What's the difference between st and urxvtd regarding resource usage and startup time?

What's the difference between st and urxvtd regarding resource usage and startup time?

Attached: 2000px-Suckless_logo.svg.png (2000x1304, 13K)

it don't matter

>not using alacritty

>startup time
Nibba, if both of them don't start immediately when called you should consider throwing out your toaster.
st is nice when patched for scrolling but I would recommend going for urxvtd for convenience.

But tilda is nicer than both.

>st is nice when patched for scrolling
You literally don't need scrolling

>If Apple designed a vt

Apple always bloats their software

Apple always misses useful features and tell you don't need them or that it's a feature not to have features

Just use a terminal multiplexer if you need scrolling

I literally don't care about your opinion and want to be able to scroll back up.

...

What did he mean by this?

Don't play dumb

Ok, you know what? tmux is a piece of shit, I'm not going to memorize those keybinds and it's pointless too, every recent non-minimal Linux install comes with a terminal that supports tabs and even when I'm in the mood to rice a machine I won't be fucked to torture myself with a terminal that has a minimal feature set.
I don't need to plaster my desktop in terminals for 1337 h4X0R points, tilda does everything I want.

If I'm confined to a console my preference would be dvtm, that's actually useful.

>You want features? Well use a different product then! T: Apple

>scrolling
that's what more is for, do you even gnu

Yeah, I'm going to pipe everything into a fucking pager, lmao.

The difference is that neither of those aren't Termite.

>vte

>gpu accelerated terminal

Attached: laughing_aqua.gif (384x372, 2.83M)

since bottleneck is Xorg and otbaining pty, no startup happens in one render frame

>everything
how often do you need scroll back

is that a serious question?