Is this real? Is Intel truly BTFO?

>corelets

needful

Attached: intelpajeets.jpg (660x450, 42K)

It's not about TDP it's about silicon quality and binning on lower end CPUs

4,2 on every
Somewhere above 5, perhaps not 5,6 but 5
they did advertise it as a node for 5Ghz devices

goy ples delid dis

Attached: 1501867726886.jpg (1500x1164, 337K)

>below expectation
>he expects 5.6 Ghz Ryzen CPU
Are you retarded?

4.2Ghz all 16 cores/threads
5Ghz single (more likely dual like Intel) core/thread(s)
Can probably overcock on all cores to 4.5Ghz but letting XFR do its thing would probably be best.

If those "leaks"(Rumors) are real dam that they look good.
Looks like its time to replace my I7-4790K.

Welp time to sell my 4770K before it's worthless in 2 months

Excusing me sir
But possible to delete and not spread this rumor sir
Can be hurtful and untrue which is bad for intel that has excellent coffee lake r CPU for all everyone
Truly regards

it's ok. Intel will release 9990K, with 6GHz turbo boost. It'll be delidded, delapped and comes with a chiller out of the box

Can any current AM4 board even properly support these 12 core beasts? Isn't' dual channel memory a bit inadequate for that too?

New boards will come out that are 6+2 instead 4+2, problem solved.
And im not talking about the fake Gigabyte or ASRock motherboards.

Unironically gigabyte release one of the best am4 mobos

#grainofsalt

#ADL

#supportisreal

Attached: 1542085404910.jpg (748x900, 138K)

Only their highest end Motherboard is good, And one of the best(if not the best) X470 motherboards, the rest are shit.
MSI makes the best B450-X470 motherboards but they come with a huge failure, lack of offset voltage (Which kills PBO).

>mfw we will see 5ghz+ Ryzen ocs out of the box
Oh fuck my dicc

Please delet this antisemitic video.

the "reddit" leak is completely fake, the fact that he sources it discredits any of this information.

If only they could pull such miracles in their GPU lines too.

if true, it's a 3600X or 3600 for me

>105W
christ I don't want a housefire.

Attached: 1543200069122.jpg (700x881, 142K)

Yeah the gaymen 7 methinks

Sandy i7 2600K was roughly 125W.

People don't just go to the internet and tell lies my man

Where do you absolute retards get your information from?

No they fucking didn't, kid. TSMC is not Global Foundries.

Yes. He is.

If Intel weren’t so dishonest about their tdp, the i9 9900k would be around 140-150w. 105w is nothing

this would absolutely destroy the market. holy shit if true. b450 works for ryzen 3xxx right?

as far as I know, b450 support for zen2 will be for everything up to the 12c/24t parts, so yes and no

*up to and including

Yes but not all, some shitty B450 motherboards have problems with the 2700 because the shitty VRM and lack of proper cooling (See all Gigabyte, ASRock, MSI PRO-A or VHD, literally any motherboard with no VRM heatsink).
Such problems would be worse with the new CPUs.

Good motherboards like the MSI B450 Tomahawk shouldn't have problems but dont expect a R7 3700 working on them properly.

>still slower than 9900K in games

How could this happen to me
I made my mistakes
I’ve got no where to run
The night goes on
As I’m fading away
I’m sick of this life
I just wanna scream
How could this happen to me

Attached: 1515221586890.png (682x792, 339K)

IMAGINE

Attached: ryzen 9.png (1443x123, 171K)

Honestly why is anyone surprised by this? It's perfectly reasonable frequency increase given the node shrink and adding more cores is trivial with zen architecture.

I'd bet my bottom dollar when the 3000 series comes out, will it blow the intards away hard.

It's almost certainly wrong

I expect ryzen 2 to top out at 4.5ghz

intel always tries to gaslight amd with fake leaks that make amd seem like it's going to be a monster and then when the amd products actually come out they're much worse than the inflated expectations people had and everyone gets mad and blames amd for falsely advertising and hyping themselves up too much

nigger zen+ can already do 4.1-4.2

You really think 300mhz or 7% is all they could squeeze from 7nm? That's literally worst case scenario

>it's almost certainly wrong

Based on the source that's real in your mind. AdoredTV is well connected, as is Kyle Bennett from HardOCP who has corroborated most of Adored's info.

Zen 2 will be the new 2500k

Literally buy it for 8+ years

And the refresh would be the I7-4790k.

I don't think so.
We are going to see a core explosion.
I'm talking about 128+ cores in 4 years.

Why cant we have weaker cores in CPUs yet?
Like 8 5GHz cores and 4-8 2GHz cores like ARM does.

Maybe
hardforum.com/threads/adoredtv-discusses-the-recent-amd-ryzen-and-radeon-3000-series-leaks.1973015/#post-1043970615

That might be coming.
We have other stuff on the horizon too like persistent memory which we've only barely implemented.
Our lost decade of technological gains is about to be kicked into overdrive. Moores law won't be aggressive enough to describe what's ahead.

200watts all cores at 5ghz oc. What do I do with all this cpu power? Stream games at 1080p60 with x264? Time to learn to learn making blender porn I guess. Can AM4 support more than 2 memory channels? You can have all those cores but not enough memory for multiple vms. What would you use 16 5ghz cores for?

Its fake. And gay. Some rando on the internet is not a credible source. Meanwhile intel is shitting up ryzen with their new i9

BRUH

$500 6-core/12 thread, 1080p@120fps+ computers?

