Is this why there's been no technological advance in western medicine?

Attached: 1525946881110.png (669x522, 205K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lloyd_Blankfein
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

2/10 bait
read up on some of the advancements being made, its fucking jaw dropping. A good one to look at is cataracts surgery

Take a wild guess.
Almost no research money is given for defensive medicine since the late 80s when the fifth generation of antibiotics were invented for example.

Drug trials are not only flawed but incredibly rigged with almost no independent oversight.

If I was a biotech company I'd pour money into cures just so I can release a cure to what all the other companies are just releasing treatments for.

Yes and no. I work for a medical imaging company and honestly the diagnostic is really quite amazing. However, the treatment side is where everything is a clusterfuck, mainly because there's so much money tied to continued medication, office visits, etc.

same. I'm a 3rd-year phd student in biomed engineering, and our lab is working on new diagnostic techniques. diagnosing cv disease using mri, ct scans, mirna profiling, machine learning for diagnosis, etc. as a consequence i read a lot of new literature on imaging/diagnostic techniques and they're getting breddy damn good. i'm not very up to speed on treatment but the learning i had to do on it is ghastly. a large part of the problem is government regulation, and the other part is companies wanting treatments and not cures

This.

You mean that they are curing something that they can't exploit with a long term treatment instead? Conspiracy debunked then.

hurr durr just going to ignore all the advances in cancer research

why the fuck would you NOT cure something? Can you imagine the absolute fucking shitstorm this would cause? Zucc gets dragged to congress because of your data getting leaked instead of sold, what do you think congress would do to Goyman sacs if they did this?

Also not to mention goyman has fucking fingers in every bit of industry, it would be very beneficial for them to keep you alive.

If curing things were so simple even a retard like you could find cures.

>The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City.
>Key people: Lloyd Blankfein
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lloyd_Blankfein
>Born to a Jewish family, he was raised in the Linden Houses
>Jewish family

Jow Forums was right again

no, it's profit. Developing some new drug or procedure is very costly and if the probability of making all that money back threefold in a couple of years to satisfy stockholders, it's not worth doing.

This has been the case for the last half of the century at least.
Yeah yeah, "curing" something by selling you pills for the rest of your life, they simply keep inventing new stuff to cure you from, antidepressants being the biggest legal(because there's plenty of illegal scams) scam out there.

>why the fuck would you NOT cure something?
>what is a stable income source

>why the fuck would you NOT cure something? Can you imagine the absolute fucking shitstorm this would cause?
That's socialism user. Medicine is a service, if you want something you have to pay for it otherwise you're stealing from society. Turning medicine into a subscription based model is a legitimate business decision.

Or so they argue. Imo when ai and nanobots are invented we need to purge all capitalists, i dont trust them with this tech.

>if you want something you have to pay for it otherwise you're stealing from society
Well of course. And what I want to pay money for is a cure.

>Turning medicine into a subscription based model is a legitimate business decision
You can make that decision. But if some new business pops up selling cures, if you turn to the government to get them banned, YOU are a socialist AND you need to die.

Theres no point in advancement in medicine, ethnomedicine is already the peak

seen a documentary about phages/ super bugs that are antibiotic resistant russia is the only one that's done it, it's been tried in america but pharma will not give funding unless it's been patented

>stable source of income
Very unlikely. You would have to contain symptoms, ensure whatever sickness doesnt get worse, doesnt prevent the person from earning an income (so you can get paid) and also somehow prevent competitors from just making a cure.

>But if some new business pops up selling cures, if you turn to the government to get them banned, YOU are a socialist AND you need to die.

Actually, a socialist would just want it subsidised.

Stop pretending to not be a socialist to look edgy on 4chanel.

not if we purge you first commie scum

>Thinks his masters will give him the cure as a thanky for licking boots

That's not how this relationship works user.

They're in that position because a board of white people said "hey I love the jews" first. Jow Forums is retarded. They're getting stabbed by the back by "their" people but get angry at someone else

>he thinks commies will give him the cure out of the goodness of their own heart

enjoy being gulaged you moron

capitalism isn't perfect, but at the very least we are moving towards the future instead of stagnating in your shitty little smurf wonderland fantasies

Worked under Eastern European communism. Poland and Baltics took infinite EU money to get back on their feet, the non EU ones still struggle with health care. Even in Poland itself outside of the big shiny cities things have not recovered.

Communism is all about muh state, health care is one of the easiest ways to show the power of the state over your life.

>On September 22, 2015, Blankfein was diagnosed with a form of lymphoma.[62]

>He received multiple rounds of treatment of chemotherapy and by October 2016 was in remission.[63][64]

Yep, Jow Forums was right again.

Attached: even_moonman_cant_believe_this_shit.jpg (647x457, 41K)

yeah man that cataracts surgery has come a long way since gouging them out with a piece of rock in 29AD. Fortunate too since you gunna get cataracts pretty much guaranteed if you have certain eye procedures :^)

and cataract "surgery" is literally a 30 minute procedure now where the patient goes home the same day.

Used to be a surgery then 3 days of laying absolutely still.

You can charge a million dollars for a cure, idiot.

Or you can charge $1000 per person per month for centuries for treatment, inbred.

Even if some business prevents a cure to propagate, some other businesses or their competition will pop up and propagate the idea, while selling it as better, cheaper and actually curing you.

>some other businesses will lobby government and get laws passed to allow them to copy the formula and create generics to sell for cheaper to profit off the same customers while never thinking for a second to look for a cure
fixed for reality