Why does Microsoft allow people to search for child pornography?

Why does Microsoft allow people to search for child pornography?

Attached: bing-site-search-760x400.png (760x400, 28K)

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/google/comments/a6r59o/google_search_vs_bing_search/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Why should they not? Should Wikipedia also delete their article about it?

It's impossible to determine if someone is searching for child pornography. Are they looking for news about child pornography? Or actual child porn?

Even if you COULD determine that it was a genuine attempt at finding it, you couldn't know whether someone is trying to frame someone else.

i think op is referring to that img tag thing that was posted a few months earlier

because they are BASED and REDPILLED

>mfw i accidentally searched for "nn" in ddg

daily reminder that bing image search > google image search

I accidentally pasted a random source code snippet into bing once, and got this stern warning about cp being a crime. Still no idea what that was about.

Based Bill.

Found a shareblue shill
reddit.com/r/google/comments/a6r59o/google_search_vs_bing_search/
kys OP

Attached: 1544887565710.jpg (803x801, 115K)

how about you, you liar

Attached: file.png (1332x186, 19K)

nn on both ddg and bing
ohhhkayyy.
Clap emoji*

Fuck off retard

>look up "forced" in porn search engine
>get recommended to see a therapist
When did porn sites become moral arbiters

For me they usually just don't provide search results.

Riddle me this, asshole: Why should it be illegal to possess or look at pictures that are evidence of a crime if you had no involvement in the committing of that crime? Or even better, in the case of lolicon hentai and similar shit, why should it be illegal to possess or look at pictures that did not involve any sort of crime in their creation whatsoever?

>BurgerUSA

>removed

supply and demand. If their are consumers of such materials, there will be demand for them as well and kids will continued to be exploited. Also because muh feels by feminists. But I think the first reason is probably what makes it illegal.

Your attempted "supply and demand" argument fails to explain lolicon hentai being illegal (despite no kids being exploited), guro hentai being legal, consensual non-consent being legal, fake violence in blockbuster movies being both in high demand and legal, and videogame violence having no effect on people committing actual real world violence, amongst other things.

Goddammit! That search actually leads to some Cheese Pizza. Am I screwed now?

Attached: Boceto.png (487x315, 161K)

Not him but loli doujins aren’t illegal in most of the world. I agree it’s retarded to ban them because increasing supply and demand doesn’t hurt anybody

There are a lot of "random" phrases that pop up pizza in searches.
I can't tell if thats by design.

Better than Jow Forums. There's a search term that so easily returns CP, that if you even post the term, you'll be banned for child pornagraphy.

>videocam video from

>accidentally searched for "fucking kids"
>I was looking for that video of a guy shouting at kids crossing the street saying "fucking kids, I've places to be!!"

That's not how the supply or the demand works. The actual reason why it should be illegal (and by the same line of argumentation so should lolicon or 3DCG) is because it increases the prevalence of pedophilia in society, which in turn also increases the number of cases of children getting hurt (although to what extent and in what way are debatable).

lolno, you have to be legitimately fucking retarded like Thad to get busted. the FBI is busy as fuck with other shit, and they need a double slam dunk case to even think about going after you, as it costs a shitload of money and time to investigate and prosecute. Shit, even if you're out there raping kids it takes them forever to get on the case, like with that sick fuck Larry Nassar, who raped over 250 girls and at least 1 boy before getting busted, even though people had been reporting him for years.

>search for pthc on motherless
>nothing

>videogame violence has been shown to not increase prevalence of violence in society
>child porn, lolicon hentai and related crap increases prevalence of pedophilia in society
Choose one and only one. Pick wisely.

i don't know what these acronyms mean

bing is the king of porn. Microsoft designed it for that.

>being a pedophile does not increase the prevalence of pedophilia in society
I think you're supposed to argue that it doesn't necessarily lead to you acting on it and harming children.

Attached: 9d5.png (2688x2688, 173K)

What

img also works

Neural network, it's for really advanced computer generated CP.

Sure, we can go with that too. That bit usually comes up when people assert that being a pedophile is illegal or some such nonsense. Child molestation is illegal as it should be, but being a pedophile isn't.

(I prefer my women curvy, but being pedantic and arguing about this shit is amusing enough to fill the empty time before christmas.)

To be fair I'm willing to concede that since I have no fucking idea what the research looks like on rape/molestation and their correlation to pedophilia (or if it even exists).

Although I'm skeptical of both that and the "videogames with glorified violence are only an outlet, they don't make you more violent" thing. Especially if you consider edgy school shooter games or ones with outright sadism as the goal.

>Although I'm skeptical of both that and the "videogames with glorified violence are only an outlet, they don't make you more violent" thing. Especially if you consider edgy school shooter games or ones with outright sadism as the goal.
You do know psychopaths (school shooters, serial killers and other Emmy award winners) are born broken?

Do you?

It's strange how many people don't realise how much better bing image search is to googles. It's not just the results, the UI is far superior.

UI is superior but results are inferior imho

>To be fair I'm willing to concede that since I have no fucking idea what the research looks like on rape/molestation and their correlation to pedophilia (or if it even exists).
Actually the evidence is pretty clear. In adult context, more access to legal porn and fast internet results in lower rates of rape. Likewise, when legal options of child porn is available, rates of child molestation goes down

Attached: CP is better than CSA2.jpg (1868x777, 321K)

Then legalizing CP would be a preferable alternative to what we have now, assuming the research is conclusive and someone smarter than me when it comes to social science doesn't see any glaring issues. The "indecent exposure and less serious sex crimes" bit in particular is very interesting.

No, they are made broken. Everyone is equal at birth

>youngsters
lel why

>hands-on offences
it gets better

I personally think it's a mix of both. Some people are born extremely likely to become pedos or murderers (yet never go on to actually become one due to miraculously lucky circumstances), whereas some people are born extremely UNlikely (but end up becoming one all the same due to gradually being exposed to a long chain of unfortunate events). Same goes for being gay or having certain mental illnesses.