Can't believe this thing is so slow
Can't believe this thing is so slow
Other urls found in this thread:
siliconlottery.com
twitter.com
such rebuttal
That's a nice radome
THROTTLING IN MY SKIN
THESE YIELDS THEY WILL NOT HEAL
absolute kek
I can't believe you're not a retarded and SEETHING AMD faggot?
My Intel i9-9900k performs flawlessly and overclocked to 5.5ghz stable. My POOZEN 2700x crashes Adobe Premiere(tm) and GCC constantly.
AMD basedfanboi false flagging spammers BTFO!
What a creative and insightful thread.
No evidence whatsoever.
Intel cia niggers sliding threads so we don't see the sales gain threads for AMD.
weird, my 9900k can't boot past 4.9 and crashes in KF2 and PUBG while my 2700x system clocked to 4.4 (BLCK OC) with ram at 3466 has never had a crash.
>my 9900k can't boot past 4.9
yeah, in a $100 motherboard with a hyper 212+
nah It's a z370 TAICHI with a NH D15
I guess i just lost the silicon lottery or something
It's some kind of weird isohedron, just get a $2 ball if you want it to roll fast
siliconlottery.com
>As of 11/17/18, the top 82% of tested 9900Ks were able to hit 4.9GHz or greater.
Which means 18% can't.
>that retarded box design
You should've known user
It is a valid rebuttal, given the other threads are just a lie as well.
Dumb Intel vs AMD poster.
>overclocked to 5,5ghz
imagine ruining your bait with this
so what are these people paying for?
A chance at being able to boost past 5.1GHz. It's a lottery after all.
>CMOS
I run my motorola 68000 at stable 8.2Ghz, and unlike your shitty CPU, i can run even windows ME without any crashes on it.
Also it is not affected by specter and meltdown because those defects weren't even invented back then.
imagine a company being so fucked up that they have to release a literal housefire and it still can't beat the competition so they rely on single core benchmarks and shills to survive and they lose sales anyway
now imagine people being so fucked up that they actually defend it online on cantonese painting forums