*exists by itself*

See you in 1000 years if you're still around :^)

Attached: Sö_32 _Skåäng.jpg (1280x1828, 634K)

On account of it taking 10 times as long as to type it, during which you need to retain the data.

Not quite. It's more that you simply can't just remember what you're being told one word at a time because you can type that fast. Writing by hand you have to summarise paragraphs as sentences and sentences as words, and to do that you have to comprehend what is being said more completely. It's that comprehension that helps aid memory and understanding because you had to "translate" what is being said to you in to your "own language".

My government (Belgium) had a shit ton of files on paper. Over 33% of fraud cases we had literally rotted away because of the use of paper. Also data does not exist by itself, it's saved on a medium you twat

*still readable*
enjoy your data rot, digitalfags

Attached: 2018-12-16-230118_1920x1080_scrot.png (1920x1080, 3.26M)

Personal data is identifiable information therefore to exist the person must be identified otherwise the information doesn't exist in itself irrevocably from time concomitantly of its generation from person.

*erosion blocks your path*

>not easily searchable, can't store videos, data analysis can't be performed

Interesting how thousand-year-old texts are still available in original copies over in fucking Iceland, yet your government can't seem to preserve documents from 70 years ago. You need more priests, the OG database masters.

>evidence about crime that is usually committed by rich people just turns to mulch
thinking_emoji.gif

Or Ireland and Britain, where everything is wet and damp for most of the year.

good luck searching anything. Even manual indexing is slow as hell.

*Is insanely time consuming to extract value*
There's a very strategic reason pro-2nd am supporters want to keep all gun records in paper form

>does thing other thing doesn’t
>countered by other thing that neutralizes previous things ~superior feature~
Everything is pointless. It all means nothing. We should all just kill ourselves.

If you wanted more leisure time in life, you'd invent machines that did things less efficiently.

*checkmates*

Attached: p.jpg (500x500, 22K)

Not that interesting. It's only a small part of all texts from that time and it's only survived thanks to being stored under optimal conditions.

>both are correct
O' fuck

Attached: my mind.jpg (1280x720, 117K)

If the only thing that can damage your information bank is brute nature force over hundreds of years, I say it is a very safe data bank.

Even more, it's ROCK SOLID

Attached: 11473458.jpg (300x300, 26K)

>most of the Codex Regius surviving 1000 years in a monastery on a damp island (8 out of 51 pages were missing, probably taken)
>vs
>more than 33% of evidence against mafia "rotting away" in a safe government building in less than a century
You are missing the point.

That can't exist without being stored in a dry environment with little to no insects. Paper is made of carbon, which can be considered a tasty snack to a common, starving insect.

Oh so you want you want a copy of you birth certificate? Come back in 6 months lmoa

I will need the paper in the box on the top shelf.
You have about 0.002 ms to find it.

Attached: osg-i-arkhiv-vneofisnoe-khranenie-dokumentov.jpg (1024x683, 879K)

>dabs on your mongodb

why is everyone in class staring at your dick?

because it's the apple classroom

I agree paper has its uses (studying) and it has far outlived other media. But the amount of space is wastefull.

And good luck trying to find something. Ever been to a fuck huge library and try to find something without a PC in a reasonable time?

Taking backups of paper is also painfully while it's very quick with digital means.

The issue I have with digital means is that it can be edited easily. A blockchain would be a good idea to make a storage chain. Older documents would be extremely hard to fraudulate that way.

Why are you so fleeting user?

Attached: 1517869208981.jpg (910x647, 184K)

I use paper to store all my sensitive data. Two simple reasons for this:

1. Telemetry is basically physically impossible.

2. Unlike digital data, data on paper can be irrecoverably destroyed very easily. You can thwart a forensic recovery in seconds with a simple cigarette lighter.

>I use paper to store all my sensitive data

Attached: 1538807785446.png (720x455, 483K)

I mean, if the Russkies employed that method successfully, I don't see why I can't.