case blocks with it, pretty bad if you ask me

>he didn't have intro course on that
it gets tricky when there is a big gap between covered cases

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 93K)

where can I read about this more

Don't know anything about holyc but here's an overview of some techniques:
llvm.org/pubs/2007-05-31-Switch-Lowering.pdf

How does one just get hit by a train? Was he playing chicken with it?

he turned c from a filthy atheist into a devote catholic