Right now $500 gets you a 4 core Ryzen 3 2200G and a RX 570 4GB

If only AMD was doing as good in their GPU line as their CPU line.

Thread theme if true: youtu.be/j0lN0w5HVT8?t=37

what?!

are the toilet and that celeron real?

Yes and no.
That HEDT I3 was close though.

Learn how a power curve works, pal.
7nm Zen2 might clock 40% better than 14/12nm Zen1 at the low end of its curve, but have power consumption drastically ramp up at its high end making it unfeasible to hit those clocks at a marketable TDP. Every power curve is different, every power curve has different critical points.

Its astounding how people here don't seem to bother reading and learning fucking anything about this topic at all.

something something uncle

ARM's big.LITTLE is designed to save battery in a smartphone. Its not advantageous to utilize anywhere else. ARM does this because their big cores can't clock low enough with low enough power consumption to match their little cores. They're in entirely different domains of power consumption.
They can create a little core pulling 150mw that runs all the background processes in Android where as their high performance cores can't scale down low enough to compare.

This paradigm only exists because smartphones have incredibly limited battery capacities, and phones have shitloads of background processes running constantly. Its a total waste of time to implement this for anything else. The complexity of the fabric needed to switch threads between the cores on the fly is ridiculous.

Attached: arm-cpu-article-2013-4.png (600x354, 204K)

>His proof is that someone posted on reddit several days ago, then days after that he got an email with similar info and therefore the 2 corroborate each other as proof

Is this guy a total fucking mong? Yeah journalism pro right here, all you need to do is shit post on reddit then wait a week and email him similar info and he makes a video on it.

>2500k
>Not 2600K or 2700K

Yikes!

>Stream games at 1080p60 with x264?

You can already do that with Ryzen 1700

Or any IGPU that has hardware encoding.

That was the explanation years ago when they developed the technology.
My point is that we are going to see a core explosion, in which case high parallelization may see benefits of low power cores and high power cores to maintain an overall CPU power budget. These are things that weren't fully addressed when previous attempts were made with multiple core technologies, like the Cell processor, and Kilocore.

that wouldn't be x264 then

>AdoredTV is well connected
Did you even watch the video? He has zero connections, he saw a week old post on reddit and its numbers were similar to, but not the same as, an email he got from a nobody several days later and that's his source.

You could go post tomorrow on reddit saying "Ryzen 7 3950, 5.5ghz all cores, $129.99" then wait 4 days and email him "Ryzen 7 3960, 5.4ghz all cores, $139.99" and he'll make this exact video, because that's all that happened in this case.

Not enough ice in Antarctica

Adored is literally reposting forum rumors from overclock.net, WCCFtech, S|A, and Anandtech.
He isn't connected at all. He has no sources.

They're doing good in their CPU line because they've a̶b̶a̶n̶d̶o̶n̶e̶d̶ shelved their GPU line.

is that the predator on the left

Ryzen 7 3700X
RX 3800 = RTX 2080 performance for half the price
I'm ready

Attached: 1537876744255.gif (400x208, 131K)

Thermal budget isn't an issue when working with a high TDP part, nor is any modern X86 core starved for performance because the OS is scheduling too many background processes on it.
A core can handle low intensity background threads and stay at 1-2% utilization. The big.Little concept has nothing to offer in a desktop, or even a laptop, unless you want to artificially restrict your laptop with a laughably small battery just to fuck over your consumers. Even then you'd be better off spending the silicon on some hardware accelerator to save cycles in a common workload like we did with video decoders.

The concept of big.LITTLE wasn't just some inane excuse ARM made up. Its the sole reason why it exists, and it will always hold true.

Don't get your hopes up about Navi prices

Don't get your hopes up for Nvidia prices

Attached: 1526047306344.png (565x541, 157K)

Consider getting a Vega 64 now, they're usually on sale for $400. They're overstocked and trying to clear inventory.

Ok that may be the case, but big.LITTLE has some other characteristics, mainly the dissimilarities between core types that I think we will see - for one reason or another - in CPUs (not that we haven't seen something like that with APU or grafted on GPUs integrated in CPU silicon)

RX 3080 is competing with 1080/2070. We won't see AMD cards competing with 2080/2080 Ti until late 2019/2020.

who fucking care it just $250

Considering they couldn't make a dent in Nvidia's sales when "ATI" products were superior in almost every objective measure, they'd only send themselves broke trying to out RnD team green. Seriously, who the fuck was buying Tesla when based HD4000 series existed?

It's not going to be $250 fren

he doesnt source it, he says the reddit info is wrong in the vid...

Having big doubts about their GPUs.

Attached: Screenshot (32).png (1791x582, 81K)

Witnessed!

It'll be both. 2600/2700k like performance leap, 2500k price.

Suspiciously Jow Forums suddenly has declared Kyle a nobody who knows absolutely nothing in the last thread.

Novidiots still haven't forgiven him for debunking the GPP

Nvidia will never cede an inch to AMD, especially now that they're seeing Intel scram up after dominating for a decade.

Intel will eventually get their shit together and they'll make sure to bury AMD like they did to Cyrix.

what the fuck fuck you kyle you lying sack of shit

Intelaviv is finished and bankrupt

AMD confirmed dead and bankrupt this time next year! For real this time eh?

good luck but im snagging some april 2019 amd calls

Why do I feel bloodlust from AMD. Do they want to destroy Intel that much?