>he doesn't use Rust yet.
Why you don't use Rust?
>he doesn't use Rust yet.
Why you don't use Rust?
Other urls found in this thread:
github.com
github.com
github.com
twitter.com
Explain how it is "more control, more safety"
i'm straight
Because Haskell is sexier
>c++ arbitrarily has more control than Java and python
control over what, your social life?
COLLECT WOOD
yeah >>= i ?
>memory safety without garbage collector
>prevent some kinds of race conditions
>Zero-cost abstraction
C++ has done this for decades now and just like in Rust the mechanisms to help do this can be turned off with unsafe code.
fmap fmap fmap
>no one has made any large scale application with Rust yet
>inb4 huuur much servo
until someone makes a full web browser or AAA game in Rust you can all fuck off because no one gives a shit about these minor back room utilities made in Rust
> firefox ?
>huuuur
You can't spell turds without rust
I don't have anything against Rust, just haven't bothered. I still use C++ for most non-web stuff.
Because the JVM is fast enough for what I do, and just like your picture says, if I need more performance I reach for C, and if I need to shit some script, I just use the designated language: Python.
I thought that dealing with turbonormies was something bad when programming .NET and Java, but after dealing with some RoR euphorics, I now know better than to get involved with anything too pozzed. And I can't think of anything worse than Rust in that regard.
based and redpilled
can it do linked lists?
most of firefox isn't rust
None of Firefox is in Java.
>implying someone claimed that or its relevant otherwise for the discussion
Isn't it funny how Rust fags have such a ugly and useless language
C++ has had this for years.
>More control
If you consider spending 95% of your time spend fighting the borrow checker over simple shit, then sure, that's more control.
>zero-cost
Yeah, right. How often do you actually take things that claim to have no cost seriously?
I would use C for any of Rust's use cases, just not interested.
>I'll only use something after everybody else has already
How could you be this much of an NPC? People like you will never be ahead of the curve or contribute anything new to the field, you'll never be more than a code monkey.
The cost itself is abstract
>can't program a liked list
I don't use Rust for the same reasons that I don't wear a penis lock or work in a cuckshed.
I use PHP, a man's language.
>javascript
>bloat
i will never not lose my sides at this
>not using C++ for web stuff too
lmao
Stop making these threads. Rust is a wonderful language and pieces of shit like you are making it look awful with this endless, unwarranted shilling, AND you do a piss poor job of explaining its advantages over its competitors. LOOK AT THESE ANONS:
You told them fucking nothing with "some kinds of race conditions" or "memory safety without GC" as it's so much more than that. You can't even explain the basics of what makes the Rust ecosystem so great. Stop posting. Leave.
This is a myth created by people who either regurgitate hearing it or haven't learned what a lifetime is.
So is this.
How easy is it to use? I only like Python and Ruby.
What implementation are we looking at?
what do you mean
It's not an easy language at all, takes time and dedication but it pays off. You might like Go though, it's similar to those two but is actually fast.
>12/16/18(Sun)00:49:30 No.68944485
>12/16/18(Sun)00:49:29 No.68944486
gj gookmoot
The c u c k box.
...
what a lame get desu
?
why did you quote me
because it was already in my postbox and i was lazy to delete since it was relevant
dont bully
>You can't even explain the basics of what makes the Rust ecosystem so great
>You can't make my argument for you
LOL
Rust is a meme. Grow up and use C++.
>grow up and use a disgusting bloated behemoth noone will ever fully comprehend
Thanks, I'll pass. I've had to do that for long, wasn't very fun. C++ would be a much better language if they weren't so obsessively backwards compatible
But C++ has this, especially since C++11. Do you think templates are instantiated during runtime? Templates are literally zero cost abstraction.
Man, it's almost like reading Tcl, and I mean it in a good way
1. warn on all core guidelines violations
2. -Werror
3. ???
4. profit
that is not the issue at all with C++, but this is good advice to anyone reading this thread.
Rust is very restrictive that graph is misleading to retarded
I hate that auto stuff.
> Empowering everyone to buildreliable and efficient software.
github.com
github.com
github.com
what if i'm not a fag?
Because I'm not a cuck soiboi. Enjoy the CoCk up your ass.
Rust is not more control. it's less control more safety just not as far as Java.
Rust is pretty much safer version of C++, aka for faggot loosers who can't manage memory themselves.
>Why you don't use Rust?
There aren't any good ways to make GUI applications yet.
Your picture suggests otherwise
>still calling them philosophers, which is so exclusive and a white-people thing
>not calling them rappers and drag-queens
Why is the Rust community so backwards?
>saying "c/c++" as if they were the same language
This is how you spot retards.
cuz C# is comfy as fuck and Java is fine too.
You can do whatever the fuck you want in unsafe blocks, enough to write a kernel at least, and it's more memory safe as well outside of unsafe blocks.
So... are you going to explain why Rust is good? Or just shit on them and then leave everyone with an even worse outlook of the language?
>retards
except you know for the fact that there is software you write that uses a c++ compiler but uses practically no c++ features and is essentially c code with a few small differences.
By your logic, saying "English/French" is ok since there are words in common.
Then why don't you explain why rust is so good?
My logic is the infographic is intended for an application developer audience so the grouping makes sense.
>he doesn't call every western language "Latin-descended nonsense"
Also, I prefer to call both C and C++ "ALGOL-descended nonsense"
C++ is a superset of